Trouble in the Chook pen - Rothfield

[Guest]

You told me to read the Ryles thread, so practice what's you preach you 'clueless dumbass'...
It was an optional 1 year extension....an option we/Easts decided not to take on.

How's that pride genius?

[Guest]

If a fallout between Smith and the Captain meant Braith leaving, so be it.

Amongst all these rumors of a clean out, SBW or no SBW, young superstars or not, the pink elephant in the corner is the presence of Anasta and Minichiello, two players well beyond their bests, both loyal servants but two who must go.

I'll cop Rothfield being right if we can finally move on.

[Rocky Rhodes]

You told me to read the Ryles thread, so practice what's you preach you 'clueless dumbass'...
It was an optional 1 year extension....an option we/Easts decided not to take on.

How's that pride genius?

huh, wtf are you carrying on about dribbler? The club made a decision to keep Ryles for another year (whether re-signing him or taking up an option on him is irrelevant) so something must have happened for the club to change that decision. Obviously a falling out with smith hence the original story was on the money. Surely you get it now einstein!

Dumbass!

[Guest]

Keep making a fool of yourself...it amuses me.

[Kingbilly]

Yeah right. The club so much wanted Ryles out by re-signing him to a new one year deal. If the club didn't want him then why re-sign him?

you are so funny my little friend.The club did not sign him at all. There were negotiations and in the enbd the club decided not to sign him, he wanted too much money.
You are a tad confused again, but thats ok

[rooster_booster]

Posted by Rocky Rhodes

Gee if you believe everything you read in the papers why not believe the initial post in this thread.

Noyce refused to give a reason why he was dismissed, put two and two together weedy.

Clueless dumbass!.

Yet you believed Rothfield when he said 2 senior players wanted out. Where did he write that, moron? Oh yep, it was in the papers,

[Guest]

Rothfield is wrong.

It's not just 2 players.

[Guest]

Rothfield is wrong.

It's not just 2 players.

[Guest]

what does this mean

[Guest]

what does this mean

I have absolutely no idea.

[Guest]

Rothfield is wrong.

It's not just 2 players.

Oh Freddles you have really taken some angry pills.
Whats the matter has someone told the players they can't be your friends anymore ?

[Guest]

Oh Freddles you have really taken some angry pills.
Whats the matter has someone told the players they can't be your friends anymore ?

Just Freds agenda too get rid of Smith

[Vasco]

huh, wtf are you carrying on about dribbler? The club made a decision to keep Ryles for another year (whether re-signing him or taking up an option on him is irrelevant) so something must have happened for the club to change that decision. Obviously a falling out with smith hence the original story was on the money. Surely you get it now einstein!

Dumbass!

Perhaps he was the one to make room for getting SBW.

I don't think that is too hard to believe.

[Guest]

Oh Freddles you have really taken some angry pills.
Whats the matter has someone told the players they can't be your friends anymore ?

I dont know any players. I dont base my opinions on which player talks to the fans back at the club or which player is polite to fans at the crappy fan days that most of the players dont want to be at.

No angry pills.

Just reality.

[Guest]

Just Freds agenda too get rid of Smith

Its an easy agenda, more will join me soon.