Originally posted by A Country Member
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Souths complaining - "We should be hosting first game at new stadium"
Collapse
X
-
The Roosters have a right to exist.
They were disadvantaged last season..as Mr Abdo said.
If Souths are allowed to set up house at the new Allianz stadium...the Roosters should sue the SCGTrust/the Govt for the money Roosters sank into facilities at the complex that Souths would be using.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Fatso Richo has blood on his hands with this one. Ace administrator my ar$e. It all about him..........
Under the guise that a greater percentage of Vermin these days live outside their spiritual (more like spirits) base of the East, he sold his lot to that monstrosity at Homebush because the people running it guaranteed them $$$ each home game regardless of the crowd size i.e. corporate hospitality/sponsorship, advertising etc...
Now they want back?
Get *^%#@$ i say. Can't have the cake and eat it!
- 6 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by SamKerrSimp View Post
I was at a Roosters v Souths game once and a bloke had a banner that said Keep Australia Clean Put Souths In The Bin that was marvellous stuff it needs to make a comeback"Those who care about you can hear you, even when you are quiet" - Steve Maraboli
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Thirteen View PostIt’s just killing Souths that we have this wonderful new stadium."Those who care about you can hear you, even when you are quiet" - Steve Maraboli
Comment
-
Originally posted by redwhiteblue View Post
Jan Brady strikes again..that youtube clip I posted was from an episode where Jan hid all of Marcia's trophies and awards because she was jealous...Souths may have won plenty decades ago but only one in the modern era (ie colour telly has been invented..) and that was a big stitch up all us sane people could see coming a mile off....
For e.g.
- There were only 10 to 12 teams playing.
- Up until the early 60s (?) it was like the EPL - first past the post won the title. No play offs or deciders.
Their fans will always come back with 22 premierships however, the fact is, in the modern game 1 measly premiership in 50 years is totally inept and hopelessly unsuccessful imo.
Roosters on the other hand have competed in 8 GF's over the past 20 years. We did not win them all but unlike many other mediocre teams we've been consistently successful.
- 3 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by theGman View Post
And may I add for the benefit of the younger forum fans, that the bulk of the Vermin's premierships were won under vastly different rules & requirements than nowadays.
For e.g.
- There were only 10 to 12 teams playing.
- Up until the early 60s (?) it was like the EPL - first past the post won the title. No play offs or deciders.
Their fans will always come back with 22 premierships however, the fact is, in the modern game 1 measly premiership in 50 years is totally inept and hopelessly unsuccessful imo.
Roosters on the other hand have competed in 8 GF's over the past 20 years. We did not win them all but unlike many other mediocre teams we've been consistently successful.
It would take new souffs 200+ years to get 4.
FVCK CANCER
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by theGman View Post
And may I add for the benefit of the younger forum fans, that the bulk of the Vermin's premierships were won under vastly different rules & requirements than nowadays.
For e.g.
- There were only 10 to 12 teams playing.
- Up until the early 60s (?) it was like the EPL - first past the post won the title. No play offs or deciders.
Their fans will always come back with 22 premierships however, the fact is, in the modern game 1 measly premiership in 50 years is totally inept and hopelessly unsuccessful imo.
Roosters on the other hand have competed in 8 GF's over the past 20 years. We did not win them all but unlike many other mediocre teams we've been consistently successful."Those who care about you can hear you, even when you are quiet" - Steve Maraboli
- 3 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by redwhiteblue View Post
But successful in the fact that's all Russell Crowe has to brag about since he had claimed that they would win at least every second year once he took over...so it's going to be our 10 year anniversary next year and then in 2024 it will be theirs..but we've won twice since then too and back to back..Russell's plan didn't work out how he said it would...
it’s nice to be a roosters fan
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by milanja View Post
So we just had a 20yr celebration this year, a 10 yr next year, then a 50yr celebration the following years back to back.
it’s nice to be a roosters fan"Those who care about you can hear you, even when you are quiet" - Steve Maraboli
Comment
-
According to today's DT article Souths could well be playing all their home games at Allianz Stadium from 2023...if they pay full whack, no 'mates rates', no 'sweetheart deals'.
It's an interesting article, but I can't link it...as the last site crash saw my desktop computer and the Pen site become incompatible.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bondi.boy View PostAccording to today's DT article Souths could well be playing all their home games at Allianz Stadium from 2023...if they pay full whack, no 'mates rates', no 'sweetheart deals'.
It's an interesting article, but I can't link it...as the last site crash saw my desktop computer and the Pen site become incompatible.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Headless Chook View Post
So I gather we get some sort of discounted rate for using the Stadium whereas the Bunnies will be like any organisation trying to hire the venue and will have to pay full freight?
Souths now have a "lucrative contract" at Accor Stadium...and would have an "inferior contract" at Allianz Stadium.
A gap, in other words, between what they are paying now and what they would have to pay at Allianz.
Sports Minister said at meeting he would be open to Souths pursuing a move to Allianz, but it must come "at no expense to the taxpayer".
ie: no discount, Souths would have to pay "retail" the same as all hirers.
Souths would have to absorb the gap.
- 1 like
Comment
Comment