Originally posted by Rooster1908
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lam Junior
Collapse
X
-
def not going to speak for others here, my 2 cents is obviously i was disappointed with lams performance at the weekend . i thought he somewhat stifled the attack, and didn't really offer a hell of a lot in the 80 mins .
i defintley hope he goes out and absolutley kills it this weekend, not sure he will, but if he improves fantastic. the good thing with young lam is that if he does succeed he would be more likely to stay at the roosters for less given his ties to the club.
that in my book is a real positive.
maybe long term if walker develops as expected , he could play a mortimer type role in 2013, subbing jake or sam .
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by mattyh View Postdef not going to speak for others here, my 2 cents is obviously i was disappointed with lams performance at the weekend . i thought he somewhat stifled the attack, and didn't really offer a hell of a lot in the 80 mins .
i defintley hope he goes out and absolutley kills it this weekend, not sure he will, but if he improves fantastic. the good thing with young lam is that if he does succeed he would be more likely to stay at the roosters for less given his ties to the club.
that in my book is a real positive.
maybe long term if walker develops as expected , he could play a mortimer type role in 2013, subbing jake or sam .
im not saying he is why we won by 40 on the weekend or even why we won the game I am thinking of from last year by 50ish. I am also jury out on Lachie as our 5/8 but I do get the feeling without going back through stats the couple off times he has started and played in the halves we have had big big wins - so to say he stifles is definitely not correct. IMHO
Comment
-
I don't see whats wrong with this thread.
We all want whats best for our beloved Roosters, but we are bound to have different opinions.
IMO, Lam is a weakness in a very important position, and I've stated reasons for this without resorting to abuse those who disagree with me. Some people on this site are unreasonable.
- 4 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by eddie View PostI don't see whats wrong with this thread.
We all want whats best for our beloved Roosters, but we are bound to have different opinions.
IMO, Lam is a weakness in a very important position, and I've stated reasons for this without resorting to abuse those who disagree with me. Some people on this site are unreasonable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post
So if your workmates or customers question what you bought to the workplace you would be happy enough ,
Lam plays a high profile sport, earns more than the average joe, is on telly every week and has passionate fans wanting to see him perform.
I think he knew what he signed up for.
People dont pay money to watch others work for bunnings.
All first grade league players get questioned.
- 5 likes
Comment
-
We can find errors , poor form or whatever you want to call it in any player person or employee everywhere , just depends on how hard you want to look or judge . The majority on this thread disagree with your thoughts or the way you have gone about it. Think that may be an indication to you but it seems not
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster1908 View PostWe can find errors , poor form or whatever you want to call it in any player person or employee everywhere , just depends on how hard you want to look or judge . The majority on this thread disagree with your thoughts or the way you have gone about it. Think that may be an indication to you but it seems not
The worst thing about this thread is certain Lam supporters hurling abuse instead of presenting a contrary argument.
I'm pleased to say that you're not in that catagory, but I don't understand why you seem to think that players should be immune from criticism.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by eddie View Post
Well, I'm not on my pat malone.
The worst thing about this thread is certain Lam supporters hurling abuse instead of presenting a contrary argument.
I'm pleased to say that you're not in that catagory, but I don't understand why you seem to think that players should be immune from criticism.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by eddie View Post
Well, I'm not on my pat malone.
The worst thing about this thread is certain Lam supporters hurling abuse instead of presenting a contrary argument.
I'm pleased to say that you're not in that catagory, but I don't understand why you seem to think that players should be immune from criticism.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Larry Long Balls View PostYou have to admit it is not realistic to suggest the coach drop our #6 after we flogged Manly by 42 points in round one.
- 2 likes
Comment
Comment