[QUOTE=Paddo Colt 61;n858794]
Looks like I moved , thought you said I was from Coona . Again don't care what sort of bloke the father in law is .Hes not the one on trial . Bargass was a great footballer , doesn't make him a great human . Always and I mean always er on the side of the female and the kids . The bloke has been accused of domestic violence among other things and we all know how that ends up on numerous occasions . Surely even the salt of the earth type like yourself would agree to defend the safety of the family first . at least I hope you would.
Originally posted by Maxy Walker; Nothing to do with the politics. Everything to do with all the pro Burgess, anti Burgess in laws posts. No real easts fan would give a damn about that rubbish.
I tend to disagree Maxy. I think that you may find that the saner group among us take an interest in all things League and many value (though certainly do not love) the Bunnies for the entertainment they provide such as those memorable duels between Sammy Burgess and the youngun Dylan Napper who aways seemed to keep his best and biggest hits for the Pride.
I'd reckon that most here would regard Sam B as a mighty force of nature in the game and as one of us in a more general sense. Only the narks among us would take the side of the lyin' squatocracy jerk (Gina's front man) who never would have wanted him as a son in law on social class grounds alone. Why believe anything that he and his media mates had to say?
[B
I tend to disagree Maxy. I think that you may find that the saner group among us take an interest in all things League and many value (though certainly do not love) the Bunnies for the entertainment they provide such as those memorable duels between Sammy Burgess and the youngun Dylan Napper who aways seemed to keep his best and biggest hits for the Pride.
I'd reckon that most here would regard Sam B as a mighty force of nature in the game and as one of us in a more general sense. Only the narks among us would take the side of the lyin' squatocracy jerk (Gina's front man) who never would have wanted him as a son in law on social class grounds alone. Why believe anything that he and his media mates had to say?
[B
Comment