24/2/16 SMH REPORTING ON SKD COURT CASE

[ism22]

'Mr Temby questioned Ms Peris on the contents of a letter sent to then-CEO of the Roosters, Brian Canavan, in late June last year.'

Brian resigns, the plot thickens...

[Guest]

He has extensive investments and properties and this parasite wants a slice of the cake and it's not the woman in question. Everybody knows the truth and it's coming out thick and fast.

[Bigchook]

So you are saying that people only take others to court if they are guilty? Are you 10 years old? Seriously this is up there as one of the dumbest posts I have ever written here.

No that's actually not what I said at all. And if you can't construct an argument to support your opinion without resorting to insults then perhaps you're the juvenile in this thread. Try not to get so upset when someone posts an alternate opinion. This is an internet forum after all.

[Salvatori Grubber]

'Mr Temby questioned Ms Peris on the contents of a letter sent to then-CEO of the Roosters, Brian Canavan, in late June last year.'

Brian resigns, the plot thickens...

Hmm - it does.

[JAF]

This could get messy - real messy!

[Jacks Fur Coat]

I'd back Jessica to beat Nova in a race

Nova's been in a good paddock

True...I played touch against Nova at the world masters...a number of years ago now, and even then her athletic ability was a thing of the past.

[Cockadoodledoo]

No that's actually not what I said at all. And if you can't construct an argument to support your opinion without resorting to insults then perhaps you're the juvenile in this thread. Try not to get so upset when someone posts an alternate opinion. This is an internet forum after all.

That's the thing. If he isn't guilty why would perris take him to court? The fact that she uses cocaine should be enough for her to lose her own sponsorships and run into problems competing for Australia at the Olympics. She may be a moron but I doubt she is silly enough to risk her career and reputation on a lie which would inevitably be proven so.

I am sorry but I just can't sugarcoat your poorly thought out ideas. It isn't personal but you are unable to rationalize why she would take him to court if he wasn't guilty. The rest of your post is fiction. I am not aware that she has any sponsors (please enlighten me on these and how valuable they are?), she is no where near Olympic selection based on her sprint times so we can just strip that part from your argument too. So what career and reputation does she have?

As to suggesting the Roosters should have given in to her extortion attempt, I think you have been taken well and truly to town by others on this thread.

[fletch]

no surprise 9 buried their SKD court case coverage in the middle of their bulletin tonight, apparently hearing how SKD representatives rip apart Peris's story isn't headline worthy.

[Bigchook]

I am sorry but I just can't sugarcoat your poorly thought out ideas. It isn't personal but you are unable to rationalize why she would take him to court if he wasn't guilty. The rest of your post is fiction. I am not aware that she has any sponsors (please enlighten me on these and how valuable they are?), she is no where near Olympic selection based on her sprint times so we can just strip that part from your argument too. So what career and reputation does she have?

As to suggesting the Roosters should have given in to her extortion attempt, I think you have been taken well and truly to town by others on this thread.

I stated that I believed it to be unlikely for her to drag a fictitious case to the court as she herself is an athlete (perhaps aspiring) with a profile and belongs to a very high profile indigenous family. If she were to drag him to court on a lie, it would be exposed and she would stand to lose as much as skd if proven guilty. What can't you grasp about that?

I would never suggest the roosters give in to extortion attempt. Don't pretend to have inside knowledge. For all we know everything she has said is truth. As she mentioned the roosters and the nrl are partnered with a domestic violence organisation and IF she was a victim of domestic violence then the nrl and the roosters do have a duty of care to her as the perpetrator is an employee. It would be hypocritical to turn her away on her own if it's true.

But again, surely you're intelligent enough to be able to work these scenarios through your head. And that's what they are hypothetical scenarios. I'm just stating them as everything is not always as black and white as the forum may state. Too suggest that it's the dumbest post you've seen just proves that you can't grasp any idea other than the first that pops into your head.

[Bigchook]

no surprise 9 buried their SKD court case coverage in the middle of their bulletin tonight, apparently hearing how SKD representatives rip apart Peris's story isn't headline worthy.

It's criminal that they have a hard on for the nrl. I wonder if the media does this to afl players in Melbourne.

[Cockadoodledoo]

I stated that I believed it to be unlikely for her to drag a fictitious case to the court as she herself is an athlete (perhaps aspiring) with a profile and belongs to a very high profile indigenous family. If she were to drag him to court on a lie, it would be exposed and she would stand to lose as much as skd if proven guilty. What can't you grasp about that?

You see your problem is with separating the truth from reality. Once you do, it will set you free. She is not an athlete with a profile, she is merely an aspiring but not successful one with a famous name. Are you aware her mother used government funds to bring Ato Bolden to Australia in an attempt to have a sexual relationship with the man? The family is not afraid of risking reputation for reward as this shows. She is broke (as she has testified in court), the only job (career if you want) that I can find that she ever had was working for her mothers indigenous foundation many years ago. Sucking off the public teat seems to run in he family tree. Again what does she have to lose v what Shaun has to lose?

SKD supported her and her son financially whilst she lived with him. He even started a business which he worked in whilst they were together. He asked her if she would like to occasionally work there with him and she flat out refused to do so. It would be great if you were leading her prosecution team, the case would have been over 15 minutes after it started.

http://www.ntnews.com.au/news/northe...6add644aa4089b

[eddie]

I would never suggest the roosters give in to extortion attempt. .

Mate, sorry but's that's exactly what you suggested.

You also suggested this woman isn't stupid enough to take this matter to court if she's lying.

Just saying.

[Bigchook]

Mate, sorry but's that's exactly what you suggested.

You also suggested this woman isn't stupid enough to take this matter to court if she's lying.

Just saying.

It's not extortion if what she says is true is what I said. If what she says is true then I would expect the roosters and any other club to provide her with short term assistance as part of a duty of the NRLs duty of care to victims of domestic violence perpetrated by an nrl employee.

[Bigchook]

I just don't think you are really thinking this through. She walks in and says Shaun bashed me and was abusive in our relationship. The club asks Shaun and he denies the claims completely, why should the club be overly concerned with the welfare of a devious lying, manipulative human being who is happy to slander one of the clubs representatives? How would Shaun feel knowing the club is propping her up based on her lies? You think he might feel let down? What has been written so far is the tip of the iceberg. The club did the right thing by Shaun to say no.

Because she's a human being? And making very serious claims agaibst an employee. Do you honestly think the club shouldn't be concerned if a players partner said that? I guess it'd be different if it was Greg Inglis Mrs and happening to souths.

I have nothing more to say on this. I hope skd is innocent and proven so. If hes guilty, I hope he never wears our clubs colours again.

[Guest]

It's not extortion if what she says is true is what I said. If what she says is true then I would expect the roosters and any other club to provide her with short term assistance as part of a duty of the NRLs duty of care to victims of domestic violence perpetrated by an nrl employee.

Of course it was an attempt at extortion. Even is SKD is guilty and she is a victim she still went for compensation over justice. I think it tells you a lot about the woman. She didn't say I have been wronged and I will have this man put away so he can not hurt me or anyone else in the future. She saw the opportunity to make money. Honestly, her mother is a senator. How broke could the family really be. I'm guessing Mama Whore has a lot more cash tucked away than SKD. The letter was poorly written and full of grammatical errors but I don't think it is too difficult to read the underlying message as intended by the author of the letter.