Credit to Andrew Jones.

[Bmw06i]

On 3 occasions durning the CH9 commentary he questioned why Roosters were penalised for being inside the 10 meters, according to Andrew the Roosters we’re back the 10 meters therefore it shouldn’t of been a penalty.

He even drew a line on once accession to prove they weren’t offside.

[Redwhiteblue4life]

Probably starting to fear for his job

[stringaz]

Yea I've never rated Andrew Johns, that Andrew Jones fella tho, he's spot on

[eddie]

I'm told the game managers are being strict this year and are actually enforcing the rules

Is voluntary tackle still in the rulebook?
(genuine question that one)
And some thing else............. and I don't think Radley should have been penalised for the high tackle on Taupow , it was a good hit on a bigger player.

[eddie]

Andrew Jones would agree , even if his dad Alan didn't. I think

[One Eyed Willy]

I'm told the game managers are being strict this year and are actually enforcing the rules

Is voluntary tackle still in the rulebook?
(genuine question that one)
And some thing else............. and I don't think Radley should have been penalised for the high tackle on Taupow , it was a good hit on a bigger player.

I think it’s still in the book just not enforced as they call it a “surrender” tackle, like when you run an old fashion Shepard but stop and get tackled

Radley hit him in the head with his shoulder, penalty, but he’ll it was good to watch, he had Marty rattled for sure

[David Bill Williams]

Perenara loves blowing...... on his whistle.

What about the offside penalty when Jared was standing right next to him. Was probably a toenail offside but was still called

What a dog lol

[Vasco]

I thought the Fox commentator, Brenton Speed, was bias towards Manly. Seemed to go on and on about how Manly should have received penalties etc.

[Parkway_Drive]

Yea I've never rated Andrew Johns, that Andrew Jones fella tho, he's spot on

Is he related to Stacey?

[stringaz]

Is he related to Stacey?

Nah Jim actually

[ism22]

On 3 occasions durning the CH9 commentary he questioned why Roosters were penalised for being inside the 10 meters, according to Andrew the Roosters we’re back the 10 meters therefore it shouldn’t of been a penalty.

He even drew a line on once accession to prove they weren’t offside.

Yeah for JWH? That was a joke! Led to them getting 2 free points + momentum at a crucial stage too?

[ism22]

887C6B32-4BF1-438F-A68B-764106401FFA.png

In other news, Joey steals Finchys beer.

[Thirteen]

We all know Joey is an expert at lines.

[eddie]

I think it’s still in the book just not enforced as they call it a “surrender” tackle, like when you run an old fashion Shepard but stop and get tackled

Thanks.
The incident that promped my question was when a manly player threw himself on the ground so as not to risk a shepard...............should've been a penalty to the defensive team for a voluntary tackle.
Rules are only enforced on whims or agendas these days.