Archer & Out

[Guest]

"donald rumsfeld has nothing on me."

lol!!

[Guest]

A better quality vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEHX42wqINE

I laugh more and more with each time i see it haha

[Guest]

ive got a better one but it wont let me upload it

[Guest]

Why did Chris post his email address. I reckon Tries Off Kicks has some real cojones to stick around when people know who they are

[Guest]

http://flickcabin.com/public/view/96230
http://flickcabin.com/public/view/96231

[Guest]

Yeah like the other night when MAnly & Vermin were playing the commentators mentioned Manly hadn't been given a penalty yet and it was 66 miutes into the game...all of a sudden they get given 3 penalties by the ref a couple of minutes after the commentators pointed that out...one was deserved and the other 2 were overkill...he missed a few more deserved ones early into the game but Souff's got 6 given to them during that period for offences they too were guilty of...it smelt to me...I wonder what would have happened had the commentators not said nnothing...

If you believe that the referees, whilst running around and speaking to the players non-stop during the game, that they're listening in to the channel 9 call to see when they should blow penalties, then how can you even follow Rugby League? Why do you spend money attending games if the officials are as corrupt as that? How can you follow a team in a competition that is so corrupt and ****ed up as that?

Don't you feel stupid spending your hard earned money consuming a sport where the outcomes in the contest are decided upon by corrupt officials?

[Guest]

If you believe that the referees, whilst running around and speaking to the players non-stop during the game, that they're listening in to the channel 9 call to see when they should blow penalties, then how can you even follow Rugby League? Why do you spend money attending games if the officials are as corrupt as that? How can you follow a team in a competition that is so corrupt and ****ed up as that?

Don't you feel stupid spending your hard earned money consuming a sport where the outcomes in the contest are decided upon by corrupt officials?

No I don't feel stupid as I'll give you some facts below...

For starters the video ref would be watching televised vision upstairs and he could've made the call to them...it was only last year that a ref asked into his microphone what the penalty count was during a game... and it made the media on why he would ask that question etc etc & Bill Harrigan defended him on Talking Sports Show that he fronts up to every Monday night when they threw that question to him to answer...

He answered that the question was asked to the video ref who has televised vision in front of him and stats available...his answer as to why ask the question about penalty count mid game was some good spin doctoring...

By the way the ref's boss came out today as they did look over the ref's performance in the Manly v Souff's game and admitted a penalty earlier could have been given...but I think they are just spin doctoring again...

I do presume some refs will have favourites...I worked with an ex NRL ref for several years...on the piss he did make statements that showed me their is favouritism at times...I have first hand knowledge and heard it from an official themselves...corrupt ?...I would more liken it to turning a blind eye to something a favourite has done in a game to penalising the non favourite for the same thing...and that can turn or influence games...

Oh and by the way you've made several statements pertaining to me that are wrong and way off the mark...think before you offer me advise next time and make sure it might be of some help to me rather than a stab in the dark hoping you've guessed right...

Cheers

[Guest]

No I don't feel stupid as I'll give you some facts below...

For starters the video ref would be watching televised vision upstairs and he could've made the call to them...it was only last year that a ref asked into his microphone what the penalty count was during a game... and it made the media on why he would ask that question etc etc & Bill Harrigan defended him on Talking Sports Show that he fronts up to every Monday night when they threw that question to him to answer...

He answered that the question was asked to the video ref who has televised vision in front of him and stats available...his answer as to why ask the question about penalty count mid game was some good spin doctoring...

By the way the ref's boss came out today as they did look over the ref's performance in the Manly v Souff's game and admitted a penalty earlier could have been given...but I think they are just spin doctoring again...

I do presume some refs will have favourites...I worked with an ex NRL ref for several years...on the piss he did make statements that showed me their is favouritism at times...I have first hand knowledge and heard it from an official themselves...corrupt ?...I would more liken it to turning a blind eye to something a favourite has done in a game to penalising the non favourite for the same thing...and that can turn or influence games...

Oh and by the way you've made several statements pertaining to me that are wrong and way off the mark...think before you offer me advise next time and make sure it might be of some help to me rather than a stab in the dark hoping you've guessed right...

Cheers

stabbing in the dark? No, just going on what you said

you said that you suspect that the referees in the manly souths game gave penalties to manly on the basis of having heard the channel 9 commentators saying that manly hadn't been given a penalty yet.

If a referee does that, that's corrupt

Given that you've subsequently said that you don't feel stupid following a sport that you believe is corrupt, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that you have no issue being screwed over by corrupt officials whilst you consume your Rugby League

[Guest]

No I don't feel stupid as I'll give you some facts below...

For starters the video ref would be watching televised vision upstairs and he could've made the call to them...it was only last year that a ref asked into his microphone what the penalty count was during a game... and it made the media on why he would ask that question etc etc & Bill Harrigan defended him on Talking Sports Show that he fronts up to every Monday night when they threw that question to him to answer...

He answered that the question was asked to the video ref who has televised vision in front of him and stats available...his answer as to why ask the question about penalty count mid game was some good spin doctoring...

By the way the ref's boss came out today as they did look over the ref's performance in the Manly v Souff's game and admitted a penalty earlier could have been given...but I think they are just spin doctoring again...

I do presume some refs will have favourites...I worked with an ex NRL ref for several years...on the piss he did make statements that showed me their is favouritism at times...I have first hand knowledge and heard it from an official themselves...corrupt ?...I would more liken it to turning a blind eye to something a favourite has done in a game to penalising the non favourite for the same thing...and that can turn or influence games...

Oh and by the way you've made several statements pertaining to me that are wrong and way off the mark...think before you offer me advise next time and make sure it might be of some help to me rather than a stab in the dark hoping you've guessed right...

Cheers

How on earth would you know that? Don't the video refs just ask for the particular angles they need shown from the broadcaster when the time arises?

[Guest]

stabbing in the dark? No, just going on what you said

you said that you suspect that the referees in the manly souths game gave penalties to manly on the basis of having heard the channel 9 commentators saying that manly hadn't been given a penalty yet.

If a referee does that, that's corrupt

Given that you've subsequently said that you don't feel stupid following a sport that you believe is corrupt, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that you have no issue being screwed over by corrupt officials whilst you consume your Rugby League

Thats corrupt brother

[Guest]

Originally posted by supermario

The great thing is, that section of play will be show for MANY years on numerous highlight reels. So we can have the continued pleasure of laughing at archer for many many years!

I will never erase this game! There will be days when I will need to watch it again...and again.....
The sight of Archer landing on his arse while trying to obstruct TC is better than any anti-depressant!!!!

[Guest]

is Anybody going to compliment my fantastic GIF making abilities?

[Chook Norris]

is Anybody going to compliment my fantastic GIF making abilities?

reposted, love it mate

[Guest]

Just on Nathan Rees for a moment, for SteveJ.

He wasn't ineffectual, he was nobbled by the momsers and gonifs in the Terrigal mob. He wanted to destroy the power of the upper house thugees, who were all mentioned in that Herald story yesterday.

Given half the chance, he could have directed Labor towards...well, not a win but less of a shameful drubbing.

He really should have been leader, not that Brazillian Robertson.

Lol That would probably be the first time I have seen that terminology used on a sports forum.

[Guest]

reposted, love it mate

cheers chook