nrlw v parra

[Thirteen]

Playing or being bashed?

What about kids playing league then?

My son plays Bondi United Under 12s. I’m yet to see a kid get bashed in all his games I’ve watched over two years. Anyway they are boys so getting out their agro on the footy field (of course within the rules) is fine by me.

[zac]

one of the talking points was kelleher playing as a middle forward and burton playing dummy half. burton seems to have put on a bit of a muscle and i thought she went okay but another option is to bring kelleher on as dummy half and move brill to the middle and bring another forward onto the bench but i doubt strangey will change a winning team

[King Salvo]

My son plays Bondi United Under 12s. I’m yet to see a kid get bashed in all his games I’ve watched over two years. Anyway they are boys so getting out their agro on the footy field (of course within the rules) is fine by me.

We should call you Dale - you keep digging a hole

Just fess up your dislike of NRLW has naught to do with the so called "Women Bashing Each Other " reason which I have yet to see myself - The Gig is up as they say.

[redwhiteblue]

Congratulations Captain Izzy

https://www.instagram.com/p/Chg1w9Tr..._web_copy_link

[King Salvo]

one of the talking points was kelleher playing as a middle forward and burton playing dummy half. burton seems to have put on a bit of a muscle and i thought she went okay but another option is to bring kelleher on as dummy half and move brill to the middle and bring another forward onto the bench but i doubt strangey will change a winning team

Shawden Burton is a dummy half mostly and Jocelyn Kelleher a utility who can play both back and forward roles - Destiny Brill is a lock so I assume the reason to play her at dummy half is to have her in the starting 13 since Keilee Joseph is playing lock.

Knights look a very good side - Jesse Southwell is killing it so far- Hannah Southwell has done her knee - one of CL's it looked like - MCL/PCL/ACL

[Thirteen]

We should call you Dale - you keep digging a hole

Just fess up your dislike of NRLW has naught to do with the so called "Women Bashing Each Other " reason which I have yet to see myself - The Gig is up as they say.

You are correct Sally. I am also turned off by buffed up women trying to be like men. I find it very unattractive. I like my women feminine. But if you like your women to look/act like blokes than that’s ok too.

[King Salvo]

You are correct Sally. I am also turned off by buffed up women trying to be like men. I find it very unattractive. I like my women feminine. But if you like your women to look/act like blokes than that’s ok too.

Keep digging those holes Dale- dig dig dig

[SamKerrSimp]

You are correct Sally. I am also turned off by buffed up women trying to be like men. I find it very unattractive. I like my women feminine. But if you like your women to look/act like blokes than that’s ok too.

Why can't you just piss off? You said you don't like womens footy that's good then go away nobody cares that you don't like it. Can the mods start deleting these posts like the idiot in the blue shirt who only antagonize womens sport? What do you gain out of just commenting over and over that you dont like the womens game besides showcasing to everyone what a bigoted tosser you are?

[mightyrooster]

You are correct Sally. I am also turned off by buffed up women trying to be like men. I find it very unattractive. I like my women feminine. But if you like your women to look/act like blokes than that’s ok too.

So women need to look attractive for men when playing sport? Lucky I watch rugby league because I love the sport and not to look at their hot physiques and brooding good looks.

[Thirteen]

Why can't you just piss off? You said you don't like womens footy that's good then go away nobody cares that you don't like it. Can the mods start deleting these posts like the idiot in the blue shirt who only antagonize womens sport? What do you gain out of just commenting over and over that you dont like the womens game besides showcasing to everyone what a bigoted tosser you are?

Is that your best defence? Calling someone names? Did I hit a nerve?

[Thirteen]

So women need to look attractive for men when playing sport? Lucky I watch rugby league because I love the sport and not to look at their hot physiques and brooding good looks.

Not at all. I watch many unattractive women play tennis and cricket and enjoy it thoroughly and I don’t care how they look.

[rented tracksuit]

Under-moderated feels like a term that would be subjective.

I would say there is a low level of interference from moderators/admins compared to your average forum and that the forum is largely self-moderated by the users.



If Chris deems that to be the case then that’s up to him. But from what I’ve seen most don’t have an issue with the Women’s Roosters content being posted in the Roosters rugby league discussion area. It’s a minority who seem to have other issues with women’s movements and sport that don’t want it in the Roosters sub-forum.



I have skipped over your opinions in here however if you quote me especially about something to do with forum moderation I think I at least owe you a response. I’m not saying I disagree with everything you our Thirteen say but rather your points made in this thread specifically seem to come from a bigoted stand point of view, they lack balance and a general understanding of what’s trying to be achieved in the women’s game.

Well said however it’s going to be a point of conjecture moving forward as my views stay firm and I don’t see how it’s bigoted to request for content to be changed to a more appropriate section of the site. More a like a woke response from those disagreeing.

I don’t believe it’s the minority either. Many just don’t comment which is their right however the loudest are always the minority and take their work beliefs to the extreme by pushing them down others throats and attempting to belittle them while sitting in on imaginary high horse.

Can you clarify what issues you think we have with womens movements and sports simply for wanting to have their game in a more appropriate section? Surely going to the effort to recognise them by giving them their very own section would be respectful enough? Do you not want to show them the respect you say they deserve?

[rented tracksuit]

RT, I just don’t understand why you can’t just ignore the thread if you’re not interested? When I see a topic header that’s Rooster related but looks like I won’t find it interesting, I just don’t go in there. Or I check it out at the start, then make a decision whether it’s for me or not and if not, don’t open it again. Does it really cause you that much hurt seeing it in the main section as opposed to its own sub-section?

Not at all MR. As others have stated, the threads are sometimes not titled clearly that it’s a NRLW thread which is misleading.

Do you not think it should be a good thing to recognise them by giving them their own section? We could them do as you say and not go into it if we didn’t want to right?

Now as for your response here, you could have taken your own advice and fine the same yet you chose to reply. Do I not have the same right to express my opinions?

[rented tracksuit]

I’ll take that as a compliment.

Triple LIKE.

[rented tracksuit]

nothing stopping the anti-nrlw campaigners from starting a thread about what's wrong with the nrlw either here or in the off topic section rather than going off topic and attempting to derail threads that are started to discuss footy

Use the same logic and give it its own section.