nrlw v parra

[rented tracksuit]

Yes just like my RIP Judith Durham thread which had barely any posts about the lady herself or her musical achievements. I see it's resurfaced today but because I have a few on ignore now I doubt very much if they are posting songs from her back catalogue or sharing memories of her music 2 weeks later. It's the same little clique that go around derailing perfectly good threads. They sit here for hours on end looking to see who they can try and needle next.

Look at that pot right there.

Talk about needles. Most of us discuss things in the public sections and don’t need to run to the moderators to stir trouble.

[rented tracksuit]

Is that your best defence? Calling someone names? Did I hit a nerve?

They always resort to name calling when they can’t ‘change’ somebody.

[rented tracksuit]

Yes just like my RIP Judith Durham thread which had barely any posts about the lady herself or her musical achievements. I see it's resurfaced today but because I have a few on ignore now I doubt very much if they are posting songs from her back catalogue or sharing memories of her music 2 weeks later. It's the same little clique that go around derailing perfectly good threads. They sit here for hours on end looking to see who they can try and needle next.

What happened in that thread? Are you at the centre of yet another flare up on this site?

Better run off to admin then to report someone has posted in ‘your’ thread!

[mightyrooster]

Not at all MR. As others have stated, the threads are sometimes not titled clearly that it’s a NRLW thread which is misleading.

Do you not think it should be a good thing to recognise them by giving them their own section? We could them do as you say and not go into it if we didn’t want to right?

Now as for your response here, you could have taken your own advice and fine the same yet you chose to reply. Do I not have the same right to express my opinions?

Well with your last sentence I have chosen to ignore your comments at least 50 or so times now. Your comments on this topic are, well, shall we say very consistent. I think by now everyone gets where you stand on the subject, so I don’t think you really need to come in and derail the thread constantly just to deliver the same message again and again. At least on the topic re: the NRLW that is.

[rented tracksuit]

Well with your last sentence I have chosen to ignore your comments at least 50 or so times now. Your comments on this topic are, well, shall we say very consistent. I think by now everyone gets where you stand on the subject, so I don’t think you really need to come in and derail the thread constantly just to deliver the same message again and again. At least on the topic re: the NRLW that is.

So on the topic of your last sentence, you say you understand my stance yet still tried to discredit my views.

For someone saying they have ignored my previous 50 posts, why did you decide to step in now considering you ignore them?

The point you are trying to make us exactly what I’m saying about this stuff in the main section. Just because you ignore something doesn’t take it away.

[zac]

king salvo has watched a lot of roosters games live but seems like thirteen might have watched more. thirteen has been a fan for a long time but seems like king salvo has been a fan for longer. for me, it's really neck and neck and the two of them need to have a pissing contest to determine who is the winner of ... ?

i don't think there is any point responding to the anti-nrlw people in threads devoted to the nrlw. it's better to just stick to the footy

[The Lip]

king salvo has watched a lot of roosters games live but seems like thirteen might have watched more. thirteen has been a fan for a long time but seems like king salvo has been a fan for longer. for me, it's really neck and neck and the two of them need to have a pissing contest to determine who is the winner of ... ?

i don't think there is any point responding to the anti-nrlw people in threads devoted to the nrlw. it's better to just stick to the footy

Hahaha - that's funny but it's even more fun watching these to go at it on that ridiculous argument.

[The Lip]

They might have Vs, but that's where the similarity to femininity ends.

That's a pretty shit comment Carlos

[rented tracksuit]

king salvo has watched a lot of roosters games live but seems like thirteen might have watched more. thirteen has been a fan for a long time but seems like king salvo has been a fan for longer. for me, it's really neck and neck and the two of them need to have a pissing contest to determine who is the winner of ... ?

i don't think there is any point responding to the anti-nrlw people in threads devoted to the nrlw. it's better to just stick to the footy

Great plan but how far can Sally pee squatting down?

[redwhiteblue]

Why can't you just piss off? You said you don't like womens footy that's good then go away nobody cares that you don't like it. Can the mods start deleting these posts like the idiot in the blue shirt who only antagonize womens sport? What do you gain out of just commenting over and over that you dont like the womens game besides showcasing to everyone what a bigoted tosser you are?

I wouldn't go that far, as someone who has known Thirteen for many years as I just mentioned in the game day thread. I've met quite a few of the men on here in real life and 99% of them are absolute gentleman. Don't always judge someone about what's posted on here..

[redwhiteblue]

Not at all. I watch many unattractive women play tennis and cricket and enjoy it thoroughly and I don’t care how they look.

You are gonna love this..Horrie told me to go back to the kitchen the other night...

But for context, on Saturday I was making lunch in the kitchen and the women had scored before I could even plate up the salmon..in the evening, the men had scored before I'd finished plating up the pizza...end result? Me being told to stay in the kitchen...maybe until first weekend in October...

Horrie is a far better cook than me anyway...but we have to have a laugh where we can..

[redwhiteblue]

Oh and for the one saying it was a bunch of women in Trafalgar Square, I never posted that at all..thanks to the kind soul who told me about that twisting of what I posted..

Gee, lots of men cheering on the talented women at the stadium too

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpYv8XlTbe0

[rented tracksuit]

Pmsl!

[rented tracksuit]

7,000 people packed into Trafalgar Square to watch the Lionesses win..something the men haven't done since 1966...even I wasn't born then...

Men, women, he she’s and whatever else there are these days. 7000 people. Wow!

[redwhiteblue]

Agreed, we tried to have seperate parts of the forum when it was originally set up but been made very clear by the community on here that we are just happy to have all Roosters related content in one sub-forum. That includes juniors, senior reserves & woemen’s.

I think it would be wrong to create a sub-forum now just to satisfy the bigots. It’s not like these threads are deceptive in nature, if you have no interest in the women’s game then simply don’t click on the thread.

Are we going to be subjected to this every week throughout the womens season? I had 3 threads of my own about deceased singers/movie stars trashed in the Away From the Game section by the same little clique who go around pestering people despite us implementing the 'ignore' function as per Chris' suggestion.