Tweet
Is he staying or going ?
-
-
I hope to god he is staying. Nothing official yet though and June 1 is that much closer now. -
Um...pardon my ignorance, but who is Snapperhead?Comment
-
Myles. Check his forehead. Just like an old man snapper with that bump.Originally posted by Maggie View PostAlcohol never solved any life problems.....then again neither did milk.Comment
-
Has been one of the few putting in each week.
Must stay.Born and bred in the eastern suburbs.Comment
-
I just wonder if there is more it ?
He was all but signed 2 months agoComment
-
I believe he has put negotiations on hold ATM...Comment
-
Oh dear, that can't be good.Originally posted by Pass the Ball View Post
It would be bad bad bad to lose one of the few players that have actually had a go on top of losing the other one in Fitzy."The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."
Thomas JeffersonComment
-
There was talk a while back that NQL were after the peanut head.
It would be a massive blow if he left, but you couldn't blame him for leaving this rabble.Comment
-
I hope to God he re-signs!Comment
-
-
He MUST be re-signed. As to Shackelton!Comment
-
I hope he stays. He gives his all every game. We need Shack too.Comment
-
You can't blame Myles for putting off contact talks considering the state of confusion and rabble the Club is currently in.
Remember he was caught out last time. He signed on the basis Sticky was coach and by the time he arrived Opes was in charge.
As for Shack, if he's forced to go elsewhere to earn some decent dollars after we've wasted salary cap dollars on that hopeless idiot Kouparitsis for 2010, that'll do me as far as our recruitment and retention is concerned.
Both of these blokes have been amongst our best this season, and deserve new contracts.
NCSupporting the RW&B, through good times and bad times.Comment
-
NC I cant agree with much of that to be honestOriginally posted by novice chook View Post
Nate signed with up for about $250k per year in 2007 for three years which would have been double what he was getting paid at the dogs I don't think the coach had that much to do with it to be honest.
Shack should be made to wait for a contract upgrade - here is a guy that made his debut in 2005 and has played less games than Mini since then for the club, and lets be honest if we didn't give him a good faith contract last year when he was out all year he would be playing Jim Beam cup and flying well under the radar of any other club. He IMO shill has a lot to prove before he gets a new deal.
Koops I believe is being paid almost nothing by us as was still under contract with the dogs for 2009 and 2010, to me that was a good value deal.Comment
Comment