Lot of clowns on here making fun of typos.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NRL investigating Tedesco over "squid games" comment
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
You're nit pickin' BP. He was drunk and out of line and he is a year round employee of the NRL - enough said. The 10K will be about a week's interest on his stash.
Snorting cocaine is an excellent idea just before sex. Why d'ya think it's so popular? - "What's doing darling,? Got snow up in the room" - you'd be beating them off (and you would be beaten off enthusiastically as well). I could go on and on but who wants to hear about lust and depravity.
I hear that Dewsbury recommends it for everyone.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RoosterFanNZ View PostNSW Blues and Sydney Roosters skipper James Tedesco has been fined $10,000 by the NRL over a late-night incident at Bondi Beach.
It had been alleged the champion fullback directed a racial comment towards a woman of Vietnamese descent which forced the NRL’s integrity unit to launch an investigation.
The Daily Telegraph understands the allegations of racism could not be proven.
However he was fined for drunken behaviour.
The demon drink strikes again.
He should banish the booze from his life until his footy career is over...or forever.
The past is set in stone
The future is his to own.
5 minutes ago is history.
Pay the fine, learn from the experience, and move on.
Comment
-
Lots of people still in denial in this thread. As far as we can see, the NRL did a proper investigation and one that was far more comprehensive than our club's. Still yet to see proof substantiating the tinfoil-hat comments that the girl was a souths fan.
Also, there is no allegation of racism in the NRLs statement, just that Tedesco allegedly was drunken and disorderly.
Why is that supposedly so unfathomable? How do you think you know more than what the NRL has investigated when they have so much more access to evidence and statements than what we have?
Setting aside the materiality of the allegation - and whether what was allegedly said is actually offensive or not - people should be more open to accepting that:
- it's plausible someone's behavior could be reduced to a less than acceptable range whilst on the drink
- not everything is an agenda against our club.Last edited by Chook Norris; 11-12-2021, 05:33 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chook Norris View PostLots of people still in denial in this thread. As far as we can see, the NRL did a proper investigation and one that was far more comprehensive than our club's. Still yet to see proof substantiating the tinfoil-hat comments that the girl was a souths fan.
Also, there is no allegation of racism in the NRLs statement, just that Tedesco allegedly was drunken and disorderly.
Why is that supposedly so unfathomable? How do you think you know more than what the NRL has investigated when they have so much more access to evidence and statements than what we have?
Setting aside the materiality of the allegation - and whether what was allegedly said is actually offensive or not - people should be more open to accepting that:
- it's plausible someone's behavior could be reduced to a less than acceptable range whilst on the drink
- not everything is an agenda against our club.
The Women alleged it was a racist remark i question this myself as the show in question is not mocking Asian people and was it because it was a Korean show and she is not of a Korean background that offended her because of the history between the two countries.
I know some Koreans who would be offended if called Japanese because of historical events especially in WW2.
If it was a Vietnamese show would there be an issue?
https://thediplomat.com/2020/05/the-...es-in-vietnam/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Korea_in_the_Vietnam_WarLast edited by King Salvo; 11-12-2021, 07:28 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chook Norris View PostLots of people still in denial in this thread. As far as we can see, the NRL did a proper investigation and one that was far more comprehensive than our club's. Still yet to see proof substantiating the tinfoil-hat comments that the girl was a souths fan.
Also, there is no allegation of racism in the NRLs statement, just that Tedesco allegedly was drunken and disorderly.
Why is that supposedly so unfathomable? How do you think you know more than what the NRL has investigated when they have so much more access to evidence and statements than what we have?
Setting aside the materiality of the allegation - and whether what was allegedly said is actually offensive or not - people should be more open to accepting that:
- it's plausible someone's behavior could be reduced to a less than acceptable range whilst on the drink
- not everything is an agenda against our club.Last edited by Batemans Bay Rooster; 11-12-2021, 07:20 PM.
- 3 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by bondi.boy View Post
Well there you go.
The demon drink strikes again.
He should banish the booze from his life until his footy career is over...or forever.
The past is set in stone
The future is his to own.
5 minutes ago is history.
Pay the fine, learn from the experience, and move on.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chook Norris View PostLots of people still in denial in this thread. As far as we can see, the NRL did a proper investigation and one that was far more comprehensive than our club's. Still yet to see proof substantiating the tinfoil-hat comments that the girl was a souths fan.
Also, there is no allegation of racism in the NRLs statement, just that Tedesco allegedly was drunken and disorderly.
Why is that supposedly so unfathomable? How do you think you know more than what the NRL has investigated when they have so much more access to evidence and statements than what we have?
Setting aside the materiality of the allegation - and whether what was allegedly said is actually offensive or not - people should be more open to accepting that:
- it's plausible someone's behavior could be reduced to a less than acceptable range whilst on the drink
- not everything is an agenda against our club.
Which it took them like two years to admit was overzealous.
They are incompetent and frankly can go fark themselves.
So what I can gather is that the racist allegations were unproven and Teddy was fined for being, ummm, inebriated?
Apparently that's a fineable offence now! I hope he contests the decision and throws it back in their faces.
So yes, I still support Teddy 100%.
- 3 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tommy Smith View Post
So what I can gather is that the racist allegations were unproven and Teddy was fined for being, ummm, inebriated?
Apparently that's a fineable offence now! I hope he contests the decision and throws it back in their faces.
.
- 5 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Batemans Bay Rooster View Post
Well said. Reading between the lines and given that a fairly significant fine has been imposed, I'd say there's a fair chance that Tedesco was out of line. And to be honest it's a bit of an embarrassment that the club investigation didn't involve speaking with the girl. If he was in the wrong hope he's learned from it.
Originally posted by Tommy Smith View PostThis is the same NRL that fined Mitchell Pearce 250k and 8 weeks for being silly at a private party.
Which it took them like two years to admit was overzealous.
They are incompetent and frankly can go fark themselves.
So what I can gather is that the racist allegations were unproven and Teddy was fined for being, ummm, inebriated?
Apparently that's a fineable offence now! I hope he contests the decision and throws it back in their faces.
So yes, I still support Teddy 100%.
Time to get some perspective and stop clutching at straws.
They couldn't prove that Smith and Munster were on the coke. They were still fined for bringing the game into disrepute. Were you up in arms about their treatment too?
Yeah, I didn't think so.
- 1 like
Comment
-
If your problem is that a player can be fined for bringing the game into disrepute without concrete evidence - then that's arguably valid.
But don't make this out to be unfair treatment - and a NRL vendetta against the Roosters - when this punishment has been dished out again and again. You'd have to be living under a rock to think this.
Munster was fined $30k for bringing the game into disrepute. Not actually taking drugs - as this could not be proven. $10k for Teddy is not outlandish, especially given his position in the game.
- 2 likes
Comment
Comment