Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SMH, comes to aide an old ally

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post
    Andy, I know you struggle with things a bit mate

    you said

    "The I dont remember a thing was reportedly said for some time by Stewart and his legal team"

    that article contains no statements from Stewart or his legal team

    pls post one article where either stewart or his legal team say the "I don't remember thing"

    not "The Daily Telegraph has learned the diabetic Manly star was so drunk he could not immediately remember what took place."

    see, nothing statements like that from journos are what you bag - but only when they're about the Roosters

    and before you got involved in the discussion, the orginal claim from pearceswhatever was

    The excuses from stewart were remarkable

    " i was too drunk too be held responsible"
    " i honestly cant remember what happened"
    " it was consensual"
    " it was a set up "


    still waiting for pearces to post links to stewart making those statements
    So what you are saying here is that the only reference to stewart "not remembering" and such is from an article, from the tellucrap stating no concrete source as to where these comments have come from???

    So basically, you have there alone, regardless of the team, proven that the Tellucrap use un-substantiated sources to provide sensationalist propaganda to the duped masses !

    Delecto Oriens est odio Meridianus
    To love Easts is to hate Souffs

    Originally posted by Bill Shankley, Liverpool FC
    At a football club, there’s a holy trinity – the players, the manager and the supporters. Directors don’t come into it. They are only there to sign the cheques.
    Originally posted by Andy Raymond Commentating Souffs V Manly 18/04/09
    The fireworks at the Easter show are making more noise than the crowd tonight

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
      You remind me of those Japnese fighters who were still figting the war in the paicific long after it was lost

      As I said you have beenh well and truly shown up for being the coc kingering jibberer you are.You are probably aabout the only one on here who doesnt think this
      You will find that some of what Pearcey boy said were true,,,,but you will also find that the Daily Astonisher removed those articles.......
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe

      Comment


      • #78
        and another thing Andy

        for an excuse to be "trotted out in the media", the excuse needs to come from the person who's been accused of something (or his legal team)

        not a journalist saying "The Daily Telegraph understands that excuse such and such is being used"

        that's not Stewart, or his legal team, making any excuses

        certainly not the 4 different excuses that Pearces claimed were made by Stewart

        again, pls find an article where Stewart or his legal team "trot out" any excuse whatsoever

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by The Brain View Post
          You will find that some of what Pearcey boy said were true,,,,but you will also find that the Daily Astonisher removed those articles.......
          I believe that Thats why I wouldnt waste my time searching myself
          When you trust your television
          what you get is what you got
          Cause when they own the information
          they can bend it all they want

          John Mayer

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by The Brain View Post
            You will find that some of what Pearcey boy said were true,,,,but you will also find that the Daily Astonisher removed those articles.......
            lol

            yep, just like how you spoke to Sam

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post
              and another thing Andy

              for an excuse to be "trotted out in the media", the excuse needs to come from the person who's been accused of something (or his legal team)

              not a journalist saying "The Daily Telegraph understands that excuse such and such is being used"

              that's not Stewart, or his legal team, making any excuses

              certainly not the 4 different excuses that Pearces claimed were made by Stewart

              again, pls find an article where Stewart or his legal team "trot out" any excuse whatsoever
              Give up cockfingerer the war is over You have been soundly shown up as the cock fingering jibberer we all know you to be. Calm down give yourself an early mark and go have a few beers at the pub and after that drive home like you usually do With a bit of luck we might read about you getting done for DUI
              When you trust your television
              what you get is what you got
              Cause when they own the information
              they can bend it all they want

              John Mayer

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
                Give up cockfingerer the war is over You have been soundly shown up as the cock fingering jibberer we all know you to be. Calm down give yourself an early mark and go have a few beers at the pub and after that drive home like you usually do With a bit of luck we might read about you getting done for DUI
                only if you tell me what "cock fingering" is

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post
                  only if you tell me what "cock fingering" is
                  As Chook said You know what it is. Its what you and Hadley get up to when thinking about shit to make up about Easts
                  When you trust your television
                  what you get is what you got
                  Cause when they own the information
                  they can bend it all they want

                  John Mayer

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post
                    lol

                    yep, just like how you spoke to Sam
                    Nothing to laugh out .The web is the Web you can punch in your combinations and it will lead you to an article.

                    I was lead to the Tele's articles only find them "removed" There is about 4 articles on Brett Stewart that have been removed ? Is this because he was found not guilty .
                    Do you realise ...and I am guessing here that Brett Stewart's lawyers highly intelligently used you guys in Brett's favour of course .............all worded carefully to avoid law suits .
                    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      One thing that had me puzzled with this case from day one is that Stewart and his legal team did not enter a plea for some time.

                      If Stewart denied the allegations, then I wonder why he did not enter a plea of not guilty. In criminal cases, this usually occurs when the defence want to see the evidence against the accused before advising him/her on the plea. If Stewart was clear on the facts, why did they not enter a guilty plea from day one

                      My suspicion is that there is merit to the "I don't remember" theory and his team were waiting to see what evidence was dished out to orchestrate his defence.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Mad Morley View Post
                        One thing that had me puzzled with this case from day one is that Stewart and his legal team did not enter a plea for some time.

                        If Stewart denied the allegations, then I wonder why he did not enter a plea of not guilty. In criminal cases, this usually occurs when the defence want to see the evidence against the accused before advising him/her on the plea. If Stewart was clear on the facts, why did they not enter a guilty plea from day one

                        My suspicion is that there is merit to the "I don't remember" theory and his team were waiting to see what evidence was dished out to orchestrate his defence.
                        ..........They were clever as it stands Brett Stewart is a free man and not guilty you have to achknowledge that in the end .
                        Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by The Brain View Post
                          ..........They were clever as it stands Brett Stewart is a free man and not guilty you have to achknowledge that in the end .
                          No doubting that. Money buys you good lawyers

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by Mad Morley View Post
                            No doubting that. Money buys you good lawyers

                            I wish Papers would focus on real crimes than piss head misdemeanors.

                            ...Then we have a government that in a short space of time is ripping the economy apart but know put Carneys face on the front we may sell a few papers more in the East .Carney will get his verdict in court just like Bourbon Becky .
                            Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Journalists get used to promote what ever agenda some one has...............Do you really believe Charlie Sheen is off his rocker ? or just a piss pot that gets out of hand.
                              Belive me 90 % of the Charlie Sheen thing is a publicity stunt.Hollywood at its best.That is the word on the street.
                              Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by The Brain View Post
                                Journalists get used to promote what ever agenda some one has...............Do you really believe Charlie Sheen is off his rocker ? or just a piss pot that gets out of hand.
                                Belive me 90 % of the Charlie Sheen thing is a publicity stunt.Hollywood at its best.That is the word on the street.
                                It's a WINNING stunt by Sheen !

                                Delecto Oriens est odio Meridianus
                                To love Easts is to hate Souffs

                                Originally posted by Bill Shankley, Liverpool FC
                                At a football club, there’s a holy trinity – the players, the manager and the supporters. Directors don’t come into it. They are only there to sign the cheques.
                                Originally posted by Andy Raymond Commentating Souffs V Manly 18/04/09
                                The fireworks at the Easter show are making more noise than the crowd tonight

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X