If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The only tosser I have come across on this site is you.
Not many on here liked you before this But I am certain now the few that did Will have changed your tunes after your attacks on loyal passionate Roosters supporters such as Melon and JT
the crew of dumb, deluded conspiracy theorist haters who are, quite frankly, an embarrassment to other Roosters supporters
indeed, you are his faithful lacky
now go write a whining letter to an editor somewhere, you tosser
Most are embarrassing conspiracy theorists. But to use a bloke who is battling an illness to make your point, well that is truely bottom of the barrell.
all the nice words that have been said about Jim and what a helpful, great bloke he is
if you had a stroke Bruce, there'd be none of that
Rest assured TOK, If Melon ever did have a stroke (which I hope never happens) then I and most others on here would rally to support him immediately. He would not lack for anything.
And that's because supporters like he and Jimmy are one of us, they are part of the extended Roosters family. You are not.
NC
Supporting the RW&B, through good times and bad times.
Rest assured TOK, If Melon ever did have a stroke (which I hope never happens) then I and most others on here would rally to support him immediately. He would not lack for anything.
And that's because supporters like he and Jimmy are one of us, they are part of the extended Roosters family. You are not.
the crew of dumb, deluded conspiracy theorist haters who are, quite frankly, an embarrassment to other Roosters supporters
indeed, you are his faithful lacky
now go write a whining letter to an editor somewhere, you tosser
TOK I must admit I actually enjoy reading many of your posts and your to-and-fro with the "establishment" on here. The apparent club which exists on this site amuses me to no end... some of them are certainly deluded conspiracy theorists, others with noted tunnel vision, and the odd person with a desire to make themselves feel superior in their little online world. Many however do have an incredible insight into the game and the workings of the club which I appreciate. At the end of the day however your choice of making your point using this particular story is extremely poor form, and I would think you know this yourself but are probably too proud to acknowledge it or to apologise. I do at the very least feel an apology to the man himself is required, and whilst it won't mean much to them I am sure, an apology to his friends.
TOK I must admit I actually enjoy reading many of your posts and your to-and-fro with the "establishment" on here. The apparent club which exists on this site amuses me to no end... some of them are certainly deluded conspiracy theorists, others with noted tunnel vision, and the odd person with a desire to make themselves feel superior in their little online world. Many however do have an incredible insight into the game and the workings of the club which I appreciate. At the end of the day however your choice of making your point using this particular story is extremely poor form, and I would think you know this yourself but are probably too proud to acknowledge it or to apologise. I do at the very least feel an apology to the man himself is required, and whilst it won't mean much to them I am sure, an apology to his friends.
Dubai, if you can give me a legitimate reason as to why simply reposting the story here (a story that in itself probably gave Jim a decent lift) and sarcastically pointing out that the telegraph is not entirely anti Roosters is "poor form", then I will do as you have asked
TOK I must admit I actually enjoy reading many of your posts and your to-and-fro with the "establishment" on here. The apparent club which exists on this site amuses me to no end... some of them are certainly deluded conspiracy theorists, others with noted tunnel vision, and the odd person with a desire to make themselves feel superior in their little online world. Many however do have an incredible insight into the game and the workings of the club which I appreciate. At the end of the day however your choice of making your point using this particular story is extremely poor form, and I would think you know this yourself but are probably too proud to acknowledge it or to apologise. I do at the very least feel an apology to the man himself is required, and whilst it won't mean much to them I am sure, an apology to his friends.
This is exactly what i was getting at. The establishment as you put it can be tired and boring at times, yet they are passionate about the Roosters.
To use this bloke as your example, to make your point is some of your worst stuff yet.
Dubai, if you can give me a legitimate reason as to why simply reposting the story here (a story that in itself probably gave Jim a decent lift) and sarcastically pointing out that the telegraph is not entirely anti Roosters is "poor form", then I will do as you have asked
no replies from the morons please, just Dubai
Probably because you chose an illness to make your point. How about you stand at the end of his hospital bed and show him the lovely article your rag has written on him. Then say to him that "look they aren't that bad are they?"
I would think he would like to shove it down your throat. I would say there could be another article this year to make a point.
I am sad that just because Voldemort Gould and our Heroic Roosters led by Freddie and his massive paycheque won the war for the loyal forces we are subject to the vitriolic bile from the forces of evil.
Comment