is andrew voss taking the piss with commentary wtf he has an annoying voice sarcasm to go wih it i dont really like any othe other commentators but he is in a league of his own he says the most stupid things just like in the video game
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Andrew voss
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by SupermanSupportsEasts4Eva View PostVossy does make the odd sarcastic comment every now and again, but he is very passionate about the game. I can put up with Vossy because he is neutral and calls the game as he sees it, compared to many other so called experts on both Fox and C9 who''s bias is ridiculously obvious.
My commentary would basically involve sledging the refs, sledging Souffs, calling the Storm/Faders pretenders and calling the game rigged/corrupt whenever we lose.
Some keep a neutral face better than others when it comes to footy. IMO the closer you are, the harder it gets too (e.g. I remember hearing Slater calling a Roosters v Storm game... he was all cocky when the Drizz were winning, then went dead quiet when we got on top of them... had very little to say about our win after the game). I excuse Slater coz we woulda lost a GF to us the year before that. However, I have less sympathy for guys who haven't played for 30+ years and just talk garbage.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by ism22 View Post
IMO part of the challenge is that if you know your stuff about footy then you'll have to have watched a lot of it (and you'll inevitably need to have a team...etc).
My commentary would basically involve sledging the refs, sledging Souffs, calling the Storm/Faders pretenders and calling the game rigged/corrupt whenever we lose.
Some keep a neutral face better than others when it comes to footy. IMO the closer you are, the harder it gets too (e.g. I remember hearing Slater calling a Roosters v Storm game... he was all cocky when the Drizz were winning, then went dead quiet when we got on top of them... had very little to say about our win after the game). I excuse Slater coz we woulda lost a GF to us the year before that. However, I have less sympathy for guys who haven't played for 30+ years and just talk garbage.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by ism22 View Post
IMO part of the challenge is that if you know your stuff about footy then you'll have to have watched a lot of it (and you'll inevitably need to have a team...etc).
My commentary would basically involve sledging the refs, sledging Souffs, calling the Storm/Faders pretenders and calling the game rigged/corrupt whenever we lose.
Some keep a neutral face better than others when it comes to footy. IMO the closer you are, the harder it gets too (e.g. I remember hearing Slater calling a Roosters v Storm game... he was all cocky when the Drizz were winning, then went dead quiet when we got on top of them... had very little to say about our win after the game). I excuse Slater coz we woulda lost a GF to us the year before that. However, I have less sympathy for guys who haven't played for 30+ years and just talk garbage.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Sorry zinga, I have to disagree with you on this one.
I think Vossy is probably the best and most impartial commentator in the business at the moment.MRR or Rabid
Some people believe supporting the Roosters
is a matter of life and death, I am very disappointed
with that attitude. I can assure you it is
much, much more important than that.
(1981 Bill Shankly quote variation)
- 1 like
Comment
Comment