Anasta

[Guest]

Is underrated on this forum. That is all.

[007]

In your opinion! Back it up. IMO he's a sook. He is over rated - he's played OK against mediocre opposition but a little bit late don't you think?

[Guest]

In your opinion! Back it up. IMO he's a sook. He is over rated - he's played OK against mediocre opposition but a little bit late don't you think?

Your the DETECTIVE! tell us the stats????????

[Headless Chook]

Parra would have killed to have him in their team tonight. He would have killed that game off in the last 10 minutes. As soon as we got back to 12-6 I knew we would win. The confidence from last week, plus the self belief at the moment is getting back to the levels they had this time last year.....we will give Melbourne a shake next week.

[Guest]

In your opinion! Back it up. IMO he's a sook. He is over rated - he's played OK against mediocre opposition but a little bit late don't you think?

No he's no longer overrated. He used to be, when people expected him to be a champion in his younger years, but hes aging nicely as a custodian 5/8 who has a good grasp of the game and fundamentally sound in kicking, passing, defence etc.

I'll never understand why people are so quick to bag him, he may not be as talented as Carney but at worst he's a very good first grade half.

[Guest]

The only times we look dangerous are when we're desperate.

Otherwise, there is no ruthless class to our attack. Both Pearce and Anasta looked nothing short of lost in Parra's red zone tonight for the majority of the game.

[Guest]

The only times we look dangerous are when we're desperate.

Otherwise, there is no ruthless class to our attack. Both Pearce and Anasta looked nothing short of lost in Parra's red zone tonight for the majority of the game.

Our execution all round was poor most of tonight. The enthusiasm of our pack got us over the line. That said, Anasta played well. Agree we still need a lot better structure in attack but at least we have bodies in motion when attacking the line now. Taka and Guerra are providing targets for Anasta and Pearce to hit.

An off season will do the team good to get some more polish and structure in attack.

[Guest]

By what standard did Braith play well?

By his own standards? Perhaps.

By the standard of a quality five eighth in an NRL first grade team? Not on your life.

[Funky Chicken]

I can't quite fathom how Channel 9 gave Anasta MOM, there were heaps better than him tonight.

Why did Brian Smith change a winning team and why did he play BJ on the wing all season, I am starting to think that Fred68 might have been correct in his assessment of Smith. Since BJ has been playing in the centres he has looked way more dangerous.

[Guest]

By what standard did Braith play well?

By his own standards? Perhaps.

By the standard of a quality five eighth in an NRL first grade team? Not on your life.

I'm not an Anasta fan, but I think your a bit harsh....

I thought he looked dangerous in attack. Ran to the line and throw some nice passes. Like I said, the polish wasn't there, but that could be said for the whole team.

[player 1]

Fair dinkum, bunch of negative whiners some of you.

Takes a captain to LEAD a team to pull off a comeback win like that, AND pot the winning shot.

So many keyboard perfectionists, why don't you pull your heads in once in a while.

Bloody well done Braith.

[Billy Gunn]

I have man love for Anasta - that is all

[Chook Norris]

He had a hand in some very important plays towards the latter part of the match. Well done to him, been playing well lately.

[Guest]

His not a drunk, does not shit in corridors and shows pride in the jumper.

[player 1]

His not a drunk, does not shit in corridors and shows pride in the jumper.

Thankyou. Believe it or not some of you, that means something. The pounding he has taken from some on this forum just makes me wonder if some of it is motivated by jealousy for his success outside the game, his looks, and the quality of the puss he attracts.