Originally posted by milanja
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hedger's Heroes and Zeros - Rd 7 vs Bulldogs
Collapse
X
-
Watching the game live from the away fans corner,Aubo was outstanding!He shut down the Bulldogs only try outlet ,the Morris twins,if Reece Robinson & Fergo were together on that side we loose.Aubo desereves an 8 IMO.
The world is full of Kings & Queens,who blind your eye's & steal your dreams!
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Bill Williams View PostMatto 4? Zero of the week?
Anddddddddd all credibility lost lol. Stay tuned for DBW's takeover of Heroes and Zeros of the week + summaries starting next game
Matterson had 2 errors and gave away a couple of lazy penalties too, not to mention his inability to score the most simplest of tries when put through the biggest gap. He misses too many tackles and allows more offloads than anyone else. Sure he made 65 tackles but not one of them was a dominant hit, they were all just hanging on while he let the dogs run an extra 15 metres after contact. He only ran for 58 metres too and seems to fall to the ground at the first sight of contact.
I don't understand why everyone thought he played so well. It seemed like no one said he had a good game before someone mentioned the tackle count. Statistics don't show the full picture
Comment
-
Originally posted by BenCumminsIsACheat View Post
I gotta agree with Hedger's Matto rating. Weren't you the one who started a thread about just because Friend makes lots of tackles doesn't mean he's good?
Matterson had 2 errors and gave away a couple of lazy penalties too, not to mention his inability to score the most simplest of tries when put through the biggest gap. He misses too many tackles and allows more offloads than anyone else. Sure he made 65 tackles but not one of them was a dominant hit, they were all just hanging on while he let the dogs run an extra 15 metres after contact. He only ran for 58 metres too and seems to fall to the ground at the first sight of contact.
I don't understand why everyone thought he played so well. It seemed like no one said he had a good game before someone mentioned the tackle count. Statistics don't show the full picture
Although Matto wasnt the best on the field, he wasnt the "Zero of the week"
Comment
-
Originally posted by BenCumminsIsACheat View Post
I gotta agree with Hedger's Matto rating. Weren't you the one who started a thread about just because Friend makes lots of tackles doesn't mean he's good?
Matterson had 2 errors and gave away a couple of lazy penalties too, not to mention his inability to score the most simplest of tries when put through the biggest gap. He misses too many tackles and allows more offloads than anyone else. Sure he made 65 tackles but not one of them was a dominant hit, they were all just hanging on while he let the dogs run an extra 15 metres after contact. He only ran for 58 metres too and seems to fall to the ground at the first sight of contact.
I don't understand why everyone thought he played so well. It seemed like no one said he had a good game before someone mentioned the tackle count. Statistics don't show the full picture
Sorry if im offending carnts by lumping your joyless arse with them.
But You are a joyless carnt none the less.
What pleases you?
The FlogPen .
You know it makes sense.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Let me explain...Our completion rate was 67% (Dogs 77%). We made 17 errors (Dogs 11). We made 100 more tackles than Dogs. Dogs ran 460 meters more than us. Dogs had 200 meters more than us after contact. Dogs possession was 55%, ours 45%. With those stats, whoever plays 80 mins will make a lot of tackles. And the first mistake of the game was in the first set when Matterson went for a ridiculous offload in our own half. But I wasn’t picking on him. Most ratings were on the low side this week reflecting this wasn’t one of our best performances—- look at Keary and Cronk ratings. We need to do better, but at the same time we’ll gladly take the 2.
- 1 like
Comment
Comment