Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SMH - "Independent, Always"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SMH - "Independent, Always"

    For a laugh, have a look at the SMH NRL page. You'll find the following.

    Adam Pengilly - "If the caps fits - roosters down raiders amid controversy". Article starts off and ends with salary cap cheating innuendo, says all the luck went with us and that the trainer was our 14th player. No mention the Cronk sin bin might have been harsh. To have one of their lead articles after a tough GF win rehashing the snide and tired salary cap bitching angle proves once and for all what a bunch of haters these wankers are.

    Adrian Proszenko - "Raiders Robbed By Refereeing Howlers". Now that's a very interesting title because Adam lists 3 "howlers" - the 6 again call, the trainer rebound (which he admits was the correct call, just bad luck) AND the Cronk sinbin. So then Adrian, you meant singular "howler" (which itself was in fact a correct call, albeit delayed).

    Adam Pengilly - "Write What You Think - Stuart Bites Tongue On Grand Final Call". Yes Adam, by now we get it, but just for clarity he again states this was the "match defining play". BTW Ricky didn't really bite his tongue, he made it clear with the "write what you think" BS that he believed he was robbed. So yet again he was a whining sore losing bitch.

    Phil Lutton - "As it Happened - Refereeing Call Clouds Roosters Triumph". Actually apart from title, this guy does what none of his colleagues had the guts to do, to give credit to our amazing D.


    Haters gotta hate. We are the champs. How sweet it is!!





  • #2
    I haven’t bought it for years - had an opportunity to position itself as it suggests as independent and informed but routinely fails as it lurches toward Murdochs Muppets standards - continuing on the pathway of Dead media walking.

    Social media and forums are my primary source of info these days.

    Comment


    • #3
      Yeah, but what are you going to do about it.

      I'm over complaining about the way the media is reporting it.

      The media complained about Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address when he delivered it.

      B2B for the first time in 26 years speaks for itself.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Frozen Chook View Post
        I haven’t bought it for years - had an opportunity to position itself as it suggests as independent and informed but routinely fails as it lurches toward Murdochs Muppets standards - continuing on the pathway of Dead media walking.

        Social media and forums are my primary source of info these days.
        Oh I wouldn't give them a penny either. These guys are gonna have to find a real job soon, print media dying, and thanks to these wankers, that's a good thing.

        Comment


        • #5
          They talk like raiders were guaranteed to score with six to go, to good, they can go fcuk themselves.

          Comment


          • #6
            being there i dont remember too many canberra tries, i do however remember two of ours!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by player 1 View Post
              For a laugh, have a look at the SMH NRL page. You'll find the following.

              Adam Pengilly - "If the caps fits - roosters down raiders amid controversy". Article starts off and ends with salary cap cheating innuendo, says all the luck went with us and that the trainer was our 14th player. No mention the Cronk sin bin might have been harsh. To have one of their lead articles after a tough GF win rehashing the snide and tired salary cap bitching angle proves once and for all what a bunch of haters these wankers are.

              Adrian Proszenko - "Raiders Robbed By Refereeing Howlers". Now that's a very interesting title because Adam lists 3 "howlers" - the 6 again call, the trainer rebound (which he admits was the correct call, just bad luck) AND the Cronk sinbin. So then Adrian, you meant singular "howler" (which itself was in fact a correct call, albeit delayed).

              Adam Pengilly - "Write What You Think - Stuart Bites Tongue On Grand Final Call". Yes Adam, by now we get it, but just for clarity he again states this was the "match defining play". BTW Ricky didn't really bite his tongue, he made it clear with the "write what you think" BS that he believed he was robbed. So yet again he was a whining sore losing bitch.

              Phil Lutton - "As it Happened - Refereeing Call Clouds Roosters Triumph". Actually apart from title, this guy does what none of his colleagues had the guts to do, to give credit to our amazing D.


              Haters gotta hate. We are the champs. How sweet it is!!



              Exactly my thoughts when I flicked through the SMH this morning. In fact you pretty much wrote what I would have but you’ve saved me the time.

              I still read the SMH out of habit, remembering it from the broadsheet days when they used to have proper journalists. Sad to see it reduced to this level of tabloid sensationalist rubbish.

              Comment


              • #8
                So much bias. The decision was corrected. We didn’t score until the 4th tackle so whatever happened to the raiders defense. Just sore losers. Did Stuart publicly congratulate us on our win? He gives the impression he doesn’t accept the result. But only recently he was praising refs for their strip rule enforcement. He’s anti Rugby League goading newspapers to condemn the GF. He said he didn’t want to sound unsportsmanlike but then urged the reporters to do his dirty work for him by proxy.
                “Soon will the present day order be rolled up, and a new one spread out in its stead”- (Baha’u’llah)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Maxy Walker View Post

                  Exactly my thoughts when I flicked through the SMH this morning. In fact you pretty much wrote what I would have but you’ve saved me the time.

                  I still read the SMH out of habit, remembering it from the broadsheet days when they used to have proper journalists. Sad to see it reduced to this level of tabloid sensationalist rubbish.
                  Another brilliant post by player 1 and I'm in the same boat as you Maxy with regards to the smh. With reporting like that, they won't be getting a cent of my money.
                  "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."

                  Thomas Jefferson

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Lutton supports souffs, he puts our club down at every opportunity.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The articles will provide some entertainment when I'm back at work tomorrow where the work subscription means I can read it for free. God knows I'd never pay out of my own pocket to read their drivvle.
                      Supporting the RW&B, through good times and bad times.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Any paper that has the red bandana twat writing for it is a paper to ignore.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          hate/click-bait articles attract more readers unfortunately

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by King Salvo View Post
                            Any paper that has the red bandana twat writing for it is a paper to ignore.
                            Smartest thing you have ever written King. He's a pompous fool of the highest order

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Sterlo said the roosters deserved to win for their defence, and he knows more about the game than all these flogs combined. That's good enough for me.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X