SMH, comes to aide an old ally

[Guest]

Brain only gets me when a dope like you needs some slapping around!

You have some kind of mouth on you Bejerk.

[Guest]

You have some kind of mouth on you Bejerk.

gday mate!

[Andrew Walker]

I notice how quiet that knob jockey cock fingering tok has gone in here now that Brain has produced the written evidence

[Guest]

I notice how quiet that knob jockey cock fingering tok has gone in here now that Brain has produced the written evidence

written evidence?

speculation from a journo that you'd bag the shit out of if they were talking about the Roosters

I think not Andy

also, what on earth is "cock fingering"?

[stephenj]

i think this thread ios now pronounced dead

[Guest]

written evidence?

speculation from a journo that you'd bag the shit out of if they were talking about the Roosters

I think not Andy

also, what on earth is "cock fingering"?

C'mon you know what it is. It's what you and Hadley do to each other sitting around thinking up shit to say about the Roosters.

Chook.

[Andrew Walker]

C'mon you know what it is. It's what you and Hadley do to each other sitting around thinking up shit to say about the Roosters.

Chook.

lhehehehe God that made me laugh when you originally printed that in a thread you started. I was waiting to use the expression on someone I thought to myself who better than than the orinal cock fingerer himself tok

[The Brain]

One of TOK's very own

I was too drunk to remember anything, says Brett Stewart

Article from: The Daily Telegraph
By Josh Massoud and Paul Kent
March 10, 2009 12:00am

MANLY fullback Brett Stewart was so drunk he cannot remember allegedly attacking a teenage girl but witnesses claim the footballer had to be pulled off the 17-year-old.

Police witnesses told The Daily Telegraph Stewart exited the taxi that had ferried him home from Manly's season launch and crash tackled the girl. Shocked onlookers said they had to pull him off the girl, who had been smoking a cigarette outside her home.


The Daily Telegraph has learned the diabetic Manly star was so drunk he could not immediately remember what took place.

Sources close to the inquiry revealed Stewart had consumed so much alcohol beforehand that he was unable to recall details of the alleged incident when taken into custody by police about 8pm last Friday.

When asked to confirm the allegations, his lawyer Geoff Bellew replied: "I am unable to comment about that because it's a matter of client privilege." But Mr Bellew denied suggestions Stewart had declined to be interviewed because he was too drunk. "That's absolutely, totally wrong," he said.

Stewart has since denied allegations that he sexually assaulted the girl at a North Manly apartment complex.

As the investigation continues, it emerged the Sea Eagles are also considering defying the NRL's wishes and a groundswell of public opinion by playing Stewart - even if he is charged by police.

Chief executive Grant Mayer refused to comment on his future yesterday. "There's no doubt that if things progress throughout the week the board will meet and discuss it. At this stage it is an allegation," he said.

Privately, the club has already sought legal opinion and was told the NRL has no legal standing to ban Stewart from playing.

If charged, it is understood the Sea Eagles are prepared to continue playing him until he faces court, as other players have done in the past.

The NRL's stance on whether players should be stood down depends heavily on the players response to the accusations - in this instance, Stewart has denied the accusation.

NRL boss David Gallop said: "If it was a clearly established fact that a player had committed a sexual assault he would not be playing."

Stewart declined to be interviewed after being arrested and was released without charge.

The 24-year-old had spent the entire afternoon at Manly's 2009 season launch, where he was spotted drinking heavily with team mates.

He returned to the complex - where he also lives - in a taxi about 7.30pm. The girl and her father, both of whom cannot be named for legal reasons, have said she was smoking a cigarette at the front of the complex when Stewart arrived.

Stewart was later arrested and taken to Dee Why police station. He made his first appearance since Friday at Manly training yesterday.

Sea Eagles coach Des Hasler will today name him at fullback for Saturday clash against the Bulldogs.

His on-going selection comes as the Balmain Tigers stood down five NSW Cup players who allegedly raped a 23-year-old woman on the Sunshine Coast after a trial match two Saturday ago. The Daily Telegraph understands all five players have been put on ice until the outcome of the investigation.

[Guest]

One of TOK's very own

I was too drunk to remember anything, says Brett Stewart

Article from: The Daily Telegraph
By Josh Massoud and Paul Kent
March 10, 2009 12:00am

MANLY fullback Brett Stewart was so drunk he cannot remember allegedly attacking a teenage girl but witnesses claim the footballer had to be pulled off the 17-year-old.

Police witnesses told The Daily Telegraph Stewart exited the taxi that had ferried him home from Manly's season launch and crash tackled the girl. Shocked onlookers said they had to pull him off the girl, who had been smoking a cigarette outside her home.


The Daily Telegraph has learned the diabetic Manly star was so drunk he could not immediately remember what took place.

Sources close to the inquiry revealed Stewart had consumed so much alcohol beforehand that he was unable to recall details of the alleged incident when taken into custody by police about 8pm last Friday.

When asked to confirm the allegations, his lawyer Geoff Bellew replied: "I am unable to comment about that because it's a matter of client privilege." But Mr Bellew denied suggestions Stewart had declined to be interviewed because he was too drunk. "That's absolutely, totally wrong," he said.

Stewart has since denied allegations that he sexually assaulted the girl at a North Manly apartment complex.

As the investigation continues, it emerged the Sea Eagles are also considering defying the NRL's wishes and a groundswell of public opinion by playing Stewart - even if he is charged by police.

Chief executive Grant Mayer refused to comment on his future yesterday. "There's no doubt that if things progress throughout the week the board will meet and discuss it. At this stage it is an allegation," he said.

Privately, the club has already sought legal opinion and was told the NRL has no legal standing to ban Stewart from playing.

If charged, it is understood the Sea Eagles are prepared to continue playing him until he faces court, as other players have done in the past.

The NRL's stance on whether players should be stood down depends heavily on the players response to the accusations - in this instance, Stewart has denied the accusation.

NRL boss David Gallop said: "If it was a clearly established fact that a player had committed a sexual assault he would not be playing."

Stewart declined to be interviewed after being arrested and was released without charge.

The 24-year-old had spent the entire afternoon at Manly's 2009 season launch, where he was spotted drinking heavily with team mates.

He returned to the complex - where he also lives - in a taxi about 7.30pm. The girl and her father, both of whom cannot be named for legal reasons, have said she was smoking a cigarette at the front of the complex when Stewart arrived.

Stewart was later arrested and taken to Dee Why police station. He made his first appearance since Friday at Manly training yesterday.

Sea Eagles coach Des Hasler will today name him at fullback for Saturday clash against the Bulldogs.

His on-going selection comes as the Balmain Tigers stood down five NSW Cup players who allegedly raped a 23-year-old woman on the Sunshine Coast after a trial match two Saturday ago. The Daily Telegraph understands all five players have been put on ice until the outcome of the investigation.

doesn't back up the original claim by pearceswhatever one bit

funny how you'll treat this sort of journalistic speculation as gospel when it suits, but dismiss it entirely and bag the shit out of whoever wrote it when it's about the Roosters

you'd be better off sticking to making up stories about Souths players that yuo pretend to have spoken with

like Andy does

lol

[Vasco]

Nothing like a knockout blow.

[Guest]

doesn't back up the original claim by pearceswhatever one bit

funny how you'll treat this sort of journalistic speculation as gospel when it suits, but dismiss it entirely and bag the shit out of whoever wrote it when it's about the Roosters

you'd be better off sticking to making up stories about Souths players that yuo pretend to have spoken with

like Andy does

lol

You said that the '' I don't remember'' excuse was never used.....did you not?

[Andrew Walker]

doesn't back up the original claim by pearceswhatever one bit

funny how you'll treat this sort of journalistic speculation as gospel when it suits, but dismiss it entirely and bag the shit out of whoever wrote it when it's about the Roosters

you'd be better off sticking to making up stories about Souths players that yuo pretend to have spoken with

like Andy does

lol

Nobody said it is gospel What I said was that this I dont remeber line was trotted out in the media This is something you denied. Whether or not Stewart said such a thing is not the issue What is the issue now is that you challenged myself or pwnm to find this in print Well the Brain has kindly done this and you have been shown up to be the cock fingering jibberer we all know you are

[Guest]

Nobody said it is gospel What I said was that this I dont remeber line was trotted out in the media This is something you denied. Whether or not Stewart said such a thing is not the issue What is the issue now is that you challenged myself or pwnm to find this in print Well the Brain has kindly done this and you have been shown up to be the cock fingering jibberer we all know you are

Just throwing it out there.......My early front-runner for post of the year!

[Guest]

Nobody said it is gospel What I said was that this I dont remeber line was trotted out in the media This is something you denied. Whether or not Stewart said such a thing is not the issue What is the issue now is that you challenged myself or pwnm to find this in print Well the Brain has kindly done this and you have been shown up to be the cock fingering jibberer we all know you are

Andy, I know you struggle with things a bit mate

you said

"The I dont remember a thing was reportedly said for some time by Stewart and his legal team"

that article contains no statements from Stewart or his legal team

pls post one article where either stewart or his legal team say the "I don't remember thing"

not "The Daily Telegraph has learned the diabetic Manly star was so drunk he could not immediately remember what took place."

see, nothing statements like that from journos are what you bag - but only when they're about the Roosters

and before you got involved in the discussion, the orginal claim from pearceswhatever was

The excuses from stewart were remarkable

" i was too drunk too be held responsible"
" i honestly cant remember what happened"
" it was consensual"
" it was a set up "

still waiting for pearces to post links to stewart making those statements

[Andrew Walker]

Andy, I know you struggle with things a bit mate

you said

"The I dont remember a thing was reportedly said for some time by Stewart and his legal team"

that article contains no statements from Stewart or his legal team

pls post one article where either stewart or his legal team say the "I don't remember thing"

not "The Daily Telegraph has learned the diabetic Manly star was so drunk he could not immediately remember what took place."

see, nothing statements like that from journos are what you bag - but only when they're about the Roosters

and before you got involved in the discussion, the orginal claim from pearceswhatever was

The excuses from stewart were remarkable

" i was too drunk too be held responsible"
" i honestly cant remember what happened"
" it was consensual"
" it was a set up "

still waiting for pearces to post links to stewart making those statements

You remind me of those Japnese fighters who were still fighting the war in the pacific long after it was lost

As I said you have been well and truly shown up for being the cock fingering jibberer you are.You are probably aabout the only one on here who doesnt think this