Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hargreaves

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Keep him at lock. Any one notice we only had one light backrower for once. Anasta. We had Ryles, Myles, Guerra, Anasta, JWH. Good go forward for once.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by roostern9 View Post
      Keep him at lock. Any one notice we only had one light backrower for once. Anasta. We had Ryles, Myles, Guerra, Anasta, JWH. Good go forward for once.
      I agree. I think for our pack to be effective we can ony have one of Anasta, Maubs or Symonds in the backrow and one on the bench - otherwise packs dominate us too easily.
      Last edited by Fleabag Fletch; 08-01-2011, 03:04 PM.

      Comment


      • #18
        JWH has been enormous for most of the season.
        Born and bred in the eastern suburbs.

        Comment


        • #19
          The new age Lock is being played as another Prop to clog up the middle in defence and drive the ball forward hard and straight in attack, the only light weight in the pack should be the Hooker with this style of play.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Game Fowl View Post
            The new age Lock is being played as another Prop to clog up the middle in defence and drive the ball forward hard and straight in attack, the only light weight in the pack should be the Hooker with this style of play.
            Yeh you've pretty much just got your middle third players (13,8 and 10) and your two fringe players (11 and 12).

            A few teams like the Panthers though still play with that ball playing option (Lewis), I certainly think Anasta could perform a similar role but it'd require more work from our second rowers.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Madduke View Post
              Gladys, Rooster 6 is a dude. That picture is of some famous chick.
              Light speed Duke??

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post
                Yeh you've pretty much just got your middle third players (13,8 and 10) and your two fringe players (11 and 12).

                A few teams like the Panthers though still play with that ball playing option (Lewis), I certainly think Anasta could perform a similar role but it'd require more work from our second rowers.
                I think that is the problem , too many cooks trying to be ball players in close - Anasta, TC and JJ. all that happens is confusion.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by beguurk View Post
                  Light speed Duke??
                  Well, I don't want to brag.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    How good was his cover tackle on Hornby, just watched the replay. Forgot it because I was so nervous but his defence was immense threw himself at anything that moved. Another good game from the big man.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Went hard often and loves his work, we need to keep him.

                      Chook.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        manly are chasing hard for him.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          JWH is AWESOME and we must hang onto him at all costs. If only some of the more senior guys played with the same amount of passion and determination.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by bigben View Post
                            manly are chasing hard for him.
                            I don't understand this! Why would they want him back when they obviously didn't rate him and let him go?
                            Was it so he would get some experience and has now proved to be better than they thought?
                            We need him.......if on ly because he is the best looking player we've had in years.
                            Hope Maubs will be back too.......underrated and reliable player.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Maggie View Post
                              I don't understand this! Why would they want him back when they obviously didn't rate him and let him go?
                              Was it so he would get some experience and has now proved to be better than they thought?
                              We need him.......if on ly because he is the best looking player we've had in years.
                              Hope Maubs will be back too.......underrated and reliable player.
                              They only let him go because they couldn't afford to offer him what we did. We paid massive overs for him at the time.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Perhaps he is just doing his apprenticeship at Easts..??

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X