If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Surely you were in a pub in Kogarah! That was such a dive he should've been issued with goggles and a snorkel (which may have been appropriate in the weather)! That a penalty was rewarded after being reviewed was an absolute disgrace! No contact to the head anywhere, and afterwards he just sprang up! Should've been a penalty to us!
Surely you were in a pub in Kogarah! That was such a dive he should've been issued with goggles and a snorkel (which may have been appropriate in the weather)! That a penalty was rewarded after being reviewed was an absolute disgrace! No contact to the head anywhere, and afterwards he just sprang up! Should've been a penalty to us!
That's what I thought. We should have gotten a penalty for diving and he should have been put in the bin for 10.
Don't know about the other shot but the one on Aitken was a tickle across the shoulder and chest that wouldn't have hurt my grandmother.
Sickening display by Aitken but the officials weren't brave enough to call out his lie.
Glenn Stewart at least admitted he dogged it...Aitken lost some caste on Saturday with this act...good player but gee he's got some bad advice or mentors.
That idiot Brad Walter is claiming the MRC backed the refs and said Napa did hit the lay down Sally Aitken in the head with his shoulder. It did not look like it to me live.
If you listen to the Press Conference, Robbo has an exchange of words with "Brad" (Brad Walter of the SMH). Walter believed that the contact was real, but Robbo suggested that he look at the video.
In today's paper, Walter presents evidence that Robbo was wrong - (1) Aitken said so and (2) the match review committee said so (though the tackle was only worthy of a penalty).
I don't know which of these two have less credibility, but neither can convince me. What exactly did the match review committee object to? Recklessly attacking a player's chest and shoulder?
... What exactly did the match review committee object to? Recklessly attacking a player's chest and shoulder?
LMAO. Love your work Spirit.
I read that article by that bitter little brad walter. Clearly little brad has a problem with Trent Robinson and with logic.
To little brad if you happen to troll through this forum, it seems you couldn't put the game first as Trent asked of you and your fellow journalists. Instead you resort to a petty, vacuous and glib retort knowing that Trent doesn't have right of reply.
IMHO it as a disgraceful act taking the dive. Of all days, there was no honour in this. Gents, I'm fed up with the game. I started reading the internet today at the match. I'm disgusted in what it has become.
I just listened to Robbo's press conference. It echoed what I just wrote re lying down. Please listen and watch
Fair enough but there was more than that lying down that cost us the match that we are responsible yet these players will be up there next week doing it all again so we can blame the referees again. Either stay down or stop the whining!
Comment