Originally posted by Spanner in the works
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If Carney was drinking .....
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Cockadoodledoo View Post2 wrongs don't make a right. Basing a code of conduct on the lowest common denominator ensures problems will never go away.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cockadoodledoo View PostI will say common sense says Carney and Watts should have been with the squad last night attending the game. I cannot believe management would not have Carney on an extremely tight leash right now.
I just want to say that I always thought the low level DUI was blown out.
Seriously the bloke didnt drive the night he was on the juice, he drove the next day obviously unaware he was over. It was an unfortunate error not a deliberate one.
Regardless, Nowhere has it been said Carney was on the piss. So benefit of the doubt.
Again, we cant mentally focus on a Very big game ahead because we have this bloody circus and unwated attention because of the lunatics we draw to the club.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spanner in the works View PostAnd the problems come from more than just Carney, who in this case has done very little wrong if anything. Why sack him based on assumptions and accusations that have come from Rothfield mentioning Carney in an article to suit his own agenda. Guilty until proven innocent huh?...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spanner in the works View PostAnd society isn't a place for thugs. Yet we still let people like Watts, Bird and Inglis out.
As I remember it...Inglis' friend was in his face screaming all sorts of stuff, and all he did was push her away.
Bird lied to the club, at the behest of the girl, as I remember it.
The girl who in court admitted to being drunk and high on a cocktail of drugs, screaming at him and throwing things, wasn't it?
The CCTV footage from the nightclub incident clearly showed that he was the victim, he hit no woman, and in fact it was the woman who hit him, then she lied to the cops?
Was she ever charged?
How these domestics go...both the combatants screaming abuse at each other, and not things the ladies in the church choir would be saying either.
But, when the alcohol-fuelled fights turn from verbal to physical is when the real trouble starts and the law is broken.
In that domestic one of our young players was involved in...was it the girl brandishing the knife and threatening self-harm?
After all the court appearances etc they're now back together and have had a child?
Staying off the booze would see these young men get into a whole lot less trouble with the law.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cockadoodledoo View PostHe is supposed to be on rehab from injury, alcohol does not aid the rehab process. Besides I said I would not sack him but can understand if the club went that way.
What does the NRL do for the Roosters, exactly?
What was that first penalty against the Roosters for last night?
Comment
-
Even if he wasn't drinking, his attitude is farked being out so soon after his court apperance AND the fact he's suppose to be home resting his groin.
As much as I agree with JT that we need him to win, I agree with Pump in that he must be sacked or we will simply relive this farking nightmare some tie down the track.
Chook.
Comment
Comment