Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Judiciary

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Anyone know the judiciary order of the 3 cases tonight, hope JWH is first up, don't really want to wait around till midnight to find out if he is cleared or not.

    Comment


    • #17
      He will be last the hearing will take two hours and they will find him guilty. Hope in wrong but that’s how it feels it always goes for us.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Jacks Fur Coat View Post
        The panel on 100% Footy tonite was unanimous that JWH should get off, no case to answer. Gould, Gallen , Lockyer and two journos.
        Even Blocker on Controversial Corner said JWH has no case to answer.

        Comment


        • #19
          Raiders mouthpiece Ennis insists JWH must be banned, "he made contact with the head Case closed".

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Mickie Lane View Post

            Even Blocker on Controversial Corner said JWH has no case to answer.
            That gives me little confidence. He is second dumbest commentator around.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Thirteen View Post

              That gives me little confidence. He is second dumbest commentator around.
              Agreed. If hes in our corner, we should be very worried indeed!
              FVCK CANCER

              Comment


              • #22
                Todd Greenturd planning on making an appearance tonight?
                Written and published on behalf of the Liberal Party, Queensland

                Comment


                • #23
                  unfortunately I think they will balance up the ledger , with Burgess being suspended, by giving Jared the week....the 'concocted' outrage of Jwh getting off and burgess missing the game will be too much for the rabble to bear....all the logic that he should get off , I fear will come to nought.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Does anyone know the order tonight at the judiciary? Also what’s the best twitter feed to get updates?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      JWH is first up at the Judiciary, his case starts at 6pm.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        There is a special NRL Tonight on Fox Sports News from the Judiciary at 7pm for those interested, might be right around the time JWH's verdict is known.

                        Good news is Sean Garlick is not on the judiciary panel tonight.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          JWH was first up at 6pm.

                          Still no news.

                          That's not bad news...

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            theres not many live updates coming out. media isnt milking it as much as last year

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              "JWH:Tried to make catching tackle and flinched when Knights hand contacted my face causing contact with bicep to head. Recognise duty of care.
                              NRL Councel: JWH braced for contact and turned head, resulting in careless contact with arm to head."

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Waerea-Hargreaves's key defence is around Liam Knight's left arm striking him in the face as he was falling.

                                "I was hoping Liam Knight was going to fall into my chest. But as soon as I flinched [as a result of the contact my face], it opened me up to where he fell on my bicep," he says.

                                Waerea-Hargreaves and his defence James McLeod are arguing his contact on Knight was unavoidable, and that Waerea-Hargreaves "softened" his right arm before contact in a bid to make a "catching" tackle.

                                Waerea-Hargreaves's counsel James McLeod: "What more could Waerea-Hargreaves have reasonably done in the circumstances?"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X