Player ratings in the SMH

[Vasco]

This Josh Rakic is a first class clown.

Most Roosters players receiving a 5 or 6 whereas Tigers getting 7 or 8.

His comment on Kennedy: "Hardly sighted but damaging at full steam".

Hardly sighted?

On Jake Friend: "Wasn't as creative as he should have been".

Geez, he looked pretty good setting up a try and was our spark from dummy half.

Finally, his comments and rating of Marshall: "Threw just as many punches as he did flick passes. Tommy Raudonikis would have been proud". 8/10

What a tosser.

[TheLoneRooster]

I was hoping someone would mention this crap by that fargwit rakich. Don't know what to make of his ratings other than to say he must be a tigpies supporter and not a great fan of the Roosters. Additionally, the SMH largely talks about the tigpies and it give me the feeling that the Roosters were mere bit players in the tigpies glory and tragedy.

I'll go to the trouble of putting the ratings in here shortly so everyone else can see them ...

[Guest]

indeed, that's disgraceful. marshall's performance was idiotic at best - costing them a certain try! if i was gareth ellis i'd clock him one on the chin for ruining the entire game with me dad out from england in the stands!

[TheLoneRooster]

EASTS
1. Mini -- 6/10
2. Phil -- 6/10
3. Kane -- 5/10
4. SKD -- 6/10
5. Perrett -- 5/10
6. Carney -- 7/10
7. Pearce -- 5/10
8. Ryles -- 4/10
18. JAubs -- 5/10
10. FPN -- 5/10
13. Myles -- 7/10
12. MAubs -- 5/10
11. Anasta -- 7/10
14. Kennedy -- 4/10
15. JWH -- 5/10
16. Conn -- 3/10
9. Friend -- 6/10

TOTAL -- 91/170 or 53.5% -- barely a pass

Most of rakich's comments were negative in nature.

[Guest]

who cares we won, that's a 10 out of 10 TEAM EFFORT for sure

[Guest]

he forgot the most interesting stat

roosters 19 - tigers 15

Stick those numbers up his hairy date

[The Brain]

EASTS
1. Mini -- 6/10
2. Phil -- 6/10
3. Kane -- 5/10
4. SKD -- 6/10
5. Perrett -- 5/10
6. Carney -- 7/10
7. Pearce -- 5/10
8. Ryles -- 4/10
18. JAubs -- 5/10
10. FPN -- 5/10
13. Myles -- 7/10
12. MAubs -- 5/10
11. Anasta -- 7/10
14. Kennedy -- 4/10
15. JWH -- 5/10
16. Conn -- 3/10
9. Friend -- 6/10

TOTAL -- 91/170 or 53.5% -- barely a pass

Most of rakich's comments were negative in nature.

Tigpies had us for 40 minutes we had them 60 ???
The reporter is obviously a fan and a sore loser.

[TheLoneRooster]

I'll now post the tigpies' ratings from rakeech ...

4. brown -- 7/10
2. lote -- 7/10
3. ayshford -- 8/10
15. daniela -- 5/10
5. beau -- 6/10
6. benji - 8/10
7. lui -- 7/10
17. gibbs -- 9/10
9. farah -- 7/10
10. galloway -- 7/10
8. payten -- 8/10
12. ellis -- 9/10
13. heighno -- 8/10
14. fifita -- 6/10
11. fulton -- 7/10
16. dwyer -- 6/10
19. masila -- 0/10

TOTAL -- 115/170 -- 67.64%

By contrast to the comments on Roosters players, most of rakeech's comments about his seemingly beloved (though BEATEN) tigpies were positive.

[elo]

Kennedy 4/10 is a disgrace, he was immense in that second half and extra time.

[Guest]

Who won MOM at channel 9 and who was the players player?

[TheLoneRooster]

Take out the two lowest scores of both sides (Conn and masila) and these are the scores in percentage terms ...

EASTS -- 55%
tigpies -- 71.87%

A bigger difference than when accounting for all 17 players.

As pwn said, crackich forgot the all important score - 19 to 15 ROOSTERS WIN.

[Kurt Sherlock's Mo]

I gleefully retrieved my SMH from the front lawn this morning, looking to read about the game. Those player ratings caused me to shake my head and immediately put it down.

The comments for JWH and Kennedy PROVE he wasn't even watching the game and was going off what he overheard from a suicidal Tigers supporter crying into his methadone and milk at Campbelltown railway station.

[TheLoneRooster]

Who won MOM at channel 9 and who was the players player?

MOTM was Carney.
I have no idea who was Player's Player.

[TheLoneRooster]

I gleefully retrieved my SMH from the front lawn this morning, looking to read about the game.

As did I and what did I find? Fark all about just how gutsy the Roosters were and plenty about the BEATEN tiggers.

Those player ratings caused me to shake my head and immediately put it down.

They made me angry I'm embarrassed to say.

The comments for JWH and Kennedy PROVE he wasn't even watching the game and was going off what he overheard from a suicidal Tigers supporter crying into his methadone and milk at Campbelltown railway station.

LOL

[Guest]

I'll now post the tigpies' ratings from rakeech ...

4. brown -- 7/10
2. lote -- 7/10
3. ayshford -- 8/10
15. daniela -- 5/10
5. beau -- 6/10
6. benji - 8/10
7. lui -- 7/10
17. gibbs -- 9/10
9. farah -- 7/10
10. galloway -- 7/10
8. payten -- 8/10
12. ellis -- 9/10
13. heighno -- 8/10
14. fifita -- 6/10
11. fulton -- 7/10
16. dwyer -- 6/10
19. masila -- 0/10

TOTAL -- 115/170 -- 67.64%

By contrast to the comments on Roosters players, most of rakeech's comments about his seemingly beloved (though BEATEN) tigpies were positive.

Those ratings are absolutely ****ing ridiculious!

Marshall is the most overrated ****ing player in the comp, throws a flick pass or does a chip kick once every 20 rounds and gets rated 8/10. He was appauling last night done sweet **** all.

P.S Braith was the best Rooster for mine last night, nice field goal under pressure playing in the second row.