Originally posted by Dummy half
View Post
IMO the crux is that the NRL doesn't want a rich Sydney club (equivalent of say Chelsea or Madrid or whatever) winning the comp every year. It pisses off the weston's and isolates people from Brisbane/Melbourne.
Clearly no direct cheating goes on. However, there must be an element of nuance behind how games are reffed. Like it or not:
- The Raiders got most of their points from penalties awarded right in front (including the final nail in the coffin)
- Brisbane got most of their points from penalties and we had to spend 60 minutes (at key moments) playing with 12 men on the field (while 2 separate Origin stars sat out). Napa was then handed an extremely high grading for an accidental head clash (consistent with the NRL boss' personal opinion from last time). Word was... don't challenge or you could miss the GF (so damned if you do and damned if you don't).
In both games, teams were about to shut us out of the contest by:
- Taking forever to do everything.
- Doing grabbers into touch on the last tackle.
- Not going back 10, so that we are cramped/rushes in attack.
The deeper issue is that this is acceptable and we need a plan of attack to prevent it, or we will be bundled out of the finals quick smart. Do we have a plan? I hope we do becaue refs aside, we are looking shiiiiiiiit...
Comment