With the signing of Smith, I thought I'd start a discussion on recruitment / retention and the salary cap.
We've openly stated that we play for premierships.
We win premierships, therefore we can get players to sign and re-sign for less (hoping to win a premiership), leaving room in the cap for the best players to come to us (leading to more premierships). Examples include Teddy, Cronk, Smith, SBW, even the recent resigning of Manu.
This is a great position to be in and I'd say that we are in this tier with the Storm only.
Then you have the Panthers. Their strategy is clearly to develop talent, keep the best and move the rest on. This is a great strategy because eventually they could become a long term winning club, with the added benefit of also growing talent. Some clubs seem to be taking this same approach, just with less success, like the Warriors.
I thought about clubs like Souths, Eels, Manly, Raiders, Sharks, being in the same category as us but these clubs don't have the same attraction. They lose good players like Mahoney, Apisai Koroisau, Bateman or they back end their contracts like Souths did in 2014, or the Sharks, or they spend 80% of their cap on three players like Manly have.
Some clubs think they can attract players, however they haven't had the success in recent years and its showing. Probably because of the salary cap. This includes teams like the Broncos and Bulldogs. The arrogance of the Broncos to say they don't have rebuilding phases.
Then you have clubs like the Tigers, Cowboys, Dragons, Titans, Knights. They cant get a break when it comes to recruitment. They have to pay market price (or overs) for their players. Its a downward spiral. Then when a talented player comes along, they leave these clubs to play for the Roosters
Premiership Tier
- Roosters
- Storm
Development Tier
- Panthers
Hot and Cold Tier
- Souths
- Manly
- Eels
- Sharks
- Raiders
Future Development Tier
- Warriors
Cant Buy a Premiership Anymore Tier
- Broncos
- Bulldogs
Struggling Tier
- Tigers
- Cowboys
- Dragons
- Titans
- Knights
We've openly stated that we play for premierships.
We win premierships, therefore we can get players to sign and re-sign for less (hoping to win a premiership), leaving room in the cap for the best players to come to us (leading to more premierships). Examples include Teddy, Cronk, Smith, SBW, even the recent resigning of Manu.
This is a great position to be in and I'd say that we are in this tier with the Storm only.
Then you have the Panthers. Their strategy is clearly to develop talent, keep the best and move the rest on. This is a great strategy because eventually they could become a long term winning club, with the added benefit of also growing talent. Some clubs seem to be taking this same approach, just with less success, like the Warriors.
I thought about clubs like Souths, Eels, Manly, Raiders, Sharks, being in the same category as us but these clubs don't have the same attraction. They lose good players like Mahoney, Apisai Koroisau, Bateman or they back end their contracts like Souths did in 2014, or the Sharks, or they spend 80% of their cap on three players like Manly have.
Some clubs think they can attract players, however they haven't had the success in recent years and its showing. Probably because of the salary cap. This includes teams like the Broncos and Bulldogs. The arrogance of the Broncos to say they don't have rebuilding phases.
Then you have clubs like the Tigers, Cowboys, Dragons, Titans, Knights. They cant get a break when it comes to recruitment. They have to pay market price (or overs) for their players. Its a downward spiral. Then when a talented player comes along, they leave these clubs to play for the Roosters
Premiership Tier
- Roosters
- Storm
Development Tier
- Panthers
Hot and Cold Tier
- Souths
- Manly
- Eels
- Sharks
- Raiders
Future Development Tier
- Warriors
Cant Buy a Premiership Anymore Tier
- Broncos
- Bulldogs
Struggling Tier
- Tigers
- Cowboys
- Dragons
- Titans
- Knights
Comment