Mitchell Grade 1

[2013PREMIERS]

SST will need to play big minutes. We need his goal kicking. Fergo makes me too nervous.

I rate Fergo as a goal kicker. I remember back against the titans he nailed 2 from the sideline when Latrell was in the bin and did it again over the origin period against the tigers. And he will have 10 or so days to practice.

[QWERTY]

If latrell is suspended its probably our season done and dusted.With napa also out i dont think we can win it.There is a chance though ,all of us should be hoping that Souths and the dragons belt the living daylights out of each-other and are not at full strength when they play us.We will be fresh thats our only chance imo.

A bit of a Negative Nigel (though, im usually on the pessimistic side of things too)

[mattyh]

without latrell i dont like our chances

[Bansai Pipeline]

Latrell is 100% gone. No way he’s getting let off.

We have 2 weeks to train up a replacement.

Shouldn’t be impossible.

[Bansai Pipeline]

Latrell is 100% gone. No way he’s getting let off.

We have 2 weeks to train up a replacement.

Shouldn’t be impossible.

[Bansai Pipeline]

Latrell is 100% gone. No way he’s getting let off.

We have 2 weeks to train up a replacement.

Shouldn’t be impossible.

[One Eyed Willy]

When you watch the chambers tackle v lattrell the only difference is chambers uses more force to drive down. Unfortunatley I think we will be without him for a week. Can’t see him getting off the charge. He does drive down and no matter how you spin it, the onus is all on the defender to complete a safe tackle

[Johnny Tobin]

What about the sharks supporters that were throwing stuff at latrell? a 5 year ban would be appropriate imo.But the nrl doesn't seem to be doing much to identify them.

They are getting the video from the SFS to do so.

[Thirteen]

I rate Fergo as a goal kicker. I remember back against the titans he nailed 2 from the sideline when Latrell was in the bin and did it again over the origin period against the tigers. And he will have 10 or so days to practice.

Obviously has ability it’s his mental ability that worries me.

[Lydon]

I find it grossly unfair for a newspaper outlet coming out with a story on the morning of an appeal hearing which could influence the outcome of the case.

I actually don’t mind Andrew Webster as a journo but the morning of an appeal can be extremely influential..

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/lat...10-p502x8.html

[zac]

I find it grossly unfair for a newspaper outlet coming out with a story on the morning of an appeal hearing which could influence the outcome of the case.

I actually don’t mind Andrew Webster as a journo but the morning of an appeal can be extremely influential..

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/lat...10-p502x8.html

Thanks for posting.

Not sure what weight Webster has with a judiciary panel of ex-players ...

He's gone a bit overboard - saying that Robbo is being bizarre to suggest that Dugan was feigning injury is, itself, bizarre. Given Dugan's history of milking penalties he has no credibility. You can't cry wolf all the time and have people believe you.

Jumping up and down isn't itself evidence of a crusher tackle - you still have to apply significant pressure in the wrong spot.

[player 1]

I find it grossly unfair for a newspaper outlet coming out with a story on the morning of an appeal hearing which could influence the outcome of the case.

I actually don’t mind Andrew Webster as a journo but the morning of an appeal can be extremely influential..

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/lat...10-p502x8.html

What a toxic little boil of a man Webster is.

People are really worried we are gonna win this thing!

[RoosterChick]

I find it grossly unfair for a newspaper outlet coming out with a story on the morning of an appeal hearing which could influence the outcome of the case.

I actually don’t mind Andrew Webster as a journo but the morning of an appeal can be extremely influential..

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/lat...10-p502x8.html

We can only hope the 3 man judiciary panel don’t read the Herald today. Obviously, there are a lot of Journalists who sensationalise a story and some that have an agenda. Don’t know who is on the panel. Just hope they have an open mind and can be objective. Let’s hope they take the time to look at it from every angle.
Suprised that Buzz actually defended Latrell stating he didn’t think the tackle was anywhere near as bad as Chambers tackle.

[Lydon]

We can only hope the 3 man judiciary panel don’t read the Herald today. Obviously, there are a lot of Journalists who sensationalise a story and some that have an agenda. Don’t know who is on the panel. Just hope they have an open mind and can be objective. Let’s hope they take the time to look at it from every angle.
Suprised that Buzz actually defended Latrell stating he didn’t think the tackle was anywhere near as bad as Chambers tackle.

I agree regarding Buzz,though Paul Kent was adamant Latrell shouldn’t get off and pretty much won’t get off!

Bunch of fools!

[Jacks Fur Coat]

I agree regarding Buzz,though Paul Kent was adamant Latrell shouldn’t get off and pretty much won’t get off!

Bunch of fools!

Buzz is my new favourite journo...not kidding. He calls the bullshit of other press wannabes and has been SUPER nice/fair to us for a few seasons now.

He's my mate.