Interesting to note that last week was the first game we've lost in over a year when we've had at least 50% of the ball (51%) also our best completion rate in a while (88%).
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Stats
Collapse
X
-
Correct me if I'm wrong bro'. All the outstanding performers in round 1, being Eels, Souffs, us n the Riff had completion rates in the 60s in round one.
It busts the long held theory of many on this forum that we will win every time we have at least 50% of the ball and complete at least at 80% too....Last edited by SoS; 03-19-2015, 11:04 PM.
-
Originally posted by SoS View PostCorrect me if I'm wrong bro'. All the outstanding performers in round 1, being Eels, Souffs, us n the Riff had completion rates in the 60s in round one.
It busts the long held theory of many on this forum that we will win every time we have at least 50% of the ball and complete at least at 80% too....
Comment
-
Originally posted by SoS View PostCorrect me if I'm wrong bro'. All the outstanding performers in round 1, being Eels, Souffs, us n the Riff had completion rates in the 60s in round one.
It busts the long held theory of many on this forum that we will win every time we have at least 50% of the ball and complete at least at 80% too....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bigchook View PostInteresting to note that last week was the first game we've lost in over a year when we've had at least 50% of the ball (51%) also our best completion rate in a while (88%).
This thread wont be popular, but I like it.
The reason being its so telling, just not what most want to be told.
The FlogPen .
You know it makes sense.
Comment
-
I suspect it's probably more of a long term statistical thing. In this case we got close but didn't win. However, over 1000 games I suspect we'd win a significantly higer percentage of games where we've had more possession.
That said, footy's not always a mathematical game. After the game I heard Robbo say 'no SKD didn't cost us the game... there's so many other plays where we lost out'. Possession shows that we were reasonably well disciplined and hung onto the ball. IMO this definitely gave us more opportunities and took a lot of the pressure off. However, winning comes down to individual moments. The Souths game was the Souths game... no other game will play out in the same way.
For example, against Penrith we could have 30% possession and be defending back to back repeat sets for 70 minutes without letting a try in. This kinda game can be won by Penrith getting exhausted/desperate and letting in a flurry of tries within the last 10.
The Souths game was a really close game. Unfortunately Maloney had a bad day with the (conversion) boot and Souths scored most of their tries in the middle of the field. They scored 1 extra try with roughly 50% of possession in a game that coulda gone either way. As a result, I don't think it's a classic game where we've lost despite having more possession. It was more of a 50:50 possession nail biter.Last edited by ism22; 03-20-2015, 06:30 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bigchook View PostWe were outplayed last week. No excuses. Attack looked slick at times but too many missed tackles. I still can't work out how to use jwh most effectively. Once we unlock him we will be a much better side.
Comment
Comment