Radley >>> Friend

[stringaz]

You are so right. He is a fat little bastard that thinks he has a kicking game.

Worse than Farrah, Im worried he's on the decline with no resurgence coming hopefully he turns it around quick smart

[Guest]

Worse than Farrah, Im worried he's on the decline with no resurgence coming hopefully he turns it around quick smart

He has benn trying that blindside bullshit unsuccessfully since 2010. His peaks have been few and far between.

[The Skeez]

Been going over this thought for about 30 mins now, coulda been masterstroke but don't blame Pearcy for wanting to stay at 7

I know. He proved it last night. Good on him.

But when Trent told him he'd be playing in the halves, when what he meant was dummy half.. yeah, lead balloon stuff

[Thirteen]

Why criticise Friend now? He’s always been crap in attack. You could hardly expect just another off-season to change this.

[stringaz]

Why criticise Friend now? He’s always been crap in attack. You could hardly expect just another off-season to change this.

I was into him last year as well

[Flipper Hands]

I heard the Queen Mary was looking for a new anchor. They asked if Jake Friend was available.

He is our anchor, in defence.

[chopstiks]

My grandma would be better than Friend.

If anyone is watching Souths Warriors - Isaac Luke and Damien Cook - there's the difference.

I secretly hope Cronk hooked Friend and demanded Radley to get on.

[Cockadoodledoo]

He is our anchor, in defence.

And attack.

[eddie]

Worse than Farrah, Im worried he's on the decline with no resurgence coming hopefully he turns it around quick smart

Farrah ended up thinking he was more important than the club he played for.
Friend has been starting on that path for a couple of years now. Ever since he decided he'd teach young halfs a lesson on field at the cost of the team as a whole.

We should've sent him off with his mate as a package deal to newcastle, and picked up Griffin.

[Flipper Hands]

And attack.

I don't disagree with you. Trading him for someone else might result in unintended consequences in defence.

Sometimes you have to take the good with the bad.

[Bansai Pipeline]

I’d love to sign Isaac Luke.

Friend has been letting us down for at least 3 seasons.

[Cockadoodledoo]

I don't disagree with you. Trading him for someone else might result in unintended consequences in defence.

Sometimes you have to take the good with the bad.

No need to trade. Radley is a better dummy half already. Remember when Friend was out last year? We didn’t miss him at all. Radley was terrific. Why do we need the bad? Am I missing something?

[Thirteen]

I’d love to sign Isaac Luke.

Friend has been letting us down for at least 3 seasons.

Luke hasn’t played a decent game for 3 seasons.

[Flipper Hands]

No need to trade. Radley is a better dummy half already. Remember when Friend was out last year? We didn’t miss him at all. Radley was terrific. Why do we need the bad? Am I missing something?

Friend is better defensively than Radley IMO.

I was listening to the game, I'm in Nepal at the moment. So apologies if I get this totally wrong.

Did the match winner get scored with Friend off the field? I'm not saying it was Radleys fault, just asking.

I remember last year that Radleyshad a few defensive deficiencies. He was undoubtedly better in attack

[Gary Worthless]

I reckon Jake threw at least 5 forward passes in this game (including his very first pass) and it is a minor miracle that Badger only penalised this once.