Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fox sports call

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Johnny Tobin View Post
    How can you say they were the better side? They looked the better side to anyone that doesn't understand the rules but I would never agree with your statement.
    Well said. It was that bad that if it wasnt a GF It actually would have been funny

    On another note Could you imagine the uproar had we been on the front end of these calls ?
    When you trust your television
    what you get is what you got
    Cause when they own the information
    they can bend it all they want

    John Mayer

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post
      but we got beat 32-8, and they were the better side overall across the 80 minutes
      You just don't get it dude. At 14-nil I highly doubt Smith's halftime instructions would have been to throw the slippery ball around from inside our own half. Roosters made 200 tackles in that second half by constantly spilling the ball.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post
        but they did Mario

        go and look at the actual papers rather than just sprouting bullshit
        Listen here you dropkick. There was small mention of it yes.However had we been the recipient instead of being on the recieving end of such dubious calls The uproar would have gone on until kick off of rnd 1 and even beyond.

        You ****s went on about the Tigers game for almost a week
        When you trust your television
        what you get is what you got
        Cause when they own the information
        they can bend it all they want

        John Mayer

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by melon.... View Post
          Look at my avatar. Thats a shot from footage. Did the papers have that plastered on the back page? if so where? When?

          The media swept it all under the carpet choosing instead to focus on the de-choke-ification of the chokers.
          Mate it was in a corner of a page aboutt wo pages after the back page.Had it been us as the recipient it would have been front and back page
          When you trust your television
          what you get is what you got
          Cause when they own the information
          they can bend it all they want

          John Mayer

          Comment


          • #50
            TOK,

            You may as well say it was Saints Turn in 2010. It seems thats all this Take Turns NRL is...a merry-go-round of favorites. That would make more sense than the refereeing didnt effect the result.

            Next year it will be the Titans...guaranteed. We must share around the spoils. And the year after it would probably be great for the NRL if Nth Queensland win it.
            Alcohol never solved any life problems.....then again neither did milk.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
              Listen here you dropkick. There was small mention of it yes.However had we been the recipient instead of being on the recieving end of such dubious calls The uproar would have gone on until kick off of rnd 1 and even beyond.

              You ****s went on about the Tigers game for almost a week
              You know whats worse? That used tampon Rothfield kept going on about the scrum and completely ignored the headshot in JWH tackle. The moron was quoting Gillespie "the greatest hit in a decade"....because morons like Rothfield dont have a brain cell to formulate a thought of their own.
              Alcohol never solved any life problems.....then again neither did milk.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by melon.... View Post
                You know whats worse? That used tampon Rothfield kept going on about the scrum and completely ignored the headshot in JWH tackle. The moron was quoting Gillespie "the greatest hit in a decade"....because morons like Rothfield dont have a brain cell to formulate a thought of their own.
                Yeah i remeber that very well
                When you trust your television
                what you get is what you got
                Cause when they own the information
                they can bend it all they want

                John Mayer

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by melon.... View Post
                  TOK,

                  You may as well say it was Saints Turn in 2010. It seems thats all this Take Turns NRL is...a merry-go-round of favorites. That would make more sense than the refereeing didnt effect the result.

                  Next year it will be the Titans...guaranteed. We must share around the spoils. And the year after it would probably be great for the NRL if Nth Queensland win it.
                  Just hope its not Souths turn!

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by dice View Post
                    You just don't get it dude. At 14-nil I highly doubt Smith's halftime instructions would have been to throw the slippery ball around from inside our own half. Roosters made 200 tackles in that second half by constantly spilling the ball.
                    following that logic dude, any time a refereeing error leads to a try being incorrectly awarded, there's no point playing the rest of the match, because whatever happens after that try would have been different if the error hadn't been made

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by melon.... View Post
                      You know whats worse? That used tampon Rothfield kept going on about the scrum and completely ignored the headshot in JWH tackle. The moron was quoting Gillespie "the greatest hit in a decade"....because morons like Rothfield dont have a brain cell to formulate a thought of their own.
                      There was complete disregard for the fact that JWH was hit on the chin.

                      But no, let's run an article saying "the greatest hit of the decade".
                      Born and bred in the eastern suburbs.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
                        Listen here you dropkick. There was small mention of it yes.However had we been the recipient instead of being on the recieving end of such dubious calls The uproar would have gone on until kick off of rnd 1 and even beyond.

                        You ****s went on about the Tigers game for almost a week
                        Andy, I think you should spend the off season addressing your language issues, as well as trying to overcome your pathological propensity for creating imaginery conversations with players

                        and finding some better things to do with your kids than crowding around the computer on the weekends. Like I said, take them to Timezone or the Zoo, or something

                        let me know how you go

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          It was inevitably going to happen. It was promised when they merged and it is finally over. Unfortunatey we were the ones that suffered the end result.

                          Now that the contract is complete, the ex-Dragon Finch is moving on after completing his agenda, let's hope we can get a bit of normality back on the field and in the video box from all the men in pink and enjoy rugby league again.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post
                            following that logic dude, any time a refereeing error leads to a try being incorrectly awarded, there's no point playing the rest of the match, because whatever happens after that try would have been different if the error hadn't been made
                            Nobody expects the game to be stopped and checking video footage constantly. The Morris incident was blatant, the Minichiello incident was blatant and ref was right there, the Perrett incident was blatant and view by video ref Harrigan.

                            It is not like any of these incidents were 50/50 decisions or benefit of the doubt that went against us. The refs were clearly under instructions to let the game "flow" by ignoring 50/50 calls and they made a mockery of it by ignoring more blatant violations.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by BUDDY View Post
                              It was inevitably going to happen. It was promised when they merged and it is finally over. Unfortunatey we were the ones that suffered the end result.

                              Now that the contract is complete, the ex-Dragon Finch is moving on after completing his agenda, let's hope we can get a bit of normality back on the field and in the video box from all the men in pink and enjoy rugby league again.
                              Lets go one better. Lets get rid of the Video Ref. if you cant get it right with the benefit of slow mo replays, then yo may as well g with what the on field guys see or miss. That way they have the benefit of being prone to human error. When the video ref cant get it right whats the point?
                              Alcohol never solved any life problems.....then again neither did milk.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by dice View Post
                                Nobody expects the game to be stopped and checking video footage constantly. The Morris incident was blatant, the Minichiello incident was blatant and ref was right there, the Perrett incident was blatant and view by video ref Harrigan.

                                It is not like any of these incidents were 50/50 decisions or benefit of the doubt that went against us. The refs were clearly under instructions to let the game "flow" by ignoring 50/50 calls and they made a mockery of it by ignoring more blatant violations.
                                so then what's your point?

                                you've also ignored Perret knocking the ball out of Creagh's hands on his own 30 - should have been penalty Dragons, instead we get scrum

                                Nightingales knock on in first half - wasn't a knock on

                                and Anasta's try

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X