Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lam Junior

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post

    I am discussing it until I was told by one of the so called supporters that only the ones who agreed with the opinion that Lam didn't have a future in the team were of any value to the discussion, read back and you will figure it out
    Fair enough!

    Comment


    • My man Hutch will be ready if the time comes.
      He was last season and will be this season.
      He was a bit rusty the other day, but is working up to his peak slowly and carefully.

      Comment


      • def not going to speak for others here, my 2 cents is obviously i was disappointed with lams performance at the weekend . i thought he somewhat stifled the attack, and didn't really offer a hell of a lot in the 80 mins .

        i defintley hope he goes out and absolutley kills it this weekend, not sure he will, but if he improves fantastic. the good thing with young lam is that if he does succeed he would be more likely to stay at the roosters for less given his ties to the club.

        that in my book is a real positive.

        maybe long term if walker develops as expected , he could play a mortimer type role in 2013, subbing jake or sam .


        Comment


        • Originally posted by mattyh View Post
          def not going to speak for others here, my 2 cents is obviously i was disappointed with lams performance at the weekend . i thought he somewhat stifled the attack, and didn't really offer a hell of a lot in the 80 mins .

          i defintley hope he goes out and absolutley kills it this weekend, not sure he will, but if he improves fantastic. the good thing with young lam is that if he does succeed he would be more likely to stay at the roosters for less given his ties to the club.

          that in my book is a real positive.

          maybe long term if walker develops as expected , he could play a mortimer type role in 2013, subbing jake or sam .

          I don’t get how anyone can say he stifled the attack when we won 46-4. I only remember one other game where Lam played half and started and played all game and we won that by 50 ish from a hazy memory.

          im not saying he is why we won by 40 on the weekend or even why we won the game I am thinking of from last year by 50ish. I am also jury out on Lachie as our 5/8 but I do get the feeling without going back through stats the couple off times he has started and played in the halves we have had big big wins - so to say he stifles is definitely not correct. IMHO

          Comment


          • Until Robbo deems Walker ready, Lam is the best we have.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Thirteen View Post
              Until Robbo deems Walker ready, Lam is the best we have.
              Bingo, we have a winner.

              Comment


              • I don't see whats wrong with this thread.
                We all want whats best for our beloved Roosters, but we are bound to have different opinions.
                IMO, Lam is a weakness in a very important position, and I've stated reasons for this without resorting to abuse those who disagree with me. Some people on this site are unreasonable.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by The Lip View Post

                  I don’t get how anyone can say he stifled the attack when we won 46-4.
                  Because he made mistakes that cost us in attack.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by eddie View Post
                    I don't see whats wrong with this thread.
                    We all want whats best for our beloved Roosters, but we are bound to have different opinions.
                    IMO, Lam is a weakness in a very important position, and I've stated reasons for this without resorting to abuse those who disagree with me. Some people on this site are unreasonable.
                    Yes they are aren't they

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post

                      So if your workmates or customers question what you bought to the workplace you would be happy enough ,
                      Poor comparison mate.
                      Lam plays a high profile sport, earns more than the average joe, is on telly every week and has passionate fans wanting to see him perform.
                      I think he knew what he signed up for.
                      People dont pay money to watch others work for bunnings.
                      All first grade league players get questioned.

                      Comment


                      • We can find errors , poor form or whatever you want to call it in any player person or employee everywhere , just depends on how hard you want to look or judge . The majority on this thread disagree with your thoughts or the way you have gone about it. Think that may be an indication to you but it seems not

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post
                          We can find errors , poor form or whatever you want to call it in any player person or employee everywhere , just depends on how hard you want to look or judge . The majority on this thread disagree with your thoughts or the way you have gone about it. Think that may be an indication to you but it seems not
                          Well, I'm not on my pat malone.
                          The worst thing about this thread is certain Lam supporters hurling abuse instead of presenting a contrary argument.
                          I'm pleased to say that you're not in that catagory, but I don't understand why you seem to think that players should be immune from criticism.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by eddie View Post

                            Well, I'm not on my pat malone.
                            The worst thing about this thread is certain Lam supporters hurling abuse instead of presenting a contrary argument.
                            I'm pleased to say that you're not in that catagory, but I don't understand why you seem to think that players should be immune from criticism.
                            You have to admit it is not realistic to suggest the coach drop our #6 after we flogged Manly by 42 points in round one.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by eddie View Post

                              Well, I'm not on my pat malone.
                              The worst thing about this thread is certain Lam supporters hurling abuse instead of presenting a contrary argument.
                              I'm pleased to say that you're not in that catagory, but I don't understand why you seem to think that players should be immune from criticism.
                              I don't think they should be immune from criticism, bit think when we will n 46 to 6 and he was moved from one position to another , has played 12 odd games then the criticism is unfair

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Larry Long Balls View Post
                                You have to admit it is not realistic to suggest the coach drop our #6 after we flogged Manly by 42 points in round one.
                                Perspective...It was Manly... In reality it's just concerning that we have some difficult games coming up from next week and that Lam may not be up to tackling the likes of Souffs, Warriors and Storm. I know Walker may not be ready even though he reckons he is. Like Thirteen said, Lam is the best option we have at the moment, but I am one wishing we still had Flanagan cause at least we could rest assure that we would get the 2 points conversions. Lets hope we see Lam step up on Sunday because he needs to give Keary some support for all the more difficult games coming up.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X