Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lodge facing a fine - what a joke

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lodge facing a fine - what a joke

    Roosters prop Matthew Lodge will escape with a fine for the high tackle which ended Newcastle fullback Kalyn Ponga's game on Friday night at McDonald Jones Stadium.

    Ponga failed his HIA and didn't return following the incident in the eighth minute, which saw Lodge put on report and later charged with a Grade 1 Careless High Tackle. Lodge faces a $1,800 fine with a guilty plea or a $2,500 fine if found guilty.
    1985: 1 try vs Parramatta, 1 try vs Manly, 1 try vs Wests, 2 tries vs Souffs
    1986: 2 tries vs Illawarra, 1 try vs Balmain, 2 tries vs Norths.

  • #2
    Pretty standard decision in this nanny state day and age
    When you trust your television
    what you get is what you got
    Cause when they own the information
    they can bend it all they want

    John Mayer

    Comment


    • #3
      For this?

      https://www.instagram.com/p/CgT8l4HhuwT

      Surely we appeal.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Inflictor View Post
        For this?

        https://www.instagram.com/p/CgT8l4HhuwT

        Surely we appeal.
        NO!
        NO!

        DO NOT APPEAL!

        Pay the fine and buy a lottery ticket.
        .
        I'm watching the taped replay now.
        Not a high tackle...but...there's one frame that could be argued made
        contact with the high neck.

        A fine is fair punishment.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by bondi.boy View Post

          NO!
          NO!

          DO NOT APPEAL!

          Pay the fine and buy a lottery ticket.
          .
          I'm watching the taped replay now.
          Not a high tackle...but...there's one frame that could be argued made
          contact with the high neck.

          A fine is fair punishment.
          If he loses it is just a higher fine.
          if we accept it is on his record

          Comment


          • #6
            Fair enough a fine only - player welfare is paramount in such decisions.

            If that was Keary would people be arguing that the offending player shouldn't be fined - I strongly doubt it. They would be advocating for the offending player to be suspended.
            Last edited by King Salvo; 07-23-2022, 01:31 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              If ponga didn't have all those prior Hia incidents, lodges light contact w his neck would have been only an on field penalty. An over reaction by the mrc.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by gragra View Post
                If ponga didn't have all those prior Hia incidents, lodges light contact w his neck would have been only an on field penalty. An over reaction by the mrc.
                There is good merit to this comment snd also why this is a wonderful thread that Carlos has started
                Last edited by Andrew Walker; 07-23-2022, 01:46 PM.
                When you trust your television
                what you get is what you got
                Cause when they own the information
                they can bend it all they want

                John Mayer

                Comment


                • #9
                  Fine for the outcome, not the act.

                  Standard reactionary punishments from the NRL.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post
                    Fine for the outcome, not the act.

                    Standard reactionary punishments from the NRL.
                    Agreed
                    When you trust your television
                    what you get is what you got
                    Cause when they own the information
                    they can bend it all they want

                    John Mayer

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      This is a case of where "thank you very much" ( for just a fine) is very wise.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        like Rooster _6 said...the MRC wait for a doctors report before making a decision , and what if pongia didnt get a concussion (which was a result of his head hitting the turf) does Lodgey get off?.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Lodge obviously got Ponga flush on the cheekbone thats why he failed his HIA.
                          Ponga is at the Luke Keary level when it comes to concussions, it wasnt hard contact yet he failed his HIA because of concussion.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            No , not flush but a glancing brushofhis cheekbone. The brush caused him to contact the ground where the "concussion" occurred. Again without the priors, concussion would almost certainly not occurred. But you are correct w the Keary analogy..

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Happy with a fine, I was actually expecting a 2-3 week suspension.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X