Mini & Teddy are equal to me.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Teddy the Best Fullback we've Ever Had?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by eddie View PostHow's this for a backline
1- James Tedesco
2- Anthony Minichiello
3- John Brass
4- Mark Harris
5- Bill Mullins
6- Brad Fittler
7- Kevin Hastings
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mickie Lane View PostMini & Teddy are equal to me.
On potential, both are equal but Teddy's had better luck with injuries, enabling him to better his game.
Then again... Mini in known for his innovations in rehab/prep which are now used by everybody. He also has the runs on the board with 302 games and our record for most tries despite extended periods of absence. I dunno what Teddy's combined career tries are, but would suggest Mini's got him covered?
Overall I think Teddy is the more lethal player. However he has the benefit of modern sports science behind him, much of which Mini pioneered. To me it really comes down to personal preference...
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by SupermanSupportsEasts4Eva View PostLooks formidable. But what about the couple of backline immortals, in Dally M and Dave Brown. An argument could also be made for Cronk's inclusion. We definitely have been blessed as a club
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by eddie View PostHow's this for a backline
1- James Tedesco
2- Anthony Minichiello
3- John Brass
4- Mark Harris
5- Bill Mullins
6- Brad Fittler
7- Kevin Hastings
Toups would be ahead of Mullins
Comment
-
Originally posted by gragra View PostAs good as Teddy is, he's been a Rooster for only 4 years...Miini 15 years and a 1 club player.....
Quality v quantity comes to mind, but mini had both.
Comment
-
Russell Fairfax was my favourite as a kid. Loved the way he played. Bit of a trailblazer in that he played like a second five eight at times. Later, Gary Belcher was of a similar ilk also. There was something about the way he moved that reminded me of Fairfax.
Love Minnie but Teddy has it for me. Interesting argument but Teddy has moved past Slater for me, his involvement levels have taken the position in a direction that I don't think others can replicate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ism22 View Post
Tough call for me as Mini had the injuries and was a winger in 2002. Based on subjective form I think Teddy is the more established player. Despite the quality of FBs around (Ponga, Pap, Trbo, Hynes...etc), he's seen as the best.
On potential, both are equal but Teddy's had better luck with injuries, enabling him to better his game.
Then again... Mini in known for his innovations in rehab/prep which are now used by everybody. He also has the runs on the board with 302 games and our record for most tries despite extended periods of absence. I dunno what Teddy's combined career tries are, but would suggest Mini's got him covered?
Overall I think Teddy is the more lethal player. However he has the benefit of modern sports science behind him, much of which Mini pioneered. To me it really comes down to personal preference...
Gee mini would of gone close to 350+ games and probably 160-170 odd tries, he was at the peak of his game when his back gave in 2006, didn’t play properly again til 2010
Comment
-
Originally posted by eddie View PostHow's this for a backline
1- James Tedesco
2- Anthony Minichiello
3- John Brass
4- Mark Harris
5- Bill Mullins
6- Brad Fittler
7- Kevin Hastings
80's Parra
90's Brisbane & Canberra
Wally's QLD
8 in a row QLD
I'd make the following adjustments:
Teddy
Mini
Latrell
Manu
Mullins
Freddy
Cronk
People's opinions on Latrell is well known, but both Manu and Latrell can play the power game and the silky game whereas Harris was power and Brassy was silk.
Although Horrie is a club legend, head over rules heart and I'd have to put Cronk there. His dad played for Bondi United and is an Easts fanatic so he's not too much of a Johnny come lately. His uncles also are Easts fanatics.
Harris....before Grothe, Meninga, Miles, Jonah Lomu, Sivo etc, there was BIG MARK HARRIS. The original!
Comment
Comment