Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This club is a rabble

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This club is a rabble

    For the past 5 years we have invested in shit. Simple as that. We are gone. Don't have the troops. Last night was embarressing! The coach cant pick a side that can go back to back, we are in serious trouble. Steve Noyce assured me it was a new change, a new direction. What a load of crap.

  • #2
    Originally posted by bring back easts View Post
    For the past 5 years we have invested in shit. Simple as that. We are gone. Don't have the troops. Last night was embarressing! The coach cant pick a side that can go back to back, we are in serious trouble. Steve Noyce assured me it was a new change, a new direction. What a load of crap.
    Oooo, I'm selling nooses, $2 each.

    You interested?

    Comment


    • #3
      This is year one of a five year plan.

      I think you should settle. Most teams in this comp are struggling for consistency(aside from merge).

      We have a young team with some deadwood. Change doesn't happen overnight.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by bring back easts View Post
        For the past 5 years we have invested in shit. Simple as that. We are gone. Don't have the troops. .
        Aren't they the same troops that beat semi final aspirants Gold Coast, Souths and Wests?

        We do have the troops.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View Post
          Aren't they the same troops that beat semi final aspirants Gold Coast, Souths and Wests?

          We do have the troops.
          What we need is Finch back.
          Last edited by Shaun Kenny-Dumb; 06-06-2010, 09:05 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            stop being a sook. We got the spoon last year. We've improved massively (once a fortnight anyway...)

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Shaun Kenny-Dumb View Post
              What we need is Finch back.
              I don't agree. I think we need some more strike power in the backs, but that's it. We have the players we need.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View Post
                I don't agree. I think we need some more strike power in the backs, but that's it. We have the players we need.
                This can't be the Verlaine I know.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Shaun Kenny-Dumb View Post
                  This can't be the Verlaine I know.
                  What is this Finch obsession?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View Post
                    What is this Finch obsession?
                    I asked Tom Verlaine this question years ago.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Shaun Kenny-Dumb View Post
                      I asked Tom Verlaine this question years ago.
                      You seem to be rewriting history a little. Go back to the Wall and see how Finch related threads I started. I can remember two. And one of them was after last year's grand final. The rest were all you nutballs and your weirdo obsession.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View Post
                        You seem to be rewriting history a little. Go back to the Wall and see how Finch related threads I started. I can remember two. And one of them was after last year's grand final. The rest were all you nutballs and your weirdo obsession.
                        You didnt have to start the threads to be involved in them Tom

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Shaun Kenny-Dumb View Post
                          You didnt have to start the threads to be involved in them Tom
                          But that's not the same thing, is it? It was you nutballs who had the Finch obsession.








                          Edit: comma added after thing.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View Post
                            But that's not the same thing is it? It was you nutballs who had the Finch obsession.
                            Yet you always made your way in to defend the buck toothed wonder. Why Tom?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Shaun Kenny-Dumb View Post
                              Yet you always made your way in to defend the buck toothed wonder. Why Tom?
                              Because I believed in the cause. And still do.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X