Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Former Newcastle Knights player James McManus has win in concussion court battle

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by rented tracksuit View Post

    HIA has only been around for a few years. He was playing for many years before that where players usually argued to stay out and quite often did.

    There is the good point!
    thank you tracksuit im not surprised that youre one of the few who understands this

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by boogie View Post

      thank you tracksuit im not surprised that youre one of the few who understands this
      if someone had followed rugby league for more than 5 mins, they would know this!

      It still happens today as well that players argue to stay on the field. The only difference now is that the clubs are accountable for not taking them off thus the players don't get their way anymore. It wasn't the case that long ago.
      FVCK CANCER

      Comment


      • #18
        SCAT3 is a BS test anyway...

        http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/bjsports/47/5/259.full.pdf

        You are basically asked how you feel then given a few coordination tests. IMO lots of players could jig the test if they wanted to go right out there.

        Comment


        • #19
          Do we really need this concussion garbage on the forum?

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by boogie View Post

            that doesnt change the fact that prior to the hia this was a common thing to happen
            It has been known since the mid 1980's of the dangers of being concussed before the symptoms of a prior concussion had occurred and for at least a decade on the long term impacts of concussions. Just because the NRL resisted taking action until the pressure of the media until recently, does not absolve them or the NRL clubs of any liability.
            For a relevant comparison, the NFL recently had to pay out a $1billion settlement to players who have suffered from the symptoms of post concussion syndrome.
            ...

            Comment


            • #21
              culture yeah

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Cockadoodledoo View Post

                It has been known since the mid 1980's of the dangers of being concussed before the symptoms of a prior concussion had occurred and for at least a decade on the long term impacts of concussions. Just because the NRL resisted taking action until the pressure of the media until recently, does not absolve them or the NRL clubs of any liability.
                For a relevant comparison, the NFL recently had to pay out a $1billion settlement to players who have suffered from the symptoms of post concussion syndrome.
                Yes, of course it would all be driven by some American crap.

                Comment


                • #23
                  I dont think its crap. just needs to b implemented better. gotta protect players

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View Post
                    Do we really need this concussion garbage on the forum?
                    Why is it garbage?
                    Originally posted by jism
                    I saw Reynolds crying in front of me after the game and yelled out 'WHAT ARE YOU CRYING ABOUT?!?!? GO SAY SORRY TO COOPER YOU GRUB!!!' He looked up at me with a pretty broken looking face.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View Post

                      Yes, of course it would all be driven by some American crap.
                      I don't get it, are you saying players don't get concussed? Don't suffer long term effects? Why is it "crap"?
                      Originally posted by jism
                      I saw Reynolds crying in front of me after the game and yelled out 'WHAT ARE YOU CRYING ABOUT?!?!? GO SAY SORRY TO COOPER YOU GRUB!!!' He looked up at me with a pretty broken looking face.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View Post
                        Do we really need this concussion garbage on the forum?
                        Dont know. Do we?
                        FVCK CANCER

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Cockadoodledoo View Post

                          It has been known since the mid 1980's of the dangers of being concussed before the symptoms of a prior concussion had occurred and for at least a decade on the long term impacts of concussions. Just because the NRL resisted taking action until the pressure of the media until recently, does not absolve them or the NRL clubs of any liability.
                          For a relevant comparison, the NFL recently had to pay out a $1billion settlement to players who have suffered from the symptoms of post concussion syndrome.
                          that doesnt change the fact that players would once upon a time refuse to come off the field or lie about their condition to medical staff

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by boogie View Post

                            that doesnt change the fact that players would once upon a time refuse to come off the field or lie about their condition to medical staff
                            I get that Boogie, but if those players were concussed at the time and said they are ok, a court may not accept that defence. If someone is concussed they don;t have much idea what is going on and therefore has the judgment and capacity at that time of an 'unfit person'. That will be the issue, I am old fashioned and hate to see all this litigation creep into the game but it has now.

                            It will be interesting to see what the outcome is and I think this is why the HIA rules came into effect recently as the NRL and clubs needed to somewhat protect themselves from litigation which arised from incidents from that point on. But for incidents before the HIA rules came into effect it was always going to be pandora's box once the NFL litigation commenced.

                            NB I have been concussed several times from footy and other sports and accidents. Re the sporting pursuits, I understood that I participated in a contact sport and worst case scenario was that I could be paralysed or even die and for that I was doing it as an amateur as I loved the game. So in some way I don't feel a lot of sympathy for these guys who were fortunate enough to get paid for playing a sport they love as I am sure they knew the risks too. However, I do think something has to be done, re players super etc prospects after a footballers career, their health and mental health, etc. I hope it (the head injuries)doesn't screw your brain. I really dunno but perhaps the issues I face from now is what people used to call old age and maybe it is because parts of the brain decline with age lol.
                            Last edited by Parkway_Drive; 08-27-2017, 12:44 PM.
                            Originally posted by boogie

                            "There's a lot of people competing for title of dumbest chookpen member such as Tommy S, Rusty, Johnny, ROC, Tobin but without a doubt you are the worst, youre thick as a brick christ this is the dumbest thing I've read in a long time you should go back to supporting the panthers"

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X