Match Review Panel says JWH hit should have been penalty

[fletch]

just listening to the NRL news with John Gibbs and Freddy and they were saying the match review panel findings was that it should have been a penalty for the hit on JWH, the reason Dwyer was not charged was because he set himself for the tackle and JWH lower his body for impact rather than Dwyer launching himself into JWH's chin.

[Guest]

just listening to the NRL news with John Gibbs and Freddy and they were saying the match review panel findings was that it should have been a penalty for the hit on JWH, the reason Dwyer was not charged was because he set himself for the tackle and JWH lower his body for impact rather than Dwyer launching himself into JWH's chin.

Dwyer, pushed UP, definitely Launched, have another look.

[Johnny Tobin]

Could you imagine how we would be blowing up if we lost and had our season finished?

On top of all the raw deals we have copped this year I would have seriously considered walking away from the game.

In incompetence of the refs is driving me to distraction.

[Guest]

Shove that up your arse sheens and farrah!

[Guest]

just listening to the NRL news with John Gibbs and Freddy and they were saying the match review panel findings was that it should have been a penalty for the hit on JWH, the reason Dwyer was not charged was because he set himself for the tackle and JWH lower his body for impact rather than Dwyer launching himself into JWH's chin.

Gibbs said that same thing on his show last night. Funny how the papers don't report on that part of the match review panel's comments