Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The hit on Burgess

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by stephenj View Post
    at gaqmes end and severly concussed he still managed top go over witrh rest ofd the team ro rhe chookpen onyamate, respect earned aqnd deserved

    What the ???

    Seriously mate check your spelling ...

    Comment


    • #17
      Deliberate and premeditated hit to the head goes well beyond what I would describe as reckless or careless

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Spirit of 66 View Post
        1. Unlike the pathetic Knights cat who tried to milk a penalty from Napa's harmless tap on his shoulder, young Joe stood straight up even though he had been illegally whacked. Had it not been for the fact that the referee noticed him stumbling around in backplay, there would not have even been a penalty.

        2. Nobody gets sent off these days, I know, but the result of this incident was that the Roosters played with 16 men while the Knights played with 17. I think a free interchange is insufficient compensation.
        The shoulder charge was a dog act and Burgess got straight up (to his credit - showing a lot of character.)

        Yeah... we played moat of the game without a star winger. We won so it was okay but if we'd had another narrow loss then I'd be pissed.

        Knight were a bunch of dirty b@stards. I'm glad we kicked their @rse.

        Comment


        • #19
          Joe was brave yet the best outcome from this was SKD changing to the other wing whilst in the second half Fergo has found his place in the team on the wing at the expense of Toops

          Comment

          Working...
          X