Broncos - Can we beat them?

[Johnny Tobin]

If you as you call,

Likely a Sharks Prelim

Prelim.JPG

I know. I am dredding that.

The Sharks fans would think at the moment they have a saloon passage to the GF.

Parra may beat them on a good day. And then it would be time for 1981/2 revenge - a dish served very cold indeed.

[Guest]

Yo I hopes we flog these flogs you know what I'm sayin. Old Bennet can go and retire yo.

[Guest]

all this talk if cummins is ref we wont win is pure bullcrap excuse making loser talk thats what people who dont succeed do they make excuses before the fact we can beat anyone regardless of who the ref is

[Guest]

all this talk if cummins is ref we wont win is pure bullcrap excuse making loser talk thats what people who dont succeed do they make excuses before the fact we can beat anyone regardless of who the ref is

Yo I agree with this. We good enough then it don't matter you know what I'm sayin

[Guest]

If you as you call,

Likely a Sharks Prelim

Prelim.JPG

Yo I agree but we can do those drug cheats you know what I'm sayin

[theGman]

A Qld journo said Boyd is definitely out on Fox Sports last night, which almost makes me more nervous. We almost seem to play only as well as we think we need to - and even without Boyd, the Broncs will put in a good showing.

But, yes, I think we'll win. Battle-hardened, our defence outstanding, our attack full of potential and boosted by the return of Toops, we're primed for a big month.

Nikorima to replace Boyd @ fullback.

If that's what they end up doing we need to bomb him all night with Fergo and Toups flying through. Let's see if Archer's men are consistent with their recent edict of penalising deliberate blokers.

[BallyChook]

all this talk if cummins is ref we wont win is pure bullcrap excuse making loser talk thats what people who dont succeed do they make excuses before the fact we can beat anyone regardless of who the ref is

I agree, we can beat anyone regardless of who the ref is. However, historically do our chances of winning improve or decline when Cummins is reffing?

[Jacks Fur Coat]

I agree, we can beat anyone regardless of who the ref is. However, historically do our chances of winning improve or decline when Cummins is reffing?

We have to be clearly the better team when Cummins referees ...its as simple as that.

[The Thracian]

If we are on our game for 70 of the 80 minutes and our game managers are involved for the majority of the game not for 10 minute spurts here and there, we will win by 20

[mightyrooster]

I agree, we can beat anyone regardless of who the ref is. However, historically do our chances of winning improve or decline when Cummins is reffing?

The stats don't lie.

[mattyh]

I have a bad feeling on this one dont know why

[Guest]

I agree, we can beat anyone regardless of who the ref is. However, historically do our chances of winning improve or decline when Cummins is reffing?

we won a grand final with cummins as the referee i dont care if darren lockyer referees this game we control our own fate turn and drop the ball and give away dumb penalties and make silly errors the referees become irrelevant but control the ball play to our strength then if we lose the better team won what can ya do but do it all next week

[The Thracian]

we won a grand final with cummins as the referee i dont care if darren lockyer referees this game we control our own fate turn and drop the ball and give away dumb penalties and make silly errors the referees become irrelevant but control the ball play to our strength then if we lose the better team won what can ya do but do it all next week

I Agree

[BallyChook]

we won a grand final with cummins as the referee i dont care if darren lockyer referees this game we control our own fate turn and drop the ball and give away dumb penalties and make silly errors the referees become irrelevant but control the ball play to our strength then if we lose the better team won what can ya do but do it all next week

I don't disagree with any of that (except the Lockyer bit). But you didn't answer the question.

[The Lip]

Nikorima to replace Boyd @ fullback.

If that's what they end up doing we need to bomb him all night with Fergo and Toups flying through. Let's see if Archer's men are consistent with their recent edict of penalising deliberate blokers.

Do you guys think Nikorima really plays fullback? Kahu is a quality fullback in my opinion. I think wily wayne might be throwing up a smoke screen here. Kahu to fullback, Mead to wing, Niko stays at 7 and Bungy stays on the bench seems more logical to me than having four halves on the field all game being Niko out of pos at fullback, Hunt out of pos at hooker, Bungy out of time at halfback and Milf at 6.

I hope he does what he says - that's too many little men on the field all game in my opinion.