Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Officials.....will cost us

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post
    What a sad case you are

    Before a ball is even kicked in the match, you're whining about the ****ing referees

    Do you even enjoy the sport, or do you just like to whinge and moan about how hard done by we are every ****ing day?

    Seriously you're not too bright...you must be Rothfield...I'm convinced now...

    If you painted your whole face white apart from your nose which looks really bright red in the paper when they have a photo of your head...and put a curly haired wig on you'd finally look like the clown you are...

    You're nose looks really red in the photos...

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by past glory View Post
      playing the man again, mclennan,the computer man from spews ltd-what a farken joke-
      playing the farken man all the time.
      if you were a roosters supporter you know that we are continually farkt over every game everytime, you stupid carnt, you mealey mouthed computer nerd.
      Why dont you come down to cafe foveaux at about 2.30 so that I can punch the farken shit outta you,you miserable little computer nerdy little c u n t .
      see you there wanka-ask for jim

      That cracked me up.
      I had visions of Happy Gilmore.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by past glory View Post
        playing the man again, mclennan,the computer man from spews ltd-what a farken joke-
        playing the farken man all the time.
        if you were a roosters supporter you know that we are continually farkt over every game everytime, you stupid carnt, you mealey mouthed computer nerd.
        Why dont you come down to cafe foveaux at about 2.30 so that I can punch the farken shit outta you,you miserable little computer nerdy little c u n t .
        see you there wanka-ask for jim
        We don't go into that shop - the food's greasy and shit

        with your non stop whinging and whining and complaining about every referee and every ****ing game and how we got screwed again you're as bad as the worst supporter from any club, and you're an embarrassment to the Roosters

        stop playing the man yourself, stop whinging about every ****ing thing, and stop sending me pm's with your stupid gossip about Peter Doust and Brett Kenny and god knows what else

        what, do you think I'm put your "late mail" in the paper?

        lol

        Comment


        • #34
          News dickhead. Youre a complete disgrace. Jims done more to help thisclub than you ever will . Go ****ing support saints already.
          Alcohol never solved any life problems.....then again neither did milk.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post
            We don't go into that shop - the food's greasy and shit

            with your non stop whinging and whining and complaining about every referee and every ****ing game and how we got screwed again you're as bad as the worst supporter from any club, and you're an embarrassment to the Roosters
            stop playing the man yourself, stop whinging about every ****ing thing, and stop sending me pm's with your stupid gossip about Peter Doust and Brett Kenny and god knows what else

            what, do you think I'm put your "late mail" in the paper?

            lol
            You lost whatever ounce of credibility you had with that idiotic comment

            I'd love for Jim to plant one on your face. Fark it. So as not to have my mate risk another heart problem, I'm more than happy to do it for him

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post
              We don't go into that shop - the food's greasy and shit
              you are a prize ****wit, now you have stepped over the line.
              Jim actually does things for the club and if you had a brain (which you show time and time again you don't) you would understand so much posted here is done with a certain amount of tongue in cheek, that comment is not.

              The sole contribution you have to this place is to confirm my belief that anything involved with journalism has no credibility, morals or ticker.

              I would tell you to go and print that in your disgrace rag, but then you are not even good enough to be one of the lowest forms of life.
              The Internet is a place for posting silly things
              Try and be serious and you will look stupid
              sigpic

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Kingbilly View Post
                you are a prize ****wit, now you have stepped over the line.
                Jim actually does things for the club and if you had a brain (which you show time and time again you don't) you would understand so much posted here is done with a certain amount of tongue in cheek, that comment is not.

                The sole contribution you have to this place is to confirm my belief that anything involved with journalism has no credibility, morals or ticker.

                I would tell you to go and print that in your disgrace rag, but then you are not even good enough to be one of the lowest forms of life.
                If Jim's entitled to air his opinion regarding me and where I work, I'm entitled to reciprocate

                Comment


                • #38
                  TOK - Why do you do it?? I just dont get you mate. Frikken Hell.
                  As melon said you are disgrace. Nothing more.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I am quietly optimistic....as always....but hoping that we are scoring too well for a refereeing decision to make a difference!
                    We love you Jimmy.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Horry View Post
                      TOK - Why do you do it?? I just dont get you mate. Frikken Hell.
                      As melon said you are disgrace. Nothing more.

                      Why? Personality disorder. They can't differentiate between positive and negative attention, as long as they receive attention they feel feel fulfilled.

                      He can't help it.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        i can picture the coup de grace with a chicken schnitzel to the head from jimmy!...go jman.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          I know I'm in the minority, but I don't mind TOK at all. Yes he can sometimes sound off and berate people for their narrow minded view of all things rugby league, but overall his contributions are usually pretty close to the mark. Some of us do see the rugby league landscape through red white and blue lenses and that is to be expected I suppose.

                          I tend to think that a lot of our problems with officials are self perpetuating. We are perceived, wrongly or rightly as an ill-disciplined team. Refs tend to look more closely at us and as a result they find more things to penalise. Saints on the other hand are the 'god-boys' of the refereeing world and it seems that they can stretch the rules a bit more than other teams because the refs don't appear to be as eagle-eyed. We all then get frustrated and out comes the 'refs are going to cost us the game' line.

                          Now before people shout me down and say that this is hardly fair. I agree. But we're like the child you have whom you don't trust. We watch that child more closely until they earn our trust. That's what we have to do. We have to earn the trust of the referees again. Its not going to be easy but it can be done. I'm not sure what the numbers were like but from 2002-2004 I can't remember us being hammered too often by the referees. We need to be an extra step behind the refs in the play the ball. We need to get off the player that half a second earlier. We need to get our hands away from the ball a bit quicker. I know this may cost us some short term pain in games, but Saints are living proof of the long term benefits

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            I'm on no-one's side here, but TOK is entitled to his opinion on food, football or whatever the farrk he wants to talk about!
                            If he thinks the food is shit so what?
                            I don't understand everyone getting angry over a comment about Jmans food?
                            If you like it, continue to farrken eat it then!!

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Headless Chook View Post
                              I know I'm in the minority, but I don't mind TOK at all. Yes he can sometimes sound off and berate people for their narrow minded view of all things rugby league, but overall his contributions are usually pretty close to the mark. Some of us do see the rugby league landscape through red white and blue lenses and that is to be expected I suppose.

                              I tend to think that a lot of our problems with officials are self perpetuating. We are perceived, wrongly or rightly as an ill-disciplined team. Refs tend to look more closely at us and as a result they find more things to penalise. Saints on the other hand are the 'god-boys' of the refereeing world and it seems that they can stretch the rules a bit more than other teams because the refs don't appear to be as eagle-eyed. We all then get frustrated and out comes the 'refs are going to cost us the game' line.

                              Now before people shout me down and say that this is hardly fair. I agree. But we're like the child you have whom you don't trust. We watch that child more closely until they earn our trust. That's what we have to do. We have to earn the trust of the referees again. Its not going to be easy but it can be done. I'm not sure what the numbers were like but from 2002-2004 I can't remember us being hammered too often by the referees. We need to be an extra step behind the refs in the play the ball. We need to get off the player that half a second earlier. We need to get our hands away from the ball a bit quicker. I know this may cost us some short term pain in games, but Saints are living proof of the long term benefits
                              Isn't that the same thing as saying the refs are costing us?
                              If we lie on a player for a split second less than a Dragon we concede the penalty but they don't. They can get away with forward passes but we don't. That reminds me of the Bulldogs game last year where we were called for a couple of forward passes that puzzled even the commentators. The Dragons have a habit of being offside for the first 2 or 3 tackles and then get onside before the ref calls the penalty (watch it closely) but we get called.

                              It may not be corrupt but this is what is frustrating to most roosters supporters. Why weren't the tigers penalised when Myles/Masoe (I think) was pushed when getting up to play the ball but the tigers copped a penalty a few minutes later for a lesser infringement?

                              Why do we need to earn the trust of the refs? They should be neutral and show no bias for or against any team. Yet we seem to cop a lot less of the 50/50 calls.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Greedy666 View Post
                                I'm on no-one's side here, but TOK is entitled to his opinion on food, football or whatever the farrk he wants to talk about!
                                If he thinks the food is shit so what?
                                I don't understand everyone getting angry over a comment about Jmans food?
                                If you like it, continue to farrken eat it then!!
                                Yes, his criticism of Jim's food is the reason I had a go at him

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X