Since his major strength is his tackling... his running game and darts from dummy half while intelligent leave a lot to be desired.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would Jake Friend be a Better Lock?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by bravehalfbackPEARCE View PostSince his major strength is his tackling... his running game and darts from dummy half while intelligent leave a lot to be desired."Those who care about you can hear you, even when you are quiet" - Steve Maraboli
-
No way.
Great hooker. Just needs to get his combinations working.
He is slowly figuring Pearce out as evident by their special play on display yesterday with Pearce flying through the gap(scored a try in the exact fashion late last year).
He needs some support runners. Just look at the near try yesterday, he made the perfect run across field looking for runners only for nobody to move.
Doesn't help that he doesn't have a fullback to work with.
Just look what Cronk and Slater do for Smith each week.Last edited by BigMike; 03-19-2012, 07:09 PM.
Comment
-
The guy is 4 foot nothing, you have to take the ball up if you play a tight lock role, thats not Jakes go.
I like him interchanging with Mitchell having nothing to do with the lock position.
Locks today play a tight positioal role, thats why FPN is their, Bosden could probably play lock IMO. Maybe Guerra too, I think it is a blessing in disguise that guerra is injured.
I have a feeling Anasta will move to the backrow allowing Mortimer to 5/8 which means Mitchell will make the 17.
I like Maubs Cordner Takairangi Symonds as our wide running forwards.
I will name my team now for RD 3
1 Mini 2 Carney 3 SKD 4 BJ 5 Perrett 6 Morts 7 Pearce 8 JWH 9 Friend 10 Kennedy 11 Maubs 12 Anasta 13 FPN 14 Mitchell 15 Tasi 16 Bosden 17 Arona but I would go with Symonds.
I think Cordner will miss out again
Comment
Comment