Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Positives & negatives

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I think Toups showed he is vulnerable to the sledge. That apparently the tactic they used sucessfully.
    Manu I think they are keeping him as a serious option until later in the year.
    Flannagan if he keeps his feet on the ground will be something very special

    Melbourne are a shadow of their former selves. To just beat the Roosters who were a 20 point worse side on the day than they should be shows they aren't that good.
    The Internet is a place for posting silly things
    Try and be serious and you will look stupid
    sigpic

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Paddo Colt 61 View Post
      Cooper would have closed that game out. Chooks thought it was all over after the Keary FG hence the two short kick off blunders - one...okay..two...WTF? On the other hand Smith (Cronk's mentor over the years) was as decisive in those last few minutes as he had been all game. That sweeping pass to Papenhausen was the same one that Cronk threw to Latrell to get the one point win against the Storm in Adelaide last year. Whatever, it was a terrific game but can we beat Melbourne without the Cronkster?
      "We"....haha.

      Can Souths make the playoffs with OldManBennett driving the ricketty bus?
      #We Stand with ourJewish community#

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Paddo Colt 61 View Post
        Cooper would have closed that game out. Chooks thought it was all over after the Keary FG hence the two short kick off blunders - one...okay..two...WTF? On the other hand Smith (Cronk's mentor over the years) was as decisive in those last few minutes as he had been all game. That sweeping pass to Papenhausen was the same one that Cronk threw to Latrell to get the one point win against the Storm in Adelaide last year. Whatever, it was a terrific game but can we beat Melbourne without the Cronkster?
        Radley threw the pass from dummy half to Latrell.

        Comment


        • #34
          Ashley Klein

          Brisbane 36 110 122.5 0.90
          Canberra 39 146.5 134 1.09
          Canterbury 35 105.5 111.5 0.95
          Cronulla 35 117 113.5 1.03
          Gold Coast Titans 25 83 89.5 0.93
          Manly 26 94.5 91 1.04
          Melbourne 45 154.5 146.5 1.05
          New Zealand 34 99 103 0.96
          Newcastle 35 117.5 121.5 0.97
          North Queensland 36 117.5 103 1.14
          Parramatta 37 119.5 125.5 0.95
          Penrith 31 112.5 113 1.00
          Souths 44 158 136.5 1.16
          St George Illawarra 41 144 134.5 1.07
          Sydney Roosters 43 120.5 164.5 0.73
          Wests Tigers 32 107.5 97 1.11
          *Dual referees' penalties count half
          The Rooster errors in the game were substantially caused by Klein's refereeing. The above table shows the raw deal the roosters get under Klein. When the game is put under the microscope errors are caused by fatigue and frustration. The Storm layed in the tackle longer than any of the past 5 games the Roosters played yet only 1 repeat set of 6 was awarded by Klein in the second half and on the first tackle. Conversely the storms 10 metres was skinny and they jumped early making it really difficult for the roosters yardage Both caused the frustration and fatigue which led to the highest error count I've seen by the roosters in recent memory. Against a lesser team the Roosters unbelievably good defence could prevail, but klein did enough to cause our loss. Last week Cecchin gave multiple restarts for 0.5 second delay in releasing a player in a non rooster game... The storm had at least 1.5 seconds to slow down the play...

          Comment


          • #35
            The Rooster errors in the game were substantially caused by Klein's refereeing. Under Klein the rooster have the worst ratio of penalties for and against,120 for 164 against. When the game is put under the microscope errors are caused by fatigue and frustration. The Storm layed in the tackle longer than any of the past 5 games the Roosters played yet only 1 repeat set of 6 was awarded by Klein in the second half and on the first tackle. Conversely the storms 10 metres was skinny and they jumped early making it really difficult for the roosters yardage Both caused the frustration and fatigue which led to the highest error count I've seen by the roosters in recent memory. Against a lesser team the Roosters unbelievably good defence could prevail, but klein did enough to cause our loss. Last week Cecchin gave multiple restarts for 0.5 second delay in releasing a player in a non rooster game... The storm had at least 1.5 seconds to slow down the play...

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by gragra View Post
              The Rooster errors in the game were substantially caused by Klein's refereeing. Under Klein the rooster have the worst ratio of penalties for and against,120 for 164 against. When the game is put under the microscope errors are caused by fatigue and frustration. The Storm layed in the tackle longer than any of the past 5 games the Roosters played yet only 1 repeat set of 6 was awarded by Klein in the second half and on the first tackle. Conversely the storms 10 metres was skinny and they jumped early making it really difficult for the roosters yardage Both caused the frustration and fatigue which led to the highest error count I've seen by the roosters in recent memory. Against a lesser team the Roosters unbelievably good defence could prevail, but klein did enough to cause our loss. Last week Cecchin gave multiple restarts for 0.5 second delay in releasing a player in a non rooster game... The storm had at least 1.5 seconds to slow down the play...
              Toops errors had nothing to do with the Ref. Cordners forced offload that led to a storm try had nothing to do with the ref. We were way off our standard yet still should have got the cash

              Comment

              Working...
              X