I heard yesterday that the NRL would consider changing the penalty handed out to Parra. If so, they should definitely wipe Parra's favourable For and Against. Points they scored while illegally over the salary cap shouldn't push them over the line and into the semis at the end of the year.
Put it this way: if we have the same amount of competition points as Parra at the end of the year, but an inferior F & A, and don't make the semis while they do - is that fair?
I think the NRL should give Parra an enormous deficit in the F & A column. How does any team feel if they're knocked out of the top eight by Parra's superior F & A?
I don't really know if Parra's loss of 12 competition points is fair or not, but the NRL will have a disaster on their hands if its their superior F & A that sees them through.
This scenario is unlikely, but the one per-centers matter.
Put it this way: if we have the same amount of competition points as Parra at the end of the year, but an inferior F & A, and don't make the semis while they do - is that fair?
I think the NRL should give Parra an enormous deficit in the F & A column. How does any team feel if they're knocked out of the top eight by Parra's superior F & A?
I don't really know if Parra's loss of 12 competition points is fair or not, but the NRL will have a disaster on their hands if its their superior F & A that sees them through.
This scenario is unlikely, but the one per-centers matter.
Comment