Grubs cover up

[Rooster1908]

I don't think the timing is bad. Timing wouldn't be a factor if it never happened in the first place. I don't blame the doctor. I blame the user.

Stop making sense

[Johnny Tobin]

Rooster1908; . "....It is there responsibility to stop problems before they occur . Its called duty of care . What if he seriously hurt his wife and kids and they could have prevented it. "

It's a family matter friend. Nowt to do with the club. If me auntie...etc.

This hatchet job presents affidavit claims as fact.

To others who have taken ism to task, women should be believed, initially, so should men. My experience is that some females (and some males but fewer) can over egg things, especially when children and custody is an issue, and seem more inclined to feel that their emotional reactions are the be all and end all.

Club doctor covering up drug use and writing illegal scripts is a family thing?

Souffs

[Stewie Griffin]

Poor old Colt is like the drowning man who would clutch at serpents to save himself.

[Johnny Tobin]

Poor old Colt is like the drowning man who would clutch at serpents to save himself.

Only with his left hand.

He would rather drown than admit there is anything good on the right.

[NorfolkStreetKid]

Poor old Colt is like the drowning man who would clutch at serpents to save himself.

Go easy on PC 61, mental illness is not a joking matter.

[The Lip]

Its like a root mate. Just putting the tip in is still going in. Drug users are drug users. They get lumped onto the same pile for mine.

Yeah look I think you’re missing my point - you think what you want about drug use I am not in the slightest contesting what you think of drug use - I’m am however saying someone who uses drugs and doesn’t abuse their pregnant wife is different to someone who uses drugs and does.

[OMR]

Compare this to the way the roosters dealt with Carter and SKD after the Ivy episode . Proud to be a rooster.

[top_joe]

The Australian must have all the evidence they need to print this without worry of bein sued.

Slamming Sam just got slammed.

[Rooster90]

Club has always been scum, the amount of cover ups in recent years with Inglis, Roberts x 1000 and Sutton.....

Culture goes back to the beginnings in 1909 when they agreed not to play the GF then turned up anyway to win by default.

[chopstiks]

Christ. The entire thing is sickening.

The footy side, the cover ups.

The DV, relentless psycho abuse.

I dont really care about the Mr Hooke part, and Julie with the orange juice and crumpets business as usual nothing to see here. Every story is told to suit the person telling it, but there's no getting around Burgess being enabled by those around him, as an abuser in more ways than one.
Revolting all around.

[Paddo Colt 61]

[QUOTE=OMR. Compare this to the way the roosters dealt with Carter and SKD after the Ivy episode . Proud to be a rooster.

No compare it to the way they handled the SKD/Nova Peris situation. Supported him but kept out of it.

So many here accepting this Oz article as fact when it's not, it's assertion, freely asserted at that. It could not be a more egregious hatchet job but that's stock in trade for the Catholic Boys' Weekly.

That a doctor did what he was alleged to have done is not fact, it's allegation. It could be that, in the heat and tumult of the situation, he filled out the script mistakenly or Ol' Mitch, that devious, cunning old nark, may have wanted the valium for himself. Either that or he was a couple of plays ahead of the rest of them thinking of his dubious ATO claim. I don't know, these things will be sorted if it ever comes to that, but all of youse (you know whom I mean) don't know either.

Good and evil are largely dependent on point of view. Muslims in the 'Stans and Iraq didn't see 9/11 as evil. They saw it as a fair cop given the calamity that the US had wrought on them.

I hope that Media Watch gives this "investigative report" a run. The ridicule will be palpable.

[rented tracksuit]

Stop making sense

my apologies.

[rented tracksuit]

Yeah look I think you’re missing my point - you think what you want about drug use I am not in the slightest contesting what you think of drug use - I’m am however saying someone who uses drugs and doesn’t abuse their pregnant wife is different to someone who uses drugs and does.

I get what you are saying mate but if the abuse come while under the influence, then the substance is abuse could be to blame.

Now its not the substance's fault, not the person who gives it to the user but its the users fault for taking it. For mine, blame will always lie with the person who uses regardless of what they do while under the influence. The outcome is the by product of the usage and (apparently) both were users.

Not arguing with you Lippy. Just trying to explain my views.

[Paddo Colt 61]

[QUOTE=top_joe; "The Australian must have all the evidence they need to print this without worry of bein sued."

You're kidding surely? Geoffrey Rush is just one who comes to mind. Maybe you might google - News Ltd. Defamation suits.

Mein Gott there's some rubbish uttered on this site. Mouth ahead of brain stuff (that's if there are functioning brains). No wonder a lot of you vote against your own economic interests.

[Steakface]

PaddoColt sounds like he has swanned in straight off 'The Warren' Souths forum.

95% of the posters on there right now are crying conspiracy theory and blaming everything and everyone - including Uncle Nick - for the choices of Sam Burgess and the choices of certain members of staff at the Rabbitohs Club.

With an investigative story this comprehensive, the paper's Legal Counsel would have gone through this with a fine tooth comb over weeks to clear it for publication. It's not just a bunch of speculation thrown out there. Successful defamation suits against media do exist, but they are quite rare - and success rarer still - when put in the context of the incredible volume of stories published.