Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rumours around Friend will be on the bench Butcher will miss out

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    This is like the Maubbs to half back at the GF. If Friend does play I don’t think Trent will be shafting Nat.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Bansai Pipeline View Post
      I’ve come around to Jake.

      He’ll die in the middle for us.

      Here’s hoping that’s not until the 79th minute.
      I'm more concerned with a recurrence of either of the two injuries. His toughness isn't in question. But they aren't the type of injuries that you can just play through.

      i just don't know what they should do. Glad it's not my call.

      Comment


      • #18
        No knock on you, fletch, but gee "around" has become an annoying buzzword in league circles. Everything is around this, around that.

        All you needed to say there was, "Rumours Friend will be on the bench and Butcher to miss out."

        The other one is people saying "our game" all the time. No one any more can ever just say "the game" - it must always be "our game". "I don't think it's needed in our game". "In our game I think he's the best player" "It's an embarrassment for our game".

        On and on it goes.

        Comment


        • #19
          If Jakes calf is 100%, then he will play. He will start and play for 20 odd minutes and Sam comes on. What happens after that depends on the game for those 2.
          Lui, Tets and Angus will do their stuff as usual.
          I'd start with SST and JWH up front.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View Post

            I'm more concerned with a recurrence of either of the two injuries. His toughness isn't in question. But they aren't the type of injuries that you can just play through.

            i just don't know what they should do. Glad it's not my call.
            Yeah IMO Verrills has earned his place and Friend just needs to calm down + spend 3 months recovering properly.

            Unlike Cronk, he hasn't played all season, we've been successful without him and his presence probably won't add much to our prospects (even if 100% fit). If anything, it would be pretty poor leadership to let a youngester earn a spot in the GF and then punt him at last minute. I can't see Friend doing that as it's sorta a d!ck move...

            Makes me wonder if it's mostly a push tactic for Verrills so that he realises he's gotta train hard + maintain form if he wants his spot in the GF. If it does that (and offers us an out if he's not performing) then IMO it's great!

            Looking forward to seeing Jake in 2020.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Kelby View Post
              If Jakes calf is 100%, then he will play. He will start and play for 20 odd minutes and Sam comes on. What happens after that depends on the game for those 2.
              Lui, Tets and Angus will do their stuff as usual.
              I'd start with SST and JWH up front.
              No way will they have SST and JWH start … because then they would both be off at the same time.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View Post
                No knock on you, fletch, but gee "around" has become an annoying buzzword in league circles. Everything is around this, around that.

                All you needed to say there was, "Rumours Friend will be on the bench and Butcher to miss out."

                The other one is people saying "our game" all the time. No one any more can ever just say "the game" - it must always be "our game". "I don't think it's needed in our game". "In our game I think he's the best player" "It's an embarrassment for our game".

                On and on it goes.
                Maybe you should start a thread in the website/forums suggestions section around the acceptable vernacular we can use when discussing our team in our game Tom?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by NorfolkStreetKid View Post

                  No way will they have SST and JWH start … because then they would both be off at the same time.
                  Either one can play big minutes. Jwh is fresh and sst can play long. I can see one of these going the first 40 and this helps the rotation of the others.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View Post
                    No knock on you, fletch, but gee "around" has become an annoying buzzword in league circles. Everything is around this, around that.

                    All you needed to say there was, "Rumours Friend will be on the bench and Butcher to miss out."

                    The other one is people saying "our game" all the time. No one any more can ever just say "the game" - it must always be "our game". "I don't think it's needed in our game". "In our game I think he's the best player" "It's an embarrassment for our game".

                    On and on it goes.
                    Luckily for you, there is a thread to air your gripes
                    Watching and listening to League over the years, I hear a lot of words that get repeated and become part of the Rugby League lexicon. These words stand out to
                    ..it’ll be interesting to see

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by The Lip View Post
                      It came from Verills himself after last weeks PF win. They interviewed him and he said it was a shame Jake got the calf injury because he was really looking forward to playing with him this week. Sounds like a big slip up in letting that out from Sam rather than an organised set up in my opinion.

                      So since that remark everyone is assuming Jake is playing this week if the calf is okay and he will play with Sam in the side as well so a bench player has to make way.
                      I think Verrills was on instructions to say that.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by The Skeez View Post

                        Luckily for you, there is a thread to air your gripes
                        Awesome Skeez thanks all the buzzwords in and around our game!

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Johnny Tobin View Post

                          I think Verrills was on instructions to say that.
                          Did think of that myself JT maybe but it appeared pretty natural.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            If Friend is fit he will start.
                            I predict he will get a line break / assist and a try / assist.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by The Corner Post View Post
                              If Friend is fit he will start.
                              I predict he will get a line break / assist and a try / assist.
                              See the way Paps shoved Cook out of the way to score? Cook has been woeful in the finals and in defence for the little that Sam has played he has been solid but on the line he’s still learning. If Jake is included it will be for his defence though we lose out on Sams precisión passing and match fitness.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View Post
                                No knock on you, fletch, but gee "around" has become an annoying buzzword in league circles. Everything is around this, around that.

                                All you needed to say there was, "Rumours Friend will be on the bench and Butcher to miss out."

                                The other one is people saying "our game" all the time. No one any more can ever just say "the game" - it must always be "our game". "I don't think it's needed in our game". "In our game I think he's the best player" "It's an embarrassment for our game".

                                On and on it goes.
                                Dumbest post in the history of the forum.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X