Cooper Cronk to the Roosters in 2018 ?

[ROC181]

Sorry R6 let me fix that up..
We won't win another comp with Pearce at 7,just my opinion..

We could win another comp with Pearce but only if we have a major star that can take control of the game like we had in SBW. Then all that Pearce has to do is feed the scrum and tackle. Leave the kicking and organising to someone else.

[Rooster_6]

We could win another comp with Pearce but only if we have a major star that can take control of the game like we had in SBW. Then all that Pearce has to do is feed the scrum and tackle. Leave the kicking and organising to someone else.

SBW did the organising?

C'mon ROC,

[Johnny Tobin]

I heard this Cronk rumour a couple of months ago. It just didn't make sense. Still doesn't.

[Guest]

Heard its real and in the works. no guarantees yet though

[rented tracksuit]

SBW did the organising?

C'mon ROC,

I was wondering the same thing.

[Lydon]

I heard this Cronk rumour a couple of months ago. It just didn't make sense. Still doesn't.

I doubt it happens,Cronk has no reason to do it..
His legacy is set after tonight,why risk it changing Clubs after being with the Storm his entire career ?!?

[rented tracksuit]

unlikely as a player, but a specialist coach isn't out of the question

if he's going to have any association with us, that more than likely would be his role imo.

Personally, I would love me to see him go around again with anither club. Us or someone else, I don't care. I would just like to see how he goes away from his beloved Storm.

[Johnny.]

Uncle Nick is about results. Nine years as a half for one win is not good enough.

[ROC181]

SBW did the organising?

C'mon ROC,

Did I say 'organise'? I said control because when he took charge the team followed. He led from the front and inspired the rest, as Napa said a few weeks ago. He wasn't out there gesticulating with his hands.

Cronk organises and does it well. Ok it may never happen but we deserve the best.

[Rooster_6]

Did I say 'organise'? I said control because when he took charge the team followed. He led from the front and inspired the rest, as Napa said a few weeks ago. He wasn't out there gesticulating with his hands.

Cronk organises and does it well. Ok it may never happen but we deserve the best.

Yeh you did say organising..

Someone like SBW to control the game.... so Pearce can leave the organising to someone else..

[Guest]

SBW did the organising?

C'mon ROC,

He didn't say SBW did the organising, he took control of the game and played a vital role in winning it for us. Something Pearce fails to do time after time.

SKD try in the 60th: deft pass from Moa, great line run and offload from SBW, run and pass from Maloney, catch and pass from mini. Great organisation from Pearce? Wasn't sighted.

Jennings try in the 72nd: SBW line break up the middle, clutch last play option from Maloney, miraculous put down from Jennings. Great organisation from Pearce? He was at dummy half on the last play because the play prior he passed to our hooker to take a hit up for tackle 5...

Now I can almost hear your rebuttal, over exaggerating his hand in Guerra's try in the 55th but let's be honest, it was another standard Pearce pre-meditated play, that did come off mind you, that came about from a shot defensive line on the previous play.

Ive been a staunch defender of Pearce across the last 9 years but he is just not all that good.

[rented tracksuit]

He didn't say SBW did the organising, he took control of the game and played a vital role in winning it for us. Something Pearce fails to do time after time.

SKD try in the 60th: deft pass from Moa, great line run and offload from SBW, run and pass from Maloney, catch and pass from mini. Great organisation from Pearce? Wasn't sighted.

Jennings try in the 72nd: SBW line break up the middle, clutch last play option from Maloney, miraculous put down from Jennings. Great organisation from Pearce? He was at dummy half on the last play because the play prior he passed to our hooker to take a hit up for tackle 5...

Now I can almost hear your rebuttal, over exaggerating his hand in Guerra's try in the 55th but let's be honest, it was another standard Pearce pre-meditated play, that did come off mind you, that came about from a shot defensive line on the previous play.

Ive been a staunch defender of Pearce across the last 9 years but he is just not all that good.

And that's the frustrating thing. He can be that good. We just don't see it enough.

[Rooster_6]

He didn't say SBW did the organising, he took control of the game and played a vital role in winning it for us. Something Pearce fails to do time after time.

SKD try in the 60th: deft pass from Moa, great line run and offload from SBW, run and pass from Maloney, catch and pass from mini. Great organisation from Pearce? Wasn't sighted.

Jennings try in the 72nd: SBW line break up the middle, clutch last play option from Maloney, miraculous put down from Jennings. Great organisation from Pearce? He was at dummy half on the last play because the play prior he passed to our hooker to take a hit up for tackle 5...

Now I can almost hear your rebuttal, over exaggerating his hand in Guerra's try in the 55th but let's be honest, it was another standard Pearce pre-meditated play, that did come off mind you, that came about from a shot defensive line on the previous play.

Ive been a staunch defender of Pearce across the last 9 years but he is just not all that good.

Creating points isn't the same as organisation.

Just stop.

[milanja]

Uncle Nick is about results. Nine years as a half for one win is not good enough.

Nick must be happy with the results, if he is happy with only 2 premierships in his 40 odd years of association.

[ROC181]

Yeh you did say organising..

Someone like SBW to control the game.... so Pearce can leave the organising to someone else..

Yes i did say 'organising' but as keggs beat me to it, I meant leave the organising to someone else. SBW took charge when things weren't happening. I hope that explains things?