Tweet
Just announced in post game show, Mander did not have the last footage available when he decided.
Still...**** you NRL!!!
Still...**** you NRL!!!
-
Alcohol never solved any life problems.....then again neither did milk. -
Meh. if it was a conspiracy, they wouldnt have shown it. Sometimes they dont immediately have all the angles available.
Still think Vidot, Locke decisions were more blatantly incorrect.Comment
-
Why not??? it is a joke, all angles should be avaliable, just hit rewind pricks !Originally posted by melon.... View Post
Delecto Oriens est odio Meridianus
To love Easts is to hate Souffs
Originally posted by Bill Shankley, Liverpool FCOriginally posted by Andy Raymond Commentating Souffs V Manly 18/04/09Comment
-
You didnt even need the third angle to clearly tell it was obviously not a try. We've witnessed some bad decisions, but that HAS to be the worst I've ever seen.Comment
-
i wonder what that ****wit Finch will come up with this week to explain this **** upComment
-
Originally posted by melon.... View Post
It doesn't matter that the Mander didn't see the last angle. He made a call that he was certain (no benefit of the doubt!) that the ball was stripped by Minichiello without sufficient evidence. The fact he got it way wrong just emphasises how stupid his decision was.
Even if he gave "benefit of the doubt" it would have been the wrong call with no evidence available. It should always have been a "ref's call" so that a different stupid referee could make the wrong decision.
Mander and Foxtel cameramen deserve to be reprimanded for that incident.Comment
-
-
You should also be aware that Tim Mander is a Bronco's supporter.Originally posted by fletch View Post...Comment
-
It's video and digital post production FFS! There is no way known that they could have one angle without the others. It's a disgrace and bordering on corrupt. The Bunnies have been crying hard done by, but we've won three in a row despite some *contentious* refereeing decisions. There is no excuse for not showing that third angle. Wouldn't someone in the OB truck say, "Tim, we've got a more definitive angle if you'd like to see it?"... It is beyond belief that it manifested itself three seconds after the whistle was blown and they cued it up straight away... Something stinks bad here.Originally posted by dice View PostComment
-
As Brandy said, if you don't have evidence, you just can't create it. Mander just assumed Folau may have been stripped and gave it. I cannot believe all these wrong decisions just going against us. What the hell is going?
Comment
-
I agree Fairfax. ****ing rortComment
-
It has to be about Robert Finch seeking revenge for the way we treated his son. There's no other explanation for the abominable refereeing decisions against the Roosters.Comment
-
Even at the game the Wankos fans had given up on it being a try.
They were pissing themselves when the green light came up.
It fit the theme, every set coming off their line theyd get a penalty, the over referral of our tries to the video reff, and Minis no-try, surely that was a bullshit call???
They sure hate losing the Wanko fans. And we sure let them know theyd lost, and with plenty of assistance from Ruprects pink ladys.
The FlogPen .
You know it makes sense.Comment
-
the funniest thing about the whole Foloau try was Gordon ****wit Tallis trying to justify the decision.
The man is so dumb its unbelivableThe Internet is a place for posting silly things
Try and be serious and you will look stupid
sigpicComment
-
It was ironic that he and Daley were the only ones that believed that was a try.Originally posted by Kingbilly View Post
Two of the dumbest people in rugby league agreeing. Hilarious.Born and bred in the eastern suburbs.Comment
Comment