Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wow ive noticed there are a large amount of ......

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by The Thracian View Post

    Loyal servant? The club could have sacked him many times over his his off field crap, Robbo and Nick saved him, the club has been more than loyal and he is a very rich young man because of it.

    he has dragged this clubs name through the mud many times and be punished for it.

    as much as I do not rate him, I want him to stay and move to 9, Jake into back row

    if he wants to buy into what the club has planned, awesome if he wants to spit the dummy and go elsewhere, so be it, he will not be sacked he will leave on his own terms


    cut him some slack with the dog incident, it takes two to tango or do the fox trot

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by OG ROOSTER View Post
      The whole forum figured that weirdo
      Why did you PM me and ask me out for a drink then OG?

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by The Lip View Post

        Why did you PM me and ask me out for a drink then OG?
        OG is banned Lippy.

        FVCK CANCER

        Comment


        • #49
          Thanks RT.
          Last edited by The Lip; 10-27-2017, 07:18 AM.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by rented tracksuit View Post
            OG is banned Lippy.
            So no more gangsta ghetto speak?

            Comment


            • #51
              I honestly don't get all the drama over Pearce he's a good first grader, nothing special and the club has an opportunity to sign an elite player or supposed to be so for the next two years. The Club would be negligent not to chase Cronk and plenty on here would say so.

              If other posters opinions on Lam and O'Sullivan are correct in that they will be the future of the club then this Cronk signing will be for all the better as he will only be here for two years, I can't see Pearce moving over in two years time for generation next.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by ROC181 View Post

                So no more gangsta ghetto speak?
                Ain’t it grand! I wonder how long our relief is for?
                FVCK CANCER

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by rented tracksuit View Post

                  a genuine possibility unfortunately. Extremely sad if it eventually happens.
                  What makes you think that?
                  I believe if the Roosters want him then he will be going nowhere.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Mickie Lane View Post

                    What makes you think that?
                    I believe if the Roosters want him then he will be going nowhere.
                    He’s after a contract upgrade which will be difficult to afford if we have to buy Cronk. He also wants it sooner rather than later. There are plenty of clubs screaming for a young up coming superstar that would pay him what he wants on the back of his potential alone.
                    FVCK CANCER

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by rented tracksuit View Post
                      He’s after a contract upgrade which will be difficult to afford if we have to buy Cronk. He also wants it sooner rather than later. There are plenty of clubs screaming for a young up coming superstar that would pay him what he wants on the back of his potential alone.
                      I dont get this contract upgrade term when a player is already under contract.
                      If he signed a contract for x amount over x amount of years then he cant get updated until that contract is finished.
                      But why do you think that Latrell would leave the Chooks? Where are you getting info from to suggest that?
                      If the Chooks want Latrell then he wont be going anywhere.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Mickie Lane View Post

                        I dont get this contract upgrade term when a player is already under contract.
                        If he signed a contract for x amount over x amount of years then he cant get updated until that contract is finished.
                        But why do you think that Latrell would leave the Chooks? Where are you getting info from to suggest that?
                        If the Chooks want Latrell then he wont be going anywhere.
                        I hope he won't be going anywhere. I get my info from sources I would rather keep to myself out of respect for them. Besides, it's hardly a big secret anyway. Everyone on here has been talking about it for a while now. I do agree with you however about contracts but sadly they don't mean much in the business that is rugby league these days.
                        FVCK CANCER

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Suppose Cronk doesn’t sign with us....

                          what new new tricks do you expect to see from Pearse in 2018?
                          Written and published on behalf of the Liberal Party, Queensland

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by The Lip View Post
                            F#%*wits on this site.
                            Says the person who spent their first dozen or so posts on this site claiming to be a woman.
                            ...

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Cockadoodledoo View Post

                              Says the person who spent their first dozen or so posts on this site claiming to be a woman.
                              Says the person who refutes others opinions by questioning their intellect.
                              FVCK CANCER

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Cockadoodledoo View Post

                                Says the person who spent their first dozen or so posts on this site claiming to be a woman.
                                Hey Cock if you check you will find I was very upfront about the fact that the one on the left wasn't really me right from the start when I put that up I did explain it wasn't. But even after that I kept getting continual questions is that really me - somehow I think a lot of posters just wanted it to be so? So that's when I wrote that post saying okay yes it is me and I'm lonely! - purely in humour - I thought it was hilarious myself! Anyway I hope that clears that up for you? Go back through my post history you will see. I think that post you refer to was probably my 50th post as well.
                                Last edited by The Lip; 10-28-2017, 07:44 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X