Tweet
Was at the ground didn't see it too well,thought it was benefit of the doubt at worst? Any thoughts?
-
-
Mate he didn't ground the ball on/over the line..Originally posted by Ghost View Post
He was held up..It was a massive play by the doggiezzz.. -
Wasn't a try, didn't get it down until after the ref had blown for the replay. He was very close to getting it down though, really unlucky.
Comment
-
I say the correct call was made he fell short and if their was doubt it should have gone to the bulldogs great defence i must say.Comment
-
No try.Comment
-
We lost and not thanks to the ref or bad calls.
Comment
-
ABC commentators thought dogs touched the ball just before BJ picked it up. At worst should have been 6-to-go for the chooks. Video ref conveniently missed that one. Big call.Originally posted by ROC181 View PostComment
-
Correct call. Would of being a shocker if given.
That being said, i have seen some pearlers in the last couple of years in regards to VR decisions.Comment
-
Fair enough,shit ground to watch footy & we rarely play well there.Comment
-
Touched a single blade of white grass, if at all.
If they'd awarded it, we'd be hearing about it all week.Comment
-
No try.Comment
-
You are finally making sense you silly old fool.Originally posted by Rooster Cogburn View PostComment
-
farken crucial one that one .Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universeComment
-
Yeah but the tries they scored in the 2nd half is school boys stuff. Horrible defense. Sorry I shouldn't denigrate the Schoolboys comp, they tackle better. And here I am thinking Parra were bad.Originally posted by Tootsie View Post
BTW, try that SKD scored from that bomb where Anasta tapped it forward I didn't think we'd get that but we did.Comment
-
It was a good game of footy, could have gone either way, we were just one try short in the wash upComment
Comment