Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anthony Watts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Anthony Watts

    Looks like we could have Anthony Watts in our clours next year as reported in RLW. I think this would be an excelent sighning and would compliment Jake Freind.
    I regards to recruiting I don't think we need to go after to many players apart from Dugan and James Graham. With those two players plus some exciting talent coming through the future looks very promising.

    Booster.

  • #2
    Milky's an excellent signing - one of the most underrated players in the NRL

    five times the player Jaubs is

    Comment


    • #3
      good signing. I don't think Brunton is fit for first grade YET.

      Hooking options look promising though.

      Comment


      • #4
        I was expecting Friend/Jones to forge a starting hooker/impact hooker combination. But now I am guessing that Friend/Watts will make the combination instead. Watts can cover the halves too.

        I don't see why Jones won't be given at least a decent shot at that bench hooker role. He is basically the same sort of player as Watts, albeit with less aggression and mongrel.

        Comment


        • #5
          Watts is a selfish player. If you watch him play, he is playing to himself and not to the team

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by The Mack View Post
            I don't see why Jones won't be given at least a decent shot at that bench hooker role. .
            Perhaps because he is not a hooker..

            If you think because he played 20 minutes as a fill-in hooker in a pre-season exhibition match, he is good enough to be an NRL hooker, I am going to lose it. You know much more about footy than that TheMack.

            If Smith had any inclination of using Jones as a hooker don't you think he may have tested him out at Newtown or under 20's...

            This notion of Jones to hooker needs to be dropped..IMO

            I can't stand Anthony Watts, but geez he has been having a big go at anyone...and I do like that....

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Pass the Ball View Post
              Perhaps because he is not a hooker..

              If you think because he played 20 minutes as a fill-in hooker in a pre-season exhibition match, he is good enough to be an NRL hooker, I am going to lose it. You know much more about footy than that TheMack.

              If Smith had any inclination of using Jones as a hooker don't you think he may have tested him out at Newtown or under 20's...

              This notion of Jones to hooker needs to be dropped..IMO

              I can't stand Anthony Watts, but geez he has been having a big go at anyone...and I do like that....
              Watts was never a hooker here with us too. He was a halfback. That is the way some of these players work out - they probably don't have the creativity for the halves consistently, but their good acceleration off the mark and ball skills could make them a useful bench hooker, strictly for impact. I am aware that Smith doesn't seem to want to use him there, but I still think it was worth a try.

              Craig Wing, Aaron Payne, Issac Luke all played in the halves as a youngster.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post

                five times the player Jaubs is
                That's not much of an endorsement.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Watts killed it against us when we played the Cowgirls.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    rubbish signing, why do we need another hooker??

                    keep signings to a minimum we have a squad we will all see improve

                    Linnett looks solid, he looks quick as well

                    from other entries made on this site there seems to be a fair opinion of a few of our lower grade younger guys, lets develop them

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Labroy View Post
                      rubbish signing, why do we need another hooker??
                      keep signings to a minimum we have a squad we will all see improve

                      Linnett looks solid, he looks quick as well

                      from other entries made on this site there seems to be a fair opinion of a few of our lower grade younger guys, lets develop them

                      because he's better than any we have, including Friend as it stands (with the jury still out on him), and he would have been relatively cheap

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post
                        because he's better than any we have, including Friend as it stands (with the jury still out on him), and he would have been relatively cheap
                        Did you mean in a playing capacity or did you mean this literally?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Fleabag Fletch View Post
                          Did you mean in a playing capacity or did you mean this literally?
                          Boom Boom - Nice work...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I don't want Watts at the Roosters because he is a dirty player and was let go from the Roosters before for reasons of poor attitude I believe. Has he changed? I somehow doubt it but don't think the Roosters need to take a chance on him given the players already on the payroll (Friend, JAubs, Samuela, Brunton, Foran).
                            "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."

                            Thomas Jefferson

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              if its a cheap sign we can always send him to newtown or paddo colts?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X