game management a problem? you can always do better but i'd like us to make less errors and defend better throughout the game.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Game management in close games?
Collapse
X
-
Really interesting topic, because it's been a bugbear of mine for 20 years. Prime example being the 2004 GF when we had so much possession in the second half but we played like headless chooks.
It's only in 18 & 19 when we had Cronk I felt comfortable in tight games but apart from this, I've never felt comfortable in tight games.
I think part of this is the culture of how Easts want to play footy - we don't play conservative forward based low percentage footy like the Dogs. We want to express ourselves and play with a bit of glamour. Its in our DNA and that's why we can make some mistakes, but if it pulls off we could put a cricket score on. eg Friday night: Teddy's long cut out passes and bat ons; Keary's long cut out passes near the opp tryline ala 2018 GF - it came off for Toup's try, but didn't for JAC intercept. It's just the way we play the game I think. Low percentage, high risk but high returns if it comes off and our defence holds them out.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by ROC181 View Post
That’s funny! I was talking to a non Roosters friend yesterday telling him that a Thurston, Cronk or Smith would have realised that they were a little too far to kick it and he didn’t receive the ball properly to take the kick, would have reacted to the opposition players charge and would have changed it to either spreading the ball to the right or a small up and under, like Cronk used to do and that might have been a better option...
My friend thought I was a little too harsh on Luke, which I wasn’t. Luke’s great but to reach at the level of ‘immortal’, you need to have the ability to react when you’re in the back foot. Perhaps he’s still having problems with his injuries?
What worried me was one earlier on where he booted the ball into an opposition player on the last tackle, gifting them VERY generous possession when we needed it badly.
Meh. Keary's been good though, I don't wanna talk like he's the one responsible for that loss. We let those player go right through the middle of us sooo many times!
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by roosterproud View PostOur drop kick at the end. Keary should have run it with a grubber to finish it off. He doesnt seem to have eyes up football in him anymore
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by dice View Post
The ball was touched. Who knows if it would have gone over?
I also thought Cordner could have charged down Cleary's attempt but turned to protect his head.
Comment
-
Originally posted by zac View Postgame management a problem? you can always do better but i'd like us to make less errors and defend better throughout the game.MRR or Rabid
Some people believe supporting the Roosters
is a matter of life and death, I am very disappointed
with that attitude. I can assure you it is
much, much more important than that.
(1981 Bill Shankly quote variation)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mad_Rabid_Rooster View Post
I agree zac, our defense needs work, and our discipline has been an issue during the past 15 years. The latter has not stopped us, but the former has been uncharacteristically poor of late.
freddy did well but jake's one of our best defenders and more dominant than freddy so him coming back is good. also, in an environment where it's harder to keep your opps to 0 we need to keep our structures and connectedness even if we've let in a try or two and just hang tough.
Comment
-
Originally posted by roosterproud View PostOur drop kick at the end. Keary should have run it with a grubber to finish it off. He doesnt seem to have eyes up football in him anymoreTwo things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe
Comment
-
Cronk would have also been a calm influence at 10-0 up.
Cronk would have demanded calm and played for a repeat set.
Instead we pushed the pass and hand over the pill. Penriff go up field and the rest is history.Born and bred in the eastern suburbs.
Comment
-
In the Melbourne game, if we had caught the ball from the short kick off we would have won. Also if poor concussed Boyd has played the ball like everyone else does, roll between your feet without the chance of your studs trapping the ball we would have won, or we had got a 50:50 on the knock on no knock on we would have won.
For the Manly game I think Flanno missed a sitter but has more than made up for it since with some great side line kicks
Dare I say there was probably only one person that could have kicked the FG on Friday and he doesnot play for us anymore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bruce 38-0 View PostIn the Melbourne game, if we had caught the ball from the short kick off we would have won. Also if poor concussed Boyd has played the ball like everyone else does, roll between your feet without the chance of your studs trapping the ball we would have won, or we had got a 50:50 on the knock on no knock on we would have won.
For the Manly game I think Flanno missed a sitter but has more than made up for it since with some great side line kicks
Dare I say there was probably only one person that could have kicked the FG on Friday and he doesnot play for us anymore.
Comment
Comment