No Crichton, No Radley Rd12 Vs the Raiders

[Rooster1908]

Don’t you get a longer penalty if you get done for drink driving time and time again? Or if you break a good behaviour bond, don’t you get a harsher penalty?

Ism, can you clear this up for us please.

Better of asking Bargass for advice on how to get off

[TeddyGoat]

Wait so what's the go with Victors case? If he is successful at the judiciary how many weeks will he be out for? Just the one for his other charge he took the early plea on?

[King Salvo]

Wait so what's the go with Victors case? If he is successful at the judiciary how many weeks will he be out for? Just the one for his other charge he took the early plea on?

Judiciary panel hearings
6pm: Victor Radley
7.30pm: Angus Crichton
9pm: Elliott Whitehead


Radley pleaded guilty to the tackle on Albert - 120 points

Challenging the grading of the Pengai jnr tackle - grade 2 - wont have the early plea discount of 330 points if unsuccessful

If successful with a down grade from a grade 2 (200 points) to a grade 1 (100 points) but he has 2 prior similar offences (50% loading) plus 1 non similar offence ( 20 % loading )-

Grade 1 - 100 x 100% ( 2 x 50% loadings) = 200 plus 100 x 20% loading = 20 = 220 less 25% early plea = 165 points

Successful with down grade

120 points from early play for the Albert tackle
165 points ( 220 less 25% early plea discount )
285 points

Will miss 2 games and have 85 carryover points

Unsuccessful with down grade - i thought that an early plea and challenge of the grading if unsuccessful = original point allocation with no early plea discount as per what's on the NRL site

His Grade 2 was 440 ( 200 points plus 2 50% loading's for similar offences and 1 20% loading for non similar offence)

Meaning 120 + 440 = 560

Which is 5 games and 60 carryovers

An article i read said if unsuccessful with the downgrade he will miss 4 weeks for both ?

NRL site says the following

Most players will plead GUILTY. They receive a 25% discount on the total number of points incurred from their charge(s).

Unsuccessful = Original points allocation with No discount.
Successful = Lower number of points + 25% discount.
This is the gamble with challenging the grading or the charge and appearing before the Judiciary Panel.

[zac]

Wait so what's the go with Victors case? If he is successful at the judiciary how many weeks will he be out for? Just the one for his other charge he took the early plea on?

he'll still be out for a couple

[The Skeez]

Judiciary panel hearings
6pm: Victor Radley
7.30pm: Angus Crichton
9pm: Elliott Whitehead


Radley pleaded guilty to the tackle on Albert - 120 points

Challenging the grading of the Pengai jnr tackle - grade 2 - wont have the early plea discount of 330 points if unsuccessful

If successful with a down grade from a grade 2 (200 points) to a grade 1 (100 points) but he has 2 prior similar offences (50% loading) plus 1 non similar offence ( 20 % loading )-

Grade 1 - 100 x 100% ( 2 x 50% loadings) = 200 plus 100 x 20% loading = 20 = 220 less 25% early plea = 165 points

Successful with down grade

120 points from early play for the Albert tackle
165 points ( 220 less 25% early plea discount )
285 points

Will miss 2 games and have 85 carryover points

Unsuccessful with down grade - i thought that an early plea and challenge of the grading if unsuccessful = original point allocation with no early plea discount as per what's on the NRL site

His Grade 2 was 440 ( 200 points plus 2 50% loading's for similar offences and 1 20% loading for non similar offence)

Meaning 120 + 440 = 560

Which is 5 games and 60 carryovers

An article i read said if unsuccessful with the downgrade he will miss 4 weeks for both ?

NRL site says the following

Most players will plead GUILTY. They receive a 25% discount on the total number of points incurred from their charge(s).

Unsuccessful = Original points allocation with No discount.
Successful = Lower number of points + 25% discount.
This is the gamble with challenging the grading or the charge and appearing before the Judiciary Panel.

Phew.. thanks for clearing that up King.

[Jacks Fur Coat]

Judiciary panel hearings
6pm: Victor Radley
7.30pm: Angus Crichton
9pm: Elliott Whitehead


Radley pleaded guilty to the tackle on Albert - 120 points

Challenging the grading of the Pengai jnr tackle - grade 2 - wont have the early plea discount of 330 points if unsuccessful

If successful with a down grade from a grade 2 (200 points) to a grade 1 (100 points) but he has 2 prior similar offences (50% loading) plus 1 non similar offence ( 20 % loading )-

Grade 1 - 100 x 100% ( 2 x 50% loadings) = 200 plus 100 x 20% loading = 20 = 220 less 25% early plea = 165 points

Successful with down grade

120 points from early play for the Albert tackle
165 points ( 220 less 25% early plea discount )
285 points

Will miss 2 games and have 85 carryover points

Unsuccessful with down grade - i thought that an early plea and challenge of the grading if unsuccessful = original point allocation with no early plea discount as per what's on the NRL site

His Grade 2 was 440 ( 200 points plus 2 50% loading's for similar offences and 1 20% loading for non similar offence)

Meaning 120 + 440 = 560

Which is 5 games and 60 carryovers

An article i read said if unsuccessful with the downgrade he will miss 4 weeks for both ?

NRL site says the following

Most players will plead GUILTY. They receive a 25% discount on the total number of points incurred from their charge(s).

Unsuccessful = Original points allocation with No discount.
Successful = Lower number of points + 25% discount.
This is the gamble with challenging the grading or the charge and appearing before the Judiciary Panel.

So the panel is Radley, Crichton and Whitehead?

We might get off yet.

[DP1990]

Never trust a Greek

Except Nick Politis

[rented tracksuit]

Play the wankers into form is what we will do

For the first half anyway!

[King Salvo]

Phew.. thanks for clearing that up King.

I was correct if Radley is unsuccessful it will be 5 games- 560 points -And a lot of work in changing his tackling technique and maintaining match fitness

NRL prosecutor Peter McGrath submits that Radley “launched himself” at Pangai jnr, aimed to make contact above the ball and imparted “moderate force” upon impact. With there being a small margin for error in that contact zone, McGrath says Radley had a higher duty of care in the tackle.

He claims there was “direct contact to the head” and that Pangai’s height didn’t change dramatically, arguing Radley could have easily aimed lower on his opponent’s body.

[King Salvo]

So the panel is Radley, Crichton and Whitehead?

We might get off yet.

I don't like Radley's chances of a downgrade - Crichton has some hope of getting off although it's his third similar offence -Whitehead was fined so only a monetary cost

NRL prosecutor is using Campbell-Gillards grade 2 as a comparison where as Radley'a brief is using a grade 1 from last - all to do with steps and force - less steps means less force according to the NRL prosecutor- more force with more steps.

The judiciary panel consists of Tony Puletua, Michael Robertson and Bob Lindner, who is appearing via video link.

[bondi.boy]

Put him at 6. Can’t go any worse than Lam.

Lam should be hooker.