judiciary discussion Maloney/Moa/Napa/Jennings/SST

[Tommy Smith]

Well his article on penalties has led to us being given a fair go.

[Thirteen]

When will we find out the official charges?
What a shame this is.
We should all be talking about how well we played last night.

[JB_Cloey]

I reckon possibly only Moa will go down, which would be a great shame after how well he wore the 8 Jersey last night.

I just can't see the judiciary letting 5 charges walk out the door without a single suspension.

[Hawkeye]

You've got News.Com referring to it as a 'Karate Kick' ....that sort of headline can't be helpful.
Seen a thousand Bruce Lee movies, looks nothing like anything from one of those !

[Intercept]

Do any of the guys mentioned have carry-over points? And can anyone explain how carry-over points work with regard to 'similar' and 'non-similar' offences or does that only affect the grading of a charge?

[Roosterfarian]

Rothfield tweeted that he doesnt think Maloney should miss a game for that.

I almost fell off my chair when I read it.

[Hollus]

Rothfield has been praising us all year. All his comments on Twitter last night were positive and he regularly shut down tweets about Maloney, Napa and SKD.

I think a few on here need to get over this Rothfield conspiracy.

[roostersrule2]

Rothfield tweeted that he doesnt think Maloney should miss a game for that.

I almost fell off my chair when I read it.

Maloney's going to the Sharks remember.

[Tom Verlaine's Ghost]

It hasn't been Rugby League for a few year, Jack!

I'm worried. It's been the Year of the Innocuous Charge.

I call it Ruby League Lite, or RLL.

[Kingbilly]

Nappa;s incident wasn't even a penalty. I just saw it again on TV and it was pathetic. There was basically no pressure at all

[Tommy Smith]

Didn't stop the Vermin filth from staying down like a pussy. They're still diving merkins.

[kurtsherlock6]

Nappa;s incident wasn't even a penalty. I just saw it again on TV and it was pathetic. There was basically no pressure at all

He was only put on report so they could justify giving a penalty for it. I really though there was very little in it but i suppose we'll have to wait and see.

[kurtsherlock6]

there will be 5 incidents looked at on Monday concerning our players

Maloney - for sticking his leg out, best case scenario grade 1 trip and he plays with early guilty plea, worst case gets charged with kicking and misses the first final

Moa - I think he is in trouble for his shot in the opening minutes on Stewart, given his track record a careless grade 1 would result in a 1 week suspension

Napa - crusher tackle, shouldn't have anything to worry about because there wasn't a second action to put pressure on the neck, but his fete rests with the MRP now

Jennings - shouldn't have anything to worry about with his lifting tackle

SST - also some concerns over a lifting tackle, should be right but like Napa his fete is in the MRP hands now.


the verdict Moa misses next week and the rest should be right to play.

Mate only Napa and Maloney were placed on report.

And yes i know this is an open forum and it probably wont make a scrap of difference, but why highlight incidents that haven't even rated a mention anywhere else??

[Andrew Walker]

Mate only Napa and Maloney were placed on report.

And yes i know this is an open forum and it probably wont make a scrap of difference, but why highlight incidents that haven't even rated a mention anywhere else??

what i find even more disturbing is not only is he highlighting incidents that havent come up as yet. He has condemned one of our players to missing next week. We have just won 3 minor premierships in a row and he comes up with doom and gloom He certainly seems a miserable cnut

[Johnny.]

Mate only Napa and Maloney were placed on report.

And yes i know this is an open forum and it probably wont make a scrap of difference, but why highlight incidents that haven't even rated a mention anywhere else??

Felch has always been a troublemaker. It's one of the reasons I like him.